Advertisement

Journal of Coastal Conservation

, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 125–134 | Cite as

An integrated approach to mangrove dynamics and management

  • Berger Uta Email author
  • Glaser Marion 
  • Koch Boris 
  • Krause Gesche 
  • Lara Rubén 
  • Saint-Paul Ulrich 
  • Schories Dirk 
  • Wolff Matthias 
Special Features in Coastal Conservation 4

Abstract

The main objective of the MADAM project (Mangrove Dynamics and Management) is to generate the scientific basis enabling the sustainable stewardship of the resources of the Caeté mangrove estuary in Northeast Brazil in the sense of integrated coastal (zone) management. To achieve this, it is necessary to acquire in-depth knowledge of natural processes as well as of the relevant institutional, cultural, economic, social and political dynamics. Causal linkages within the ecosystem, as well as between ecosystem, economy and society, are analysed and explained via dynamic and trophic modelling. Scenario construction is intended to forecast the effects of acute or chronic interference on utilized resources, and to answer wider, management-related questions (e.g. restoration of destroyed areas, utilization potential for aquaculture). This paper describes the project strategy as developed and modified in the context of research results from the initial 2-yr project phase. It is argued that a continuous discussion process is essential to assess the validity of the strategies formulated at the beginning of a medium-time project, particularly if the project is of interdisciplinary nature.

Keywords

Brazil Caeté estuary Coastal zone Transdisciplinary research 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adger, W.N. 1997. Sustainability and social resilience in coastal resource use.CSERGE Working Paper GEC 97-23. University of East Anglia, London.Google Scholar
  2. Akashi, Y. & Mueller-Dombois, D. 1995. A landscape perspective of the Hawaiian rain forest dieback. J. Veg. Sci. 6: 449–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baird, D. & Ulanowicz, R.E. 1993. Comparative study on the trophic structure cycling and ecosystem properties of four tidal estuaries.Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 99: 221–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berger, U. & Glaser, M. In press. Unwissenheit und Risiko beom Management von Mangrovengebieten am Beispiel der Halbinsel von Bragança an der Küste von Nord-Ost Pará, Brasilien. In: Brackling, B., Müller, F. & Matthes, K. (eds.) Handbuch der Naturwissenschaften. Ecomed Verlag, Landsberg.Google Scholar
  5. Feeny, D.F., McCay, B.J. & Ackeson, J.M. 1990. The tragedy of the commons—Twenty-two years later.Human Ecol. 18: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Christensen, V. & Pauly, D. (eds.) 1993.Trophic models of aquatic ecosystems. ICLARM Conference Proceedings 26, pp. 1–390. Manilla.Google Scholar
  7. Drude de Lacerda, L. et al. 1993. Ecosistemas de manglar de América latina y el Cariba: Sinopsis. In:Conservación y aprovechamiento sostenible de bosques de manglar en las regiones América Latina y Africa. Contr. International Society for Mangrove Ecosystems, pp. 1–30. Okinawa.Google Scholar
  8. Friedrichs, J. 1980.Methoden empirischer Sozialforschung. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen.Google Scholar
  9. Kjerfve, B. & de Lacerda, L.D. 1993. Mangroves of Brazil. In: de Lacerda, L.D. (ed.)Mangrove ecosystems technical reports ITTO TS-13(2): 245–272.Google Scholar
  10. Lugo, A.E. & Snedaker, S.C. 1974: The ecology of mangroves.Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 5: 39–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mazda, Y., Sato, Y., Sawamoto, S., Yokochi, H. & Wolanski, E. 1990. Links between physical, chemical and biological processes in Bashita-minato, a mangrove swamp in Japan.Estuar. Coastal Shelf Sc. 31: 817–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mueller-Dombois, D. 1987. Natural dieback in forests.BioScience 37: 575–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mueller-Dombois, D. 1991. The mosaic theory and the spatial dynamics of natural dieback and regeneration in Pacific forests. In: The mosaic-cycle concept of ecosystems. Springer-Verlag.Ecol. Stud. 85: 46–60.Google Scholar
  14. Özhan, E. 1998. Estuaries and coastal waters: research and management-Introduction.J. Coastal Conserv. 4: 2–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Remmert, H. 1991. The mosaic-cycle concept of ecosystems. In:Ecol. Stud. 85: 1–12.Google Scholar
  16. Rutledge, R.W., Bacore, B.L. & Mulholland, R.J. 1976. Ecological stability: aninformation theory viewpoint.J. Theor. Biol. 57: 355–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Thom, B. 1984. Coastal landforms and geomorphic processes. In: Snedaker, S.& J. (eds.)The mangrove ecosystem: research methods. UNESCO, Paris.Google Scholar
  18. Twilley, R.R. 1996. The significance of nutrient distribution and regeneration to the recovery of mangrove ecosystems of South Florida in response to hurricane Andrew.Report University of Southwestern Louisiana, Lafayette, LA.Google Scholar
  19. Ulanowicz, R.E. 1986.Growth and development: ecosystems phenomenology. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Ulanowicz, R.E. & Mann, K.H. 1981. Ecosystems under stress. In: Platt, T., Mann, K.H. & Ulanowicz, R.E. (eds.)Mathematical models in biological oceanography, pp. 133–137. UNESCO Press, Paris.Google Scholar
  21. Vivian, J. 1990. Foundations for sustainable development: participation, empowerment and local resource management. In: Vivian J. (ed)Peoples participation in grass-roots environmental movements. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  22. Wolanski, E. 1995. Transport of sediment in mangrove swamps.Hydrobiologia 295: 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wolff, M. 1994. A trophic model for tongoy bay—a system exposed to suspended scallop culture (Northern Chile).J. Exp. Mar. Ecol. Biol. 182: 149–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wolff, M., Hartmann, H. & Koch, V. 1996. A trophic model for Golfo Dulce, a fjord-like tropical embayment, Costa Rica.Rev. Biol. Trop. 44: 215–231.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© EUCC; Opulus Press Uppsala 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Berger Uta 
    • 1
    Email author
  • Glaser Marion 
    • 1
  • Koch Boris 
    • 1
  • Krause Gesche 
    • 1
  • Lara Rubén 
    • 1
  • Saint-Paul Ulrich 
    • 1
  • Schories Dirk 
    • 1
  • Wolff Matthias 
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Tropical Marine EcologyBremenGermany

Personalised recommendations