Conclusion
The great ethical responsibility for professional technologies may be in the technologies of education and training being the most effictive and the most humane ways of keeping a population in order and productive, The greatest on-the-job challenge is to avoid exaggerating the contribution of technology, particularly information and communication technologies (ICT). Learning, at root, does not require technology. Learners, in turn, do not absolutely need teachers, technologies, and technology, either by day or by night. What students and trainees deserve are the best available instructional experiences.
Keywords
Ethic Technologist Professional Ethic American Educational Research Association TechTrends Volume Instructional Experience
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Abbott, A. (1988).The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Abbott, A. (2001).Time matters: On theory and method. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Ankrum, D. R., & Napper, V. S. (1999). Computers in schools — The USA component.HCI international ’99: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on human-computer interaction, 916–918.Google Scholar
- Becker, H. S. (1995).Howard Becker on education. (R. G. Burgess, Ed.). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Becker, H. S. (1998).Tricks of the trade: How to think about your research while you’re doing it. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Freidson, E. (2001).Professionalism, the third logic: On the practice of knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Greenberg, D. S. (2001).Science, money, and politics: Political triumph and ethical erosion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Kliebard, H. M. (2002).Changing course: American curriculum reform in the 20th century. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Lagemann, E. C. (2000).An elusive science: The troubling history of education research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Mannheim, K. (1951).Man and society in an age of reconstruction. (E. Shils, Trans.). New York: Harcourt, brace and Company.Google Scholar
- Mondale, S., & Patton, S. B. (Eds.). (2001).School: The story of American public education. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
- Napper, V. (2002). Impact of the new education technology standards on USA students.Proceedings of the XVI Annual International Occupational Ergonomics and Safety Conference. Toronto, Canada, June 10–12, 2002. CD ROM.Google Scholar
- Nichols, R. G. (1997). Disempowering Homo Technologus.Bulletin of Science, Technology, & Society, 17 (5 & 6), 297–304.Google Scholar
- Sherry, A. C. (1998). Is a safety policy enough?TechTrends43(3), 17–18.Google Scholar
- Sherry, A. C., & Strojny, A. (1993). Design for safety: The audiovisual cart hazard revisited.Educational Technology, 33(12), 42–47.Google Scholar
- Strike, K. A., Anderson, M. S., Curren, R., van Geel, T., Pritchard, I., & Robertson, E. (2002).Ethical standards of the American Educational Research Association: Cases and commentary. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
- Welliver, P. W. (Ed.). (2001).A code of professional ethics: A guide to professional conduct in the field of educational communications and technology. Bloomington, IN: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer 2004