Local plant species richness increases with regional habitat commonness across a gradient of forest productivity
- 51 Downloads
We tested the prediction that forest habitat types with relatively high productivity are not only relatively low in species richness but are also regionally uncommon. This relationship was supported by an analysis of data from 146 forest communities in southern Ontario, Canada. Potential forest habitat productivity was determined based on a classification scheme developed for the Canadian Land Inventory (CLI) project. Vascular plant species richness approximated a unimodal distribution across forest productivity classes with the lowest mean species richness recorded for the two most productive classes. The contemporary regional commonness of forest habitat productivity classes were also displayed as a unimodal frequency distribution. Hence, mean species richness per CLI class was positively correlated with the regional area of land encompassing each of these productivity classes and this relationship was increasingly significant at increasingly larger spatial scales of regional CLI class land areas. These results are consistent with the species pool hypothesis, which postulates that species richness is relatively low in highly productive habitats because such habitats have been relatively uncommon in both space and time and hence, have had relatively little historical opportunity for the origination of adapted species.
KeywordsForest productivity Habitat commonness Species diversity Species pool hypothesis
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bolen E.G. (1998):Ecology of North America. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
- Brown S.L. &Schroeder P.E. (1999): Spatial patterns of above-ground production and mortality of woody biomass for eastern U.S. forests.Ecol. Appl. 9: 968–980.Google Scholar
- Department of Regional Economic Expansion (1970):The Canada land inventory: land capability classification for forestry. Report No. 4, Queen’s Printer for Canada, Ottawa.Google Scholar
- Environment Canada (1965):The Canada land inventory: objectives, scope and organization. Report No. 1, Queen’s Printer for Canada, Ottawa.Google Scholar
- Gleason H.A. &Cronquist A. (1991):Manual of the vascular plants of northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. The New York Botanical Garden, New York.Google Scholar
- Grime J.P. (1979):Plant strategies and vegetation processes. Wiley & Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
- Hills G.A. (1957):A ready reference to the description of the land of Ontario and its productivity: a compendium of maps, charts, tables and brief comments. Division of research, Ontario department of lands and forests, Maple.Google Scholar
- Huston M.A. (1994):Biological diversity: the coexistence of species on changing landscapes. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Lee H., Bakowsky W., Riley J., Bowles J., Puddister M., Uhlig P. &McMurray S. (1998):Ecological land classification for southern Ontario: first approximation and its application. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, North Bay.Google Scholar
- Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food (1977):Ontario soils: physical, chemical and biological properties and soil management practices. Publication No. 492, University of Guelph, Guelph.Google Scholar
- Tilman D. (1982):Resource competition and community structure. Princeton University Press, New Jersey.Google Scholar