Journal of Economics and Finance

, Volume 22, Issue 2–3, pp 21–41 | Cite as

A comparative analysis of security pricing using factor, macrovariable and arbitrage pricing models

  • Suat Teker
  • Oscar Varela

Abstract

This study compares and contrasts the single factor, three factor, macrovariable and APT models, using industry portfolios of all available firms on CRSP from 1980 to 1992. Comparatively, the APT is best, macrovariable second best and single factor model worse in pricing securities. Consistently, the market variable is cross sectionally priced in all models, and two of four APT factors capture the majority of variance in industry returns. In the latter case, factor three is ***DIRECT SUPPORT *** A00DH002 00002 consistently related to market returns, and factors two and three are also associated with risk premiums and exchange rates after 1987. Factor four is not related to any macrovariable, and term structure and production are never related to any risk factor.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Born, J.A. and J.T. Moser, “An Investigation Into the Role of the Market Portfolio in the Arbitrage Pricing Theory,”Financial Review, Vol. 23, No. 3 (August 1988), 287–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chamberlain, G. and M. Rothschild, “Arbitrage Factor Structure, and Mean-Variance Analysis on Large Asset Markets,” Econometrica, Vol. 51 (1983), 1281–1304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chang, S.J., “A Study of Empirical Return Generating Models: A Market Model, A Multifactor Model, and A Unified Model,”Journal of Business, Finance and Accounting, Vol. 18, No. 3 (April 1991), 377–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen, Nai-Fu and Jonathan E. Ingersoll, Jr., “Exact Pricing in Linear Factor Models with Finitely Many Assets: A Note,”Journal of Finance, Vol. 38, No. 3 (1983), 985–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, Nai-Fu, Richard Roll and Stephen A. Ross, “Economic Factors and the Stock Market,”Journal of Business, Vol. 59, No. 3 (July 1986), 383–403.Google Scholar
  6. Chen, Su-Jane and Bradford D. Jordan, “Some Empirical Tests in the Arbitrage Pricing Theory: Macrovariable vs Derived Factors,”Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 17 (1993), 65–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cho, D.C. and Edwin J. Elton and Martin J. Gruber, “On the Robustness of Roll and Ross APT,”Journal Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 19(1), 1984, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Choi, Jongmoo Jay and Elyas Elyasiani and Kenneth J. Kopecky, “The Sensitivity of Bank Stock Returns to Market, Interest and Exchange Rate Risk,”Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol. 16, No. 5 (September 1992), 983–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Connor, Gregory, “A Unified Beta Theory,”Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 34 (1984), 13–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Connor, Gregory, “The Three types of Factor Models: A Comparison of Their Explanatory Power,”Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 51, No. 3 (May/June 1995), 42–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davidson, R. and J. Mackinnon, “Several Tests for Model Specification in the Presence of Alternative Hypotheses,”Econometrica, May 1981, 781–793.Google Scholar
  12. Fama, Eugene F. and James D. MacBeth, “Long-term Growth in a Short-term Market,”Journal of Finance, (1974), pp. 857–885.Google Scholar
  13. Fama, Eugene F. and James D. MacBeth, “Risk, Return and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests,”Journal of Political Economy, (1973), pp. 607–636.Google Scholar
  14. Gilberto, Michael, “Interest Rate Sensitivity in the Common Stocks of Financial Intermediaries: A Methodological Note,”Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 20, No. 1 (March 1985), 123–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harris, John M. and M. Wayne Marr and Michael F. Spivey, “Exchange Rate Movements and Stock Returns of U.S. Commercial Banks,”Journal of Business Research, Vol. 22, No. 3 (May 1991), 233–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ingersoll, Jonathan, “Some Results in the Theory of Arbitrage Pricing,”Journal of Finance, Vol. 39 (1984), 1021–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jorion, Philippe, “The Pricing of Exchange Rate Risk in the Stock Market,”Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 26, No. 3 (September 1991), 363–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kim, M.K. and C. Wu, “Macro-Economic Factors and Stock returns,”Journal of Financial Research, Vol. 10(2), Summer 1987, 87–98.Google Scholar
  19. Otuteye, E., “A Bilinear Paradigm Test of the Arbitrage Pricing Theory,”International Review of Economics and Finance, Vol. 1(3), 1992, 203–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pettway, R.H. and B.D. Jordan, “APT vs CAPM Estimates of the Return-Generating Functions Parameters for Regulated Utilities,”Journal of Financial Research, Vol. 10(3), Fall 1987, 227–238.Google Scholar
  21. Roll, Richard and Stephen A. Ross, “An Empirical Investigation of the Arbitrage Pricing Theory,”Journal of Finance, Vol. 35, No. 5 (December 1980), 1073–1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ross, Stephen A., “The Arbitrage Theory of Capital Asset Pricing,”Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 13 (1976), 341–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ross, Stephen A., “An Empirical Investigation of the Arbitrage Pricing Theory,”Journal of Finance, Vol. 35, No. 5 (1980), 1073–1103.Google Scholar
  24. Ross, Stephen A. and Philip H. Dybvig, “Yes, The APT is Testable,”Journal of Finance, Vol. 40, No. 4 (1985), 1173–1188.Google Scholar
  25. Shanken, Jay, “The Arbitrage Pricing Theory: Is it Testable?,”Journal of Finance, Vol. 37, No. 5 (December 1982), 1129–1140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stone, Bernell K., “Systematic Interest-Rate Risk in a Two-Index Model of Returns,”Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 9 (November 1974), 709–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Theil, H.,Applied Economic Forecasting (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 1966.Google Scholar
  28. Wei, K.C. John, “An Asset-Pricing Theory Unifying the CAMP and APT,”Journal of Finance, Vol. 63, No. 4 (September 1988), 881–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Weinstein, Mark I. and Stephen J. Brown, “A New Approach to Testing Asset Pricing Models: The Bilinear Paradigm,”Journal of Finance, Vol. 38, No. 3 (1983), 711–743.Google Scholar
  30. Weinstein, Mark I. and Stephen J. Brown, “Derived Factors in Event Studies,”Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 14, No. 3 (1985), 491–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Suat Teker
    • 1
  • Oscar Varela
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of ManagementIstanbul Technical UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Economics and FinanceUniversity of New OrleansNew Orleans

Personalised recommendations