Advertisement

Folia Geobotanica

, Volume 40, Issue 2–3, pp 243–260 | Cite as

Dormancy and germination of sixRhinanthus species in relation to climate

  • Siny J. Ter Borg
Article

Abstract

The genusRhinanthus (Orobanchaceae) consists of annual hemiparasites that occur in a wide range of climates. Patterns of dormancy and germination were studied for six species sampled in areas ranging from the Pyrenees to Northern Scandinavia, and from sea level up to about 2500 m altitude in the Alpine region. Dormancy was broken by a 2 to 6 months period of cold stratification. Optimal temperature and length of the stratification period appeared to vary between and within species.

Two patterns of dormancy and germination were distinguished. Seeds of the first group, including the widely distributedR. minor andR. angustifolius, further referred to as the LW group, require a relatively long period of cold stratification. Moreover, their germination is accelerated if they are subjected to a widening range of higher temperatures in the last weeks of the stratification period. In the other species (R. alectorolophus, R. glacialis, R. mediterraneus and perhapsR. antiquus) the release of dormancy is completed in a rather short period. Higher temperatures in the last weeks of the stratification period hardly affect the germination process of this SN-group, with short dormancy and no accelerated germination at higher temperatures. In both groups, temperatures above the low values during stratification reduce germination percentages and induce secondary dormancy in non-germinated seeds. The effects strongly vary with timing and temperature.

The patterns have a genetic basis and seem to be species-specific. They do not vary with climate conditions, since samplesR. minor, whether collected in sub-arctic or sub-alpine areas or at sea level, generally react according to the LW pattern, and samples ofR. alectorolophus from areas at sea level up to montane regions according to the SN one.

The ecological significance of the various stratification requirements and effects of higher temperatures on germination is discussed in relation to the local climate of the species and the evolutionary history of the genus.

Keywords

After-ripening Cold stratification Low temperature Orobanchaceae Scrophulariaceae Secondary dormancy 

Electronic appendix (www.ibot.cas.cz/folia)

Table 2 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baskin C.C. &Baskin J.M. (1998):Seeds. Ecology, biogeography, and evolution of dormancy and germination. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
  2. Bekker R.M. &Kwak M.M. (2005): Life-history traits as predictors of plant rarity, with particular reference to hemiparasiticOrobanchaceae.Folia Geobot. 40: 231–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bourget F. (1964): Remarques sur les conditions de germination et sur les liaisons phytosociologiques desRhinanthus minor Ehrh. etBurnati (Chabert)Soó.Bull. Soc. Bot. France 111: 120–126Google Scholar
  4. Bourget F. (1965): Sur la germination et le développement de quelques espèces du genreRhinanthus L.Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris 260: 2037–2040.Google Scholar
  5. Bouwmeester H.J. &Karssen C.M. (1992): The dual role of temperature in the regulation of the seasonal changes in dormancy and germination of seeds ofPolygonum persicaria L.Oecologia 90: 88–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bouwmeester H.J. &Karssen C.M. (1993): Annual changes in dormancy and germination of seeds ofSisymbrium officinale (L.)Scop.New Phytol. 124: 179–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Campion-Bourget F. (1983): La germination des graines des espèces Françaises deRhinanthus L.Rev. Cytol. Biol. Vég. 6: 15–94.Google Scholar
  8. de Hullu E., Brouwer T. &ter Borg S.J. (1985): Analysis of the demography ofRhinanthus angustifolius populations.Acta Bot. Neerl. 34: 5–22.Google Scholar
  9. Gibson C.C. &Watkinson A.R. (1991): Host selectivity and the mediation of competition by the root hemiparasiteRhinanthus minor.Oecologia 86: 81–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grime J.P., Hodgson J.G. &Hunt R. (1988):Comparative plant ecology — a functional approach to common British species. Unwin-Hyman, London.Google Scholar
  11. Hartl D. (1974):Scrophulariaceae; Rhinanthus. In:Hegi G.,Illustrierte Flora von Mittel-Europa 6/1, Carl Hanser Verlag, Munchen, pp. 374–403.Google Scholar
  12. Heinricher E. (1898): Die grünen Halbschmarotzer. II.Euphrasia, Alectorolophus undOdontites.Jahrb. Wiss. Bot. 32: 389–452.Google Scholar
  13. Hodgson J.F. (1973):Aspects of carbon nutrition of angiospermous parasites. PhD Thesis, University of Sheffield, Sheffield.Google Scholar
  14. Jensen K. (2004): Dormancy patterns, germination ecology, and seed-bank types of twenty temperate fen grassland species.Wetlands 24: 152–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Karlsson T. (1974): Recurrent ecotypic variation inRhinantheae andGentianaceae in relation to hemiparasitism and mycotrophy.Bot. Not. 127: 527–539.Google Scholar
  16. Kelly D. (1989): Demography of short-lived plants in chalk grassland. I. Life cycle variation in annuals and strict biennials.J. Ecol. 77: 747–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Koch L. (1889): Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Rhinanthaceen (Rhinanthus minor Ehrh.).Jahrb. Wiss. Bot. 20: 1–37.Google Scholar
  18. Koch L. (1891): Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Rhinanthaceen (IIEuphrasia officinalis L.).Jahrb. Wiss. Bot. 22: 1–34.Google Scholar
  19. Kwak M.M. (1979): Effects of bumblebee visits on the seed set ofPedicularis, Rhinanthus andMelampyrum (Scrophulariaceae) in The Netherlands.Acta Bot. Neerl. 28: 177–195.Google Scholar
  20. Magda D., Duru M. &Theau J.-P. (2004): Defining management rules for grasslands using weed demographic characteristics.Weed Sci. 52: 339–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McCullagh P. &Nelder J.A. (1989):Generalized linear models. Chapman and Hall, London, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Meusel H., Jäger E., Remschert S. &Weinert E. (1978a):Vergleichende Chorologie der Zentral Europäischen Flora, Bd II, Karten. VEB Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena.Google Scholar
  23. Meusel H., Jäger E., Remschert S. &Weinert E. (1978b):Vergleichende Chorologie der Zentral Europäischen Flora, Bd II, Text. VEB Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena.Google Scholar
  24. Olmstead R.G., DePamphilis C.W., Wolfe A.D., Young N.D., Elisons W.J. &Reeves P.A. (2001): Disintegration of theScrophulariaceae.Amer. J. Bot. 88: 348–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pons T.L. (1991): Dormancy, germination and mortality of seeds in a chalk-grassland flora.J. Ecol. 79: 765–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Soó R. v. &Webb D.A. (1972):Melampyrum L. In:Tutin T.G. et al. (eds.),Flora Europaea 3, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 253–257.Google Scholar
  27. Sperlich A. (1919): Die Fähigkeit der Linienerhalting (phyletische Potenz), ein auf die Nachkommenschaft von Saisonpflanzen mit festem Rhythmus ungleichmässig übergehender Faktor. Auf Grund von Untersuchungen über die Keimungsenergie, Rhythmik und Variabilität in reinen Linien vonAlectorolophus hirsutus All.Sitzungsber. Akad. Wiss. Wien, Math.-Naturwiss. Kl., Abt. I, 128: 379–476.Google Scholar
  28. Sperlich A. (1956): Die Fortpflanzungstüchtigkeit (phyletische Potenz) des Fremdbefrüchters. Nach Versuchen mit drei Formen desAlectorolophius hirsutus (Lam.)All.Sitzungsber. Akad. Wiss. Wien, Math.-Naturwiss. Kl., Abt. I, 165: 1–80.Google Scholar
  29. Sterneck J. (1901): Monographie der GattungAlectorolophus.Abh. K.K. Zool.-Bot. Ges. Wien 1: 1–150.Google Scholar
  30. Sterneck J. (1913): Ein neuerAlectorolophus vom Südabfall der Schweizer Alpen.Oesterr. Bot. Z. 63: 109–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. ter Borg S.J. (1972):Variability of Rhinanthus serotinus (Schönh.)Oborny in relation to the environment. PhD Thesis University of Groningen, Groningen.Google Scholar
  32. ter Borg S.J. (1985): Population biology and habitat relations of some hemiparasiticScrophulariaceae. In:White J. (ed.),The population structure of vegetation, Junk, Dordrecht, pp. 463–487.Google Scholar
  33. ter Borg S.J. (1987): Qualitative and quantitative aspects of the interaction betweenRhinanthus andOrobanche species and their hosts. In:Weber H.-C. &Forstreuter W. (eds.),Parasitic flowering plants, Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Parasitic Flowering Plants, Marburg, pp. 109–120.Google Scholar
  34. Tiagi B. (1966): Development of the seed and fruit inRhinanthus major andR. serotinus.Amer. J. Bot. 53: 645–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vallance K.B. (1952): The germination of the seeds ofRhinanthus crista-galli.Ann. Bot. (London) N.S. 16: 409–420.Google Scholar
  36. van Hulst R., Shipley B. &Thériault A. (1987): Why isRhinanthus minor (Scrophulariaceae) such a good invader?Canad. J. Bot. 65: 2373–2379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. van Hulst R., Thériault A. &Shipley B. (1986): The systematic position of the genusRhinanthus (Scrophulariaceae) in North America.Canad. J. Bot. 64: 1443–1449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vleeshouwers L.M., Bouwmeester H.J. &Karssen C.M. (1995): Redefining seed dormancy: An attempt to integrate physiology and ecology.J. Ecol. 83: 1031–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Weber H. C. (1981): Untersuchungen an parasitischen Scrophulariaceen (Rhinanthoideen) in Kultur. I. Keimung und Entwicklungsweise.Flora 171: 23–38.Google Scholar
  40. Westbury D.B. (2004):Rhinanthus minor L. Biological flora of the British Isles.J. Ecol. 92: 906–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zopfi H.-J. (1992):Saisonale Ökotypen von drei Rhinanthus-Arten: Saisonpolytypie als Ausdruck von parallelen morphologischen und phänologischen Differenzierungen und ihren Beziehungen zum Standort. PhD. Thesis University of Zürich, Zürich.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Botany 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Group Nature Conservation and Plant Ecology, Department of Environmental SciencesWageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations