Estuaries and Coasts

, Volume 29, Issue 6, pp 972–978

Red mangrove (Rhizophora mangle) reproduction and seedling colonization after hurricane charley: Comparisons of Charlotte Harbor and Tampa Bay

  • C. Edward Proffitt
  • Eric C. Milbrandt
  • Steven E. Travis

DOI: 10.1007/BF02798658

Cite this article as:
Edward Proffitt, C., Milbrandt, E.C. & Travis, S.E. Estuaries and Coasts: J ERF (2006) 29: 972. doi:10.1007/BF02798658


Reproductive aspects of life history are known to be important in recovery following disturbance in many plant species although this has not been well studied in mangroves. Hurricane Charley devastated large areas of mangroves in Charlotte Harbor, Florida, in August 2004. We surveyed 6 forests in Charlotte Harbor (2002, 2003, and 2005) and 16 in Tampa Bay, Florida (2001, 2002, 2003, and 2005) for total numbers of reproducing trees and trees heterozygotic for albinism that produce both normal and albino propagules. Tree size (estimated height and diameter at breast height) was also recorded for sentinel heterozygotic trees. Total number of reproducing trees km−1 was used as an index of reproductive output of the population, and deviation from the 3∶1 (normal:albino propagules) ratio on heterozygotic trees expected with 100% selfing was used to estimate outcrossing. Numbers ofRhizophora mangle reproducing trees km−1 of shoreline in Charlotte Harbor were reduced by an order of magnitude following Hurricane Charley, while numbers of reproducing trees in Tampa Bay were similar to those of previous years. Reduced reproduction in Charlotte Harbor was accompanied by fewer new recruits in plots on Sanibel and Captiva Islands. Numbers of new recruits after the storm also tended to be fewer in plots where canopy loss was greater. More new recruits occurred in sites that had higher densities of pre-stormRhizophora seedlings and greater relative dominance byRhizophora. Outcrossing of sentinel trees was 2.5 times greater, in Charlotte Harbor (mean site−1=33.6±6.7%; with 17% of forest sites completely selfing) than in Tampa Bay (mean site−1=13.4±4.7%; with 40% of sites completely selfing), although the implications for seedling recruitment of this difference are not known.

Copyright information

© Estuarine Research Federation 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Edward Proffitt
    • 1
  • Eric C. Milbrandt
    • 2
  • Steven E. Travis
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Biological Sciences, Florida Atlantic Universityc/o Harbor Branch Oceanographic InstitutionFort Pierce
  2. 2.Sanibel-Captiva Conservation FoundationSanibel
  3. 3.U.S. Geological SurveyNational Wetlands Research CenterLafayette

Personalised recommendations