Journal of Coastal Conservation

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 69–80 | Cite as

Ecological effects of dumping of dredged sediments; options for management

  • Essink Karel 


Dredging and dumping of dredged sediments in estuarine and coastal waters may lead to increased turbidity and enhanced sediment deposition at dump sites. This mainly affects primary production by phytoplankton, performance of visual predators (e.g. fish, birds), and growth and survival of benthic organisms. This paper combines a compilation of literature information and results of additional experimental studies on the effect of enhanced concentrations of suspended matter (SPM) on growth of bivalve molluscs, and on survival of macro- and meiozoobenthos after dumping of dredged sediments. Furthermore, it focuses on non-toxic dredged sediments only.

Release of nutrients from dredged sediments did, so far, hardly influence estuarine phytoplankton production. Increased turbidity may affect dab as well as prey location by sandwich terns. Enhanced SPM-concentrations are unfavourable for young herring and smelt. Growth of filter-feeding bivalves may be impaired, especially at SPM-concentrations >250 mg/l. Estuarine nematodes can survive burial by 10 cm of dumped dredged sediment provided that its physical characteristics are similar to those of the original sediment. Sessile benthos organisms such as mussels and oysters can cope with sediment deposition of only 1–2 cm. Other macrozoobenthos can survive sediment deposition of 20–30 cm. Recovery of benthos at a dump site will occur if the interval between successive dumpings is sufficiently long.

Options for management of dumping of dredged sediments are described, relating to different locations of dump sites in estuarine and coastal waters, to different seasons, and to the actual use (area and frequency) of dump sites.


Birds Dredge spoil Eelgrass Ems Estuary Fish Macrozoobenthos Meiofauna SPM Wadden Sea 



Suspended matter


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anon. 1985.Biological research Ems-Dollard estuary. BOEDE, Rijkswaterstaat Communications Nr. 40/1985.Google Scholar
  2. Admiraal, W. & Peletier, H. 1979 Sulphide tolerance of benthic diatoms in relation to their distribution in an estuary.Brit. Phycol. J. 14: 185–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bach, H.K., Rasmussen, E.K. & Riber, H.H. 1992. The application of an ecological model to assess the impact of sediment spill on benthic vegetation. In: Bjšrnestad, E., Hagerman, L. & Jensen, K. (eds.)Proc. 12th Baltic Marine Biologists Symposium, Helsingör, Denmark, 25–30 August 1991, pp. 7–15. Olsen and Olsen, Fredensborg.Google Scholar
  4. Bach, H.K., Jensen, K. & Lyngby, J.E. 1997. Management of marine construction works using ecological modelling.Est. Coast. Shelf Sci. 44 (suppl. A): 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baretta, J. & Ruardy, P. 1988.Tidal flat estuaries. Simulation and analysis of the Ems estuary. Ecological Studies, No. 71, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  6. Bender, K. & Jensen, K. 1992. The effect of the construction works at the Great Belt link on mussel (Mytilus edulis) beds. In: Bjšrnestad, E. Hagerman, L. & Jensen, K. (eds.)Proc. of the 12th Baltic Marine Biologists Symposium, Helsingör, Denmark, 25–30 August 1991, pp. 17–22. Olsen and Olsen, Fredensborg.Google Scholar
  7. Beukema, J.J. & de Vlas, J. 1989. Tidal current transport of thread-drifting postlarval juveniles of the bivalveMacoma balthica from the Wadden Sea to the North Sea.Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 52: 193–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bouwman, L.A. 1983. A survey of nematodes from the Ems Estuary. Part II: Species assemblages and associations.Zool. Jahrb. Abt. Syst. Geogr. Biol. Tiere 110: 345–376.Google Scholar
  9. CadŽe, G.C. & Hegeman, J. 1974. Primary produktion of phytoplankton in the Dutch Wadden Sea.Neth. J. Sea Res. 8: 240–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. CadŽe, G.C. 1976. Sediment reworking byArenicola marina on tidal flats in the Dutch Wadden Sea.Neth. J. Sea Res. 10: 440–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. CadŽe, G.C. 1979. Sediment reworking by the polychaeteHeteromastus filiformis on a tidal flat in the Dutch Wadden Sea.Neth. J. Sea Res. 13: 441–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carritt, C.E. & Goodgal, S. 1954. Sorption reactions and some ecological implications.Deep Sea Res. 1: 224–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chervin, M. 1978. Assimilation of particulate organic carbon by estuarine and coastal copepods.Mar. Biol. 49: 265–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Colijn, F. 1982. Light absorption in the waters of the Ems-Dollard estuary and its consequences for the growth of phytoplankton and microphytobenthos.Neth. J. Sea Res. 15: 196–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Colijn, F. & de Jonge, V.N. 1984. Primary production of microphytobenthos in the Ems-Dollard estuary.Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 14: 185–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. DeGroodt, E.G. & De Jonge, V.N. 1990. Effect of changes in turbidity and phosphate influx on the ecosystem of the Ems estuary as obtained by a computer simulation model.Hydrobiologia 195: 39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. de Jonge, V.N. 1983. Relations between annual dredging activities, SPM-concentrations and the development of the tidal regime in the Ems estuary.Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 40 (Suppl. 1): 289–300.Google Scholar
  18. de Jonge, V.N. 1990. Response of the Dutch Wadden Sea ecosystem to phosphorus discharges from the River Rhine.Hydrobiologia 195: 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. de Jonge, V.N. & de Jong, D.J. 1992. Role of tide, light and fisheries in the decline ofZostera marina L. in the Dutch Wadden Sea. In: Dankers, N., Smit, C.J. & Scholl, M. (eds.)Proc. 7th Int. Wadden Sea Symposium, Ameland 1990, Netherlands Institute for Sea Research-Publ. Series No. 20-1992: 161–176.Google Scholar
  20. de Jonge, V.N. & Engelkes, M.M. 1993. The role of mineral compounds and chemical conditions in the binding of phosphate in the Ems estuary.Neth. J. Aquat. Ecol. 27: 227–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. de Jonge, V.N. & Postma, H. 1974. Phosphorus compounds in the Wadden Sea.Neth. J. Sea Res. 8: 139–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. de Jonge, V.N. & Villerius, L. A. 1989. Possible role of carbonate dissolution in estuarine phosphate dynamics.Limnol. Oceanogr. 34: 332–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. de Jonge, V.N., Essink, K. & Boddeke, R. 1993. the Wadden Sea—a changed ecosystem.Hydrobiologia 265: 45–71Google Scholar
  24. de Kok, J.H. 1992. A three-dimensional finite difference model for computation of a near- and far-field transport of SPM near a river mouth.Cont. Shelf Res. 12: 625–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. de Kok, J.H. 1995.Numerical modelling of transport processes in coastal waters. Doctoral Thesis, University of Utrecht.Google Scholar
  26. de Vries, I., Smaal, A.C., Nienhuis, P.H. & Joordens, J.C.A. 1996. Estuarine management strategies and the predictability of ecosystem changes.J. Coast. Conserv. 2: 139–148.Google Scholar
  27. Essink, K. & Beukema, J.J. 1991. Long-term changes in intertidal and shallow-subtidal sedimentary zoobenthos. Review of work carried out within the framework of COST 647. In: Keegan, B.F. (ed.)Space and time series data in coastal benthic ecology. An analytical exercise organised within the framework of the COST 647 Project on coastal benthic ecology, pp. 43–64. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels.Google Scholar
  28. Essink, K. 1996. Effects of dredge spoil disposal on macrozoobenthos; a review of studies in The Netherlands. In: Leuchs, H., Anlauf, A. & Nehring, S. (eds.)Baggern und Verklappen im Küstenbereich. Auswirkungen auf das Makrozoobenthos, pp. 12–17. Mitt. Nr. 11, Bundesanstalt fŸr GewŠsserkunde, Koblenz, September 1996.Google Scholar
  29. Essink, K. & Bos, A.H. 1985. Growth of three bivalve molluscs transplanted along the axis of the Ems Estuary.Neth. J. Sea Res. 19: 45–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Essink, K., Steyaert, F.H.I.M., Mulder, H.P.J., de Jonge, V.N., van Heuvel, T. & van den Bergs, J. 1992. Effects of dredging activities in the Ems Estuary and Dutch Wadden Sea. In: Dankers, N., Smit, C.J. & Scholl, M. (eds.)Proc. of the 7th Int. Wadden Sea Symposium, Ameland, The Netherlands, 22–26 October 1990. Netherlands Institute of Sea Research, Publ. Series No. 1992-20: 243–246.Google Scholar
  31. Essink, K., Tydeman, P., De Koning, F. & Kleef, H.L. 1989. On the adaptation of the musselMytilus edulis L. to different SPM concentrations. In: Klekowski, R.Z. Styczynska-Jurewicz, E. & Falkowski, L. (eds.)Proc. 21st European Marine Biology Symposium 15–19 Sept. 1986, Gdansk, Poland, pp. 41–51. Polish Academy of Sciences, Inst. of Oceanology, Gdansk.Google Scholar
  32. Fonds, M. 1978. The seasonal distribution of some fish species in the western Dutch Wadden Sea. In: Dankers, N., Wolff, W.J. & Zijlstra, J.J. (eds.)Fishes and fisheries of the Wadden Sea, pp. 42–77. Balkema, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  33. Gallenne, B. 1990. Case studies on dumping in estuary zones: Loire estuary. In: Alzieu, C. & Gallenne, B. (eds.)Proc. of the Int. Seminar on the Environmental Aspects of Dredging Activities, Nantes, 27 Nov.–1 Dec. 1989, pp. 283–301.Google Scholar
  34. Giesen, W.B.J.T., van Katwijk, M.M. & den Hartog, C. 1990. Eelgrass condition and turbidity in the Dutch Wadden Sea.Aquat. Bot. 37: 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Harper, M.A. 1977. Movements. In: Werner, D. (ed.)The biology of diatoms, pp. 224–249. Blackwell Scientific Publishers, Oxford.Google Scholar
  36. Hawkins, A.J.S., Smith, R.F.M. Bayne, B.L. & HŽral, M. 1996. Novel observations underlying the fast growth of suspension-feeding shellfish in turbid environments:Mytilus edulis.Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 131: 179–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Huys, S.W.E. 1995.Geomorphological development of the intertidal in the Westerschelde 1935–1989. Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research, Utrecht. Report R 95-3. (In Dutch.)Google Scholar
  38. Kamermans, P. 1994. Similarity in food source and timing of feeding in deposit-and suspension-feeding bivalves.Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 104: 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Laane, R.W.P.M., Etcheber, H. & Relexans, J.C. 1987. Particulate organic matter in estuaries and its ecological implication for macrobenthos.Mitt. Geol.-Paläont. Inst. Univ. Hamburg, SCOPE/UNEP Sconderband 64: 71–91.Google Scholar
  40. Manuels, M.W. & Postma, H. 1974. Measurements of ATP and organic carbon in SPM of the Dutch Wadden Sea.Neth. J. Sea Res. 8: 292–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McComb, A.J. (ed.) 1995.Eutrophic shallow estuaries and lagoons. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
  42. Mettam, C. 1993. Changing palp morphology ofMytilus edulis along a gradient of turbidity. In: Aldrich, J.C. (ed.)Quantified phenotypic responses in morphology and physiology, Proc. 27th European Marine Biology Symp., Dublin, 7–11 Sept. 1992, pp. 229–237. JAPAGA, Ashford.Google Scholar
  43. M¿hlenberg, F. & Riisg∄rd, H.U. 1978. Efficiency of particle retention in 13 species of suspension feeding bivalves.Ophelia 17: 239–246.Google Scholar
  44. M¿hlenberg, F. & Riisg∄rd, H.U. 1979. Filtration rate, using a new indirect technique, in thirteen species of suspension feeding bivalves.Mar. Biol. 54: 143–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Moore, P.G. 1977. Inorganic particulate suspensions in the sea and their effects on marine animals.Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Annu. Rev. 15: 225–363.Google Scholar
  46. Moritz, H.R. & Randall, R.E. 1995. Simulating dredgedmaterial placement at open-water disposal sites.J. Waterways Port Coastal Ocean Eng. 121: 36–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Neverauskas, V.P. 1987. Accumulation of periphyton biomass on artificial substrates deployed near a sewage sludge outfall in South Australia.Est. Coast. Shelf Sci. 25: 509–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Newell, R.C., Seiderer, L.J. & Hitchcock, D.R. 1998. The impact of dredging works in coastal waters: a review of the sensitivity to disturbance and subsequent recovery of biological resources on the sea bed.Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Annu. Rev. 36: 127–178.Google Scholar
  49. Philippart, C.J.M., Dijkema, K.S., & van der Meer, J. 1992. Wadden Sea seagrasses: where and why? In: Dankers, N., Smit, C.J. & Scholl, M. (eds.)Proc. 7th Int. Wadden Sea Symposium, Ameland 1990, pp. 177–191. Netherlands Institute of Sea Research, Publ. Series No. 20-1992.Google Scholar
  50. Phillips, G.L., Eminson, D. & Moss, B. 1978. A mechanism to account for macrophyte decline in progressively eutrophicated waters.Aquat. Bot. 4: 103–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Postma, H. 1954. Hydrography of the Dutch Wadden Sea.Arch. Neérl. Zool. 10: 405–511.Google Scholar
  52. Postma, H. 1981. Exchange of materials between the North Sea and the Wadden Sea.Mar. Geol. 40: 199–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Prins, T.C. & Smaal, A.C. 1989. Carbon and nitrogen budgets of the musselMytilus edulis L. and the cockleCerastoderma edule (L.) in relation to food quality.Sci. Mar. 53: 477–482.Google Scholar
  54. Rehm, E. 1985. The distribution of phosphorus in the Weser river estuary.Environm. Technol. Lett. 6: 53–64.Google Scholar
  55. Reish, D.J. 1980. Marine and estuarine pollution.J. Water Poll. Contr. Fed. 52: 1533–1575.Google Scholar
  56. Reish, D.J. 1981. Marine and estuarine pollution.J. Water Poll. Contr. Fed. 53: 925–949.Google Scholar
  57. Shepherd, S.A., McComb, A.J., Bulthuis, D.A., Neverauskas, V., Steffensen, D.A. & West, R. 1989. Decline of seagrasses. In: Larkum, A.W.D., McComb, A.J., & Shepherd, S.A. (eds.)Biology of seagrasses. Aquatic Plant Studies 2, pp. 346–393. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  58. Sherk, J.A., OÕConnor, J.M. & Neumann, D.A. 1979. Effects of suspended and deposited sediments on estuarine environments. In: Cronin, L.E., (ed.)Estuarine Research 2, pp. 541–558. Academic Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  59. Theede, H. 1973. Comparative studies on the influence of oxygen deficiency and hydrogen sulphide on marine bottom invertebrates.Neth. J. Sea Res. 7: 44–252.Google Scholar
  60. Theissen, B.F. 1982. Variation in size of gills, labial palps and adductor muscle inMytilus edulis L. (Bivalvia) from Danish waters.Ophelia 21: 49–63.Google Scholar
  61. van Beusekom, J.E.E. & de Jonge, V.N. 1994. The role of SPM in the distribution of dissolved inorganic phosphate, iron and aluminium in the Ems estuary.Neth. J. Aquat. Ecol. 28: 383–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. van Beusekom, J.E.E. & de Jonge, V.N. 1998. Retention of phosphorus and nitrogen in the Ems estuary.Estuaries 21: 527–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Widdows, J., Fieth, P. & Worral, C.M. 1979. Relationship between seston, available food and feeding activity in the common musselMytilus edulis.Mar. Biol. 50: 195–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© EUCC; Opulus Press Uppsala 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water ManagementNational Institute for Coastal and Marine Management/RIKZHarenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations