Human development is linked to multiple water body impairments along the California coast
- 152 Downloads
To elucidate relationships between land cover and water quality along the central California coast, we collected monthly samples from 14 coastal waterway outlets representing various degrees of human development. Sites were distributed between three salinity categories, freshwater, estuarine, and marine, to better understand land cover-water quality relationships across a range of coastal aquatic ecosystems. Samples were analyzed for fecal indicator bacteria (FIB), dissolved nutrients, stable nitrogen isotopes in particulate organic matter, and chlorophylla (chla). Sediment samples from 11 sites were analyzed for the concentration of the anthropogenic organic contaminant perfluorooctane sulfonate and its precursors (ΣPFOS). While the data indicated impairment by nutrient, microbial, and organic contaminants at both agricultural and urban sites, the percentage of agricultural land cover was the most robust indicator of impairment, showing significant correlations (p<0.05) to FIB, nutrient, chla, and ΣPFOS levels. FIB densities were strongly influenced by salinity and were highest at sites dominated by agriculture and urbanization. Nutrient levels and chla correlated to both agricultural and urban land use metrics as well. Positive correlations among FIB, nutrients, chla, and ΣPFOS suggest a synergy between microbial, nutrient, and organic pollution. The results emphasize the importance of land management in protecting coastal water bodies and human health, and identify nutrient, microbial, and organic pollution as prevalent problems in coastal California water bodies.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Atlas, E. L., S. W. Hager, L. I. Gordon, and P. K. Park. 1971. A practical manual for the use of the Technicon Auto AnalyzerTM in seawater nutrient analysis (revised). Oregon State University, Department of Oceanography, Technical Report 215, Reference 71-22. Corvallis, Oregon.Google Scholar
- Balarajan, R., V. C. Raleigh, P. Yuen, D. Wheeler, D. Machin, andR. Cartwright. 1991. health risks associated with bathing in sea water.British Medical Journal 303:1444–1445.Google Scholar
- Bartram, J. andG. Rees. 2000. Monitoring bathing waters: A practical guide to the design and implementation of assessments and monitoring programmes, E and FN Spon, London, England.Google Scholar
- Clement, C., S. B. Bricker, and D. E. Pirhalla. 2001. Eutrophic Conditions in Estuarine Waters.In National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's State of the Coast Report. Silver Spring, Maryland. http://state-of-coast.noaa.gov/bulletins/html/eut_18/eut.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Edwards, D. R., M. S. Coyne, T. C. Daniel, P. F. Vendrell, J. F. Murdoch, andP. A. Moore. 1997. Indicator bacteria concentrations of two northwest Arkansas streams in relation to flow and season.Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 40:103–109.Google Scholar
- Kendall, C. 1998. Tracing nitrogen sources and cycling in catchements, p. 519–576.In C. Kendall and J. J. McDonnell (eds.), Isotope Tracers in Catchment Hydrology. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
- Molvaer, J., J. Knutzen, J. Magnusson, B. Rygg, J. Skei, and J. Sorensen. 1997. Environmental quality classifications in fjords and coastal areas. Satens Forurensningstilsyn TA-1467. Oslo, Norway.Google Scholar
- Osborne, L. L. andM. J. Wiley. 1988. Empirical relationships between land use/cover and stream water quality in an agricultural watershed.Journal of Environmental Management 26: 9–27.Google Scholar
- Roth, N. E., M. T. Southerland, D. E. Srebel, andA. Brindley. 1998. Landscape model of cumulative impacts: Phase I report. Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Columbia, Maryland.Google Scholar
- Ryding, S. O. andW. Rast. 1989. Man and the biosphere: The control of eutrophication of lakes and reservoirs, Volume 1. UNESCO, Parthenon Publication Group, Park Ridge, New Jersey.Google Scholar
- Smith, V. H. 1998. Cultural eutrophication of inland, estuarine and coastal waters, p. 7–49.In M. L. Pace and P. M. Groffman (eds.), Successes, Limitations and Frontiers in Ecosystem Science. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2003. Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Dissolved Oxygen, Water Clarity and Chlorophylla for the Chesapeake Bay and its Tidal Tributaries. USEPA, Chesapeake Bay Program Office, Annapolis, Maryland.Google Scholar