Estuaries

, Volume 27, Issue 2, pp 188–196 | Cite as

Predation by the black-clawed mud crab,Panopeus herbstii, in Mid-Atlantic salt marshes: Further evidence for top-down control of marsh grass production

  • Brian Reed Silliman
  • Craig A. Layman
  • Kane Geyer
  • J. C. Zieman
Article

Abstract

Although top-down control of plant growth has been shown in a variety of marine systems, it is widely thought to be unimportant in salt marshes. Recent caging experiments in Virginia and Georgia have challenged this notion and shown that the dominant marsh grazer (the periwinkle,Littoraria irrorata) not only suppresses plant growth, but can denude marsh substrate at high densities. In these same marshes, our field observations suggest that the black-clawed mud crab,Panopeus herbstii, is an abundant and potentially important top-down determinant of periwinkle density. No studies have quantitatively examinedPanopeus distribution or trophic interactions in marsh systems, and its potential impacts on community structure remained unexplored. We investigated distribution and feeding habits ofPanopeus in eight salt marshes along the Mid-Atlantic seashore (Delaware-North Carolina). We found that mud crabs were abundant in tall (4–82 ind m−2), intermediate (0–15 ind m−2), and short-form (0–5 ind m−2)Spartina alterniflora zones in all marshes and that crab densities were negatively correlated with tidal height and positively correlated with bivalve density. Excavation of crab lairs r⇍utinely produced shells of plant-grazing snails (up to 36 lair−1) and bivalves. Lab experiments confirmed that mud crabs readily consume these abundant marsh molluscs. To experimentally examine potential community effects of observed predation patterns, we manipulated crab and periwinkle densities in a 1-mo field experiment. Results showed thatPanopeus can suppress gastropod abundance and that predation rates increase with increasing snail density. In turn, crab suppression of snail density reduces grazing intensity on salt marsh cordgrass, suggesting presence of a trophic cascade. These results indicate that this previously under-appreciated consumer is an important and indirect determinant of community structure and contribute to a growing body of evidence challenging the long-standing notion that consumers play a minor role in regulating marsh plant growth.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatured Cited

  1. Ambrose, W. G., Jr. 1984. Role of predatory infauna in structuring marine soft-bottom communities.Marine Ecology Progress Series 17:109–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Belsovsky, G. E. 1985. Optimal foraging and community structure: Implications for a guild of generalist grassland herbivores.Oecologia 70:35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bertness, M. D. 1984. Ribbed mussels andSpartina alterniflora production in a New England salt marsh.Ecology 65:1794–1807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bertness, M. D., G. Trussell, P. J. Ewanchuk, andB. R. Silliman. 2003. Testing for Alternate Stable States on Maine Rocky Shores.Ecology 83:3434–3448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Daiber, F. C. 1982. Animals of the Tidal Marsh. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Duffy, J. E. andM. E. Hay. 2001. Ecology and evolution of marine consumer-prey interactions, p. 131–157.In M. Bertness, M. E. Hay, and S. D. Gaines (eds.), Marine Community Ecology. Sinauer Press, Sunderland, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  7. Estes, J. A. andL. Palmisano. 1974. Sea otters: Their role in structuring nearshore communities.Science 185:1058–1060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fell, E. P., N. C. Olmstead, E. Carlson, W. Jacob, D. Hitchcock, andG. Silber. 1982. Distribution and abundance of macroinvertebrates on certain Connecticut tidal marshes, with emphasis on dominant molluscs.Estuaries 5:235–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hay, M. E. 1984. Patterns of fish and urchin grazing on Caribbean reefs: Are previous results typical?Ecology 65:446–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Heck, Jr.K. L. andJ. F. Valentine. 1995. Sea urchin herbivory: Evidence for long-lasting effects in subtropical seagrass meadows.Journal of Experimental Biology and Ecology 189:205–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Holmquist, J. G., G. V. N. Powell, andS. M. Sogard. 1989. Decapod and stomatopod communities of seagrass-covered mud banks in Florida Bay: Inter-and intra-bank heterogeneity with special reference to isolated subenvironments.Bulletin of Marine Science 44:251–262.Google Scholar
  12. Kneib, R. T. andC. A. Weeks. 1990. Intertidal distribution and feeding habits of the mud crab,Eurytium limosum.Estuaries 13:462–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Knudsen, J. W. 1960. Aspects of the ecology of the California pebble crabs (Crustacea: Xanthidae).Ecological Monographs: 30:166–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee, S. Y. andR. T. Kneib. 1994. Effects of biogenic structure on prey consumption by the xanthid crabsEurytium limosum andPanopeus herbstii in a salt marsh.Marine Ecology Progress Series 104:39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lewis, D. B. andL. A. Eby. 2002. Spatially heterogenous refugia and predation risk in intertidal salt marshes.Oikos 96:119–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lipcius, R. W. andW. Stockhausen. 2002. Concurrent Decline of the Spawning Stock, Recruitment, Larval Abundance, and Size of the Blue Crab Callinectes Sapidus in Chesapeake Bay.Marine Ecology Progress Series 226:45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lubchenco, J. 1978. Plant species diversity in a marine intertidal community: Importance of herbivore food preference and algal competitive abilities.American Naturalist 112:23–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McDermott, J. J. 1960. The predation of oysters and barnacles by crabs on the family Xanthidae.Proceedings from the Pennsylvania Academy of Sciences 34:199–211.Google Scholar
  19. McDonald, J. 1982. Divergent life history patterns in the cooccurring intertidal crabsPanopeus herbstii andEurypanopeus depressus (Crustacea: Brachyura: Xanthidae).Marine Ecology Progress Series 8:173–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McQueen, D. J., M. R. S. Johnannes, J. R. Post, T. J. Stewart, andD. R. S. Lean. 1989. Bottom-up and top-down impacts on freshwater pelagic community structure.Ecological Monographs 59:289–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Menge, B. A. 1976. Organization of the New England rocky intertidal community: Role of predation, competition, and environmental heterogeneity.Ecological Monographs 46:355–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mense, D. J., M. H. Posey, T. West, andF. Kincheloe. 1995. Settlement of brachyuran postlarvae along the North Carolina coast.Bulletin of Marine Science 57:793–806.Google Scholar
  23. Meyer, D. L. 1994. Habitat partitioning between the xanthid crabsPanopeus herbstii andEuryPanopeus depressus on intertidal oyster reefs (Crassostrea virginia) in southeastern North Carolina.Estuaries 17:674–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mithsch, W. J. andJ. G. Gosselink. 2002. Wetlands. Van Nostrand Reinhold. New York.Google Scholar
  25. Morin, P. 1999. Community Ecology. Blackwell, Ltd., Malden, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  26. Pace, M. L., J. J. Cole, S. R. Carpenter, andJ. F. Kitchell. 1999. Trophic cascades revealed in diverse ecosystems.Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14:483–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Paine, R. 1966. Food web complexity and species diversity.American Naturalist 100:65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Paine, R. T. 1980. Food webs: Linkage, interaction strength, and community infrastructure.Journal of Animal Ecology 49:667–685.Google Scholar
  29. Posey, M. H. andA. H. Hines. 1991. Complex predator-prey interactions within an estuarine benthic community.Ecology 72:2155–2169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Seed, R. 1980. Predator-prey relationships between the mud crabPanopeus herbstii, the blue crab,Callinectes sapidus and the Atlantic ribbed musselGeukensia denissa.Estuarine, Coastal and Marine Science 2:445–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Silliman, B. R. 1999. Effects of nutrient enrichment and periwinkle grazing onSpartina alterniflora growth. Master’s Thesis, University of Virginia. Charlottesville, Virginia.Google Scholar
  32. Silliman, B. R. andM. D. Bertness. 2002. A trophic cascade regulates salt marsh primary production.Proceedings From the National Academy of Sciences 99:10500–10505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Silliman, B. R. andA. Bortolus. 2003. Underestimation ofSpartina production in Western Atlantic salt marshes: Marsh in vertebrates eat more than just detritus.Oikos 143:549–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Silliman, B. R. andJ. C. Zieman. 2001. Top-down control ofSpartina alterniflora production by periwinkle grazing in a Virginia marsh,Ecology 82:2830–43.Google Scholar
  35. Strong, D. R. 1992. Are trophic cascades all wet? Differentiation and donor-control in speciose ecosystems.Ecology 73:747–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Teal, J. M. 1958. Distribution of fiddler crabs in Georgia salt marshes.Ecology 39:185–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Teal, J. M. 1962. Energy flow in the salt marsh ecosystem of Georgia.Ecology 43:614–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Trussell, G., P. J. Ewanchuk, andM. D. Bertness. 2002. Field evidence of trait-mediated indirect interactions in a rocky intertidal food web.Ecology Letters 5:241–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Welch, J. M. andC. E. Epifanio. 1994. Recruitment in larval Xanthid crabs: Is prey abundance important? Master’s Thesis, University of Delaware, Lewes, Delaware.Google Scholar
  40. Whetstone, J. M. andA. G. Eversole. 1981. Effects of size and temperature on mud crab,Panopeus herbstii, predation on hard clams,Mercenaria mercenaria.Estuaries 4:153–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Williams, A. B. 1984. Shrimps, Lobsters and Crabs of the Atlantic of the Eastern United States, Maine to Florida, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  42. Wrona, A. B., R. G. Wiegert, andT. D. Bishop. 1995. Initial report of settlement patterns of Brachyuran megalopae at Sapelo Island, GA, U.S.A..Bulletin of Marine Science 57:807–820.Google Scholar
  43. Zieman, J. C. 1982. The ecology of the seagrasses of south Florida: A community profile. Biological Services Program FWS/OBS-82/85. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Estuarine Research Federation 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brian Reed Silliman
    • 1
  • Craig A. Layman
    • 1
  • Kane Geyer
    • 1
  • J. C. Zieman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Environmental SciencesUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesville
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyBrown UniversityProvidence
  3. 3.Department of Wildlife and Fisheries SciencesTexas A & M UniversityCollege Station

Personalised recommendations