Sulle evaporazioni nucleari nei raggi cosmici e l'assorbimento della componente nucleonica
- 11 Downloads
- 4 Citations
Riassunto
Col metodo delle emulsioni sensibili è stato studiato l'assorbimento della radiazione generante le stelle. Questi risultati sono collegati con il comportamento della componente nucleonica; come evidente in base ad alcuni recenti dati sperimentali.
Summary
A large discussion is made on the hypothesis that the primary protons produce an appreciable number of secondary nucleons in the atmosphere due to nuclear processes of elastic and quasi-elastic collisions. This number is evaluated to be between 10 and 15. On the ground of this hypothesis, many experimental data are discussed and a satisfactory interpretation is given. The experimental data are: 1) The data of different Authors about the absorption of the star-producing radiation in air and in various materials. 2) The data of different Authors about the absorption of the hard-showers-producing radiation in air and in various materials. 3)Anderson's and al. andAlikhanian's and al. data for the protonic spectrum at high altitude in the atmosphere. 4)Rossi's and al. data about the burst-producing radiation. 5)Salvini's and al. andFretter's photographs in cloud chamber. 6) Some features of stars in sensive emulsion. Other experimental data will be discussed in the second part of this work.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- (2).G. Bernardini, G. Cortini eA. Manfredini:Phys. Rev.,74, 845 (1948);74, 1878 (1948);G. Cortini, A. Manfredini eA. Persano:Nuovo Cimento,5, 292 (1948);G. Cortini eA. Manfredini:Nature,165, 992 (1949).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- (4).E. P. George:Nature,162, 333 (1948).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- (5).
- (6).G. B. Harding, S. Lattimore, T. T. Li eD. H. Perkins:Nature,163, 319 (1949).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- (7).
- (8).
- (9).
- (10).Comunicazione al Congresso della Am. Phys. Soc., New York, gennaio 1949; vediO. Piccioni:Phys. Rev., in corso di stampa.Google Scholar
- (12).
- (14).W. Heisenberg:Zeits. f. Phys.,101, 533 (1939);113, 61 (1939);Cosmic Radiation (Dover Pubbl., N. Y.), 1946, pag. 124.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- (15).H. W. Lewis, J. R. Oppenheimer eS. A. Wouthuysen:Phys. Rev.,73, 127 (1948).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- (16).G. Wataghin:Phys. Rev.,75, 693 (1949).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- (18).G. Wataghin:Phys. Rev.,71, 453 (1947).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- (19).
- (20).J. Tinlot:Phys. Rev.,73, 1476 (1948).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- (21).
- (22).
- (23).W. B. Fretter: Comunicazione al Congresso della Am. Phys. Soc., Pasadena, Novembre 1949.Google Scholar
- (24).G. Cocconi:Phys. Rev.,75, 1074 (1949).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- (25).
- (27).J. A. Van Allen eH. E. Tatel:Phys. Rev.,73, 245 (1948);A. V. Gangnes, J. F. Jenkins jr. eJ. A. Van Allen:Phys. Rev.,75, 57 (1949).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- (28).B. Rossi:Rev. Mod. Phys.,20, 537 (1948), pag. 574.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- (29).R. V. Adams, C. D. Anderson, P. E. Lloyd, R. R. Rau eR. C. Saxena:Rev. Mod. Phys.,20, 334 (1948).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- (30).
- (33).