Estuaries and Coasts

, Volume 29, Issue 6, pp 899–913 | Cite as

Hurricane storm surge simulations for Tampa Bay

Article

Abstract

Using a high resolution, three-dimensional, primitive equation, finite volume coastal ocean model with flooding and drying capabilities, supported by a merged bathymetric-topographic data set and driven by prototypical hurricane winds and atmospheric pressure fields, we investigated the storm surge responses for the Tampa Bay, Florida, vicinity and their sensitivities to point of landfall, direction and speed of approach, and intensity. All of these factors were found to be important. Flooding potential by wind stress and atmospheric pressure induced surge is significant for a category 2 hurricane and catastrophic for a category 4 hurricane. Tide, river, and wave effects are additive, making the potential for flood-induced damage even greater. Since storm surge sets up as a slope to the sea surface, the highest surge tends to occur over the upper reaches of the bay, Old Tampa Bay and Hillsborough Bay in particular. For point of landfall sensitivity, the worst case is when the hurricane center is positioned north of the bay mouth such that the maximum winds associated with the eye wall are at the bay mouth. Northerly (southerly) approaching storms yield larger (smaller) surges since the winds initially set up (set down) water level. As a hybrid between the landfall and direction sensitivity experiments, a storm transiting up the bay axis from southwest to northeast yields the smallest surge, debunking a misconception that this is the worst Tampa Bay flooding case. Hurricanes with slow (fast) translation speeds yield larger (smaller) surges within Tampa Bay due to the time required to redistribute mass.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Blumberg, A. F. andG. L. Mellor. 1987. A description of a three-dimensional coastal ocean circulation model, p. 1–16.In N. Heaps (ed.), Three-dimensional Coastal Ocean Models, Coastal and Estuarine Series Volume 4. American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  2. Bortone, S. A. 2006. Recommendations on Establishing a Research Strategy in the Gulf of Mexico to Assess the Effects of Hurricanes on Coastal Ecosystems.Estuaries and Coasts 29:1062–1066.Google Scholar
  3. Chen, C. S., H. D. Liu, andR. C. Beardsley. 2003. An unstructured, finite-volume, three-dimensional, primitive equation ocean model: Application to coastal ocean and estuaries.Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology 20:159–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen, C. S., R. C. Beardsley, and G. Cowles. 2004. An unstructured grid, finite-volume coastal ocean model: FVCOM user manual. SMAST/UMASSD University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth, Technical Report-04-0601. New Bedford, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  5. Feng, S. Z. 1982. An Introduction to Storm Surge, 1st edition. Science Press, Beijing, China.Google Scholar
  6. Galperin, B., L. H. Kantha, S. Hassid, andA. Rosati. 1988. A quasi-equilibrium turbulent energy model for geophysical flows.Journal of Atmospheric Science 45:55–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hess, K. 2001. Generation of tidal datum fields for Tampa Bay and the New York Bight. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Ocean Service, Technical Report: NOS CS 11. Silver Spring, Maryland.Google Scholar
  8. Holland, G. J. 1980. An analytic model of the wind and pressure profiles in hurricanes.Monthly Weather Review 108:1212–1218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hubbert, G. D. andK. L. McInnes. 1999. A storm surge inundation model for coastal planning and impact studies.Journal of Coastal Research 15:168–185.Google Scholar
  10. Jelesnianski, C. P., J. Chen, and W. A. Shaffer. 1992. SLOSH: Sea, lake, and overland surges from hurricanes. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Technical Report NWS 48. Silver Spring, Maryland.Google Scholar
  11. Large, W. G. andS. Pond. 1981. Open ocean momentum fluxes in moderate to strong winds.Journal of Physical Oceanography 11: 324–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mellor, G. L. andT. Yamada. 1982. Development of a turbulence closure model for geophysical fluid problems.Review of Geophysics 20:851–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Smagorinsky, J. 1963. General circulation experiments with the primitive equations, I: The basic experiment.Monthly Weather Review 91:99–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Weisberg, R. H. andL. Zheng. 2006a. A simulation of the Hurricane Charley storm surge and its breach of North Captiva Island.Florida Scientist 69:152–165.Google Scholar
  15. Weisberg, R. H. andL. Zheng. 2006b. A finite volume coastal ocean model simulation of the tide, buoyancy, and wind-driven circulation of Tampa Bay.Journal of Geophysical Research 111: C01005, doi:10.1029/2005JC003067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Estuarine Research Federation 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Marine ScienceUniversity of South FloridaSt. Petersburg

Personalised recommendations