Comparison of seven DNA extraction and amplification protocols in historical herbarium specimens of juncaceae
- 1.5k Downloads
Seven DNA extraction protocols were used to obtain DNA from herbarium specimens ofJuncus andLuzula (Juncaceae) of various ages. DNA of historical samples is difficult to extract, and the extracts are seldom of good quality. The quality of DNA obtained was estimated by using a spectrophotometer to measure the A260/280 absorbance ratio. The total DNA yield was measured by a fluorometer. The results indicate the success of using both mixer mill grinding and a DNeasy Plant Kit. Another extraction protocol (grinding with mortar and pestle, using liquid nitrogen) yielded DNA from many samples. Modified CTAB extraction, with a lengthy precipitation, usually provided good amounts of DNA. Other protocols did not give satisfactory results.
Key wordscpDNA DNA extraction herbarium specimens Juncaceae Juncus Luzula PCR amplification
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Balsev H (1996) Juncaceae, Flora Neotropica, Monograph 68, pp 167, Organization for Flora Neotropica, The New York Botanical Garden, New York.Google Scholar
- Csaikl UM, Bastian H, Brettschneider R, Gauch S, Meir A, Schauerte M, Scholz F, Sperisen C, Vornam B, and Ziegenhagen B (1998) Comparative analysis of different DNA extraction protocols: A fast, universal maxi-preparation of high quality plant DNA for genetic evaluation and phylogenetic studies. Plant Mol Biol Rep 16: 69–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Doyle JJ and Doyle JL (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quatities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull 19: 11–15.Google Scholar
- Doyle JJ and Doyle JL (1990): Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12/1: 13–15.Google Scholar
- Hiesinger M, Löffert D, Ritt CH, and Oelmüller U (2001) The effects of phenol on nucleic acid preparation and downstream applications. Qiagen News 5: 23–26.Google Scholar
- Jansen RK, Loockerman DJ, and Hyi-Gyung Kim WD (1999) DNA Sampling from Herbarium Material: A Current Perspective. In: Metsger DA and Byers SC (eds) Managing the modern herbarium, An interdisciplinary approach. Society for the preservation of natural history collections, Washington, DC, pp 277–286.Google Scholar
- Metsger DA and Byers SC (1999) Managing the modern herbarium, an interdisciplinary approach. Society for the preservation of natural history collections, Washington DC, pp 384.Google Scholar
- Rogers SO (1994) Phylogenetic and taxonomic information from herbarium and mumified DNA. In: Adams, RP et al. (eds) Conservation of plant genes II.: Utilization of ancient and modern DNA. Miss Bot Gard, Monogr Vol. 48.Google Scholar
- Taylor JW and Swann EC (1994): Dried samples: soft tissues, DNA from herbarium specimens. In: Herrmann, B and Hummel, S. (eds), Ancient DNA- Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
- Ziegenhagen B and Scholz F (1998) Methods for difficult plant species/tissues. In: Karp A, Isaac PG, and Ingram DS, Molecular tools for screening biodiversity., Plants and animals. Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar