Lead levels in ancient and contemporary Japanese bones
- 38 Downloads
During the past few centuries, lead production, consumption and emissions, to our total environment have increased remarkably. We have determined the concentrations of lead in 41 well-preserved ancient and 11 contemporary rib bones of a mature age (40–60 y), with a view to historically evaluating lead exposure in humans. The oldest Japanese bones (1000–300b.c.) were found to contain a mean of 0.58 μg Pb/g dry wt and a mean molar ratio of lead to calcium of 0.6×10−6, compared with 4.7–5.2×10−6 in the bones of the Edo era (1600–1867a.d.) and contemporary residents in Japan. The mean molar ratios of female bones were always higher than those of male bones for each era. From this fact we may assume that facial cosmetics were one of the main routes of lead exposure among the ancient Japanese, especially those who lived during the Edo era.
Index EntriesLead levels in ancient bones bone lead levels in Japanese, by era lead concentrations, in ribs lead exposure, in ancient Japanese index of lead exposure lead, in cosmetics and lead burden, in ancient bones
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.WHO,Environmental Health Criteria 3, Lead, WHO, Geneva, pp. 30–65, 1977.Google Scholar
- 2.K. Tsuchiya, inHandbook on the Toxicology of Metals, vol. 2, L. Friberg, G. F. Nordberg, and V. B. Vouk, eds., Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 298–353 (1986).Google Scholar
- 4.P. Grandjean, inEnvironmental Quality and Safety, Supplement Vol. II, T. B. Griffin and J. H. Knelson, eds., Georg Thieme, Stuttgart, 1975, pp. 6–75.Google Scholar
- 11.N. Ishinishi, Y. Eguchi, and A. Hisanaga, inAbstracts of the 19th International Congress on Occupational Health, Dubrovnik, Yugoslavia, 1978, pp. 77.Google Scholar
- 15.Fisher Scientific Co.,Atomic Absorption Analytical Method, no. 9 and no. 37, Waltham, MA, 1970s.Google Scholar
- 21.T. Kuge,Mono to Ningen no Bunkashi 4, Kesho (Make-up), Hosei Univ. Pub., Tokyo, 1970, pp 1–353.Google Scholar
- 22.K. Kato,Am. J. Dis. Child. 44, 569 (1932).Google Scholar