Advertisement

AV communication review

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 140–158 | Cite as

Cine-psychometry

  • Warren F. Seibert
  • Richard E. Snow
Articles
  • 26 Downloads

Keywords

Motion Picture Factor Analytic Study Ability Factor Film Test Item Exposure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Averbach, E., and Coriell, A. S.“Short-Term Memory in Vision.”Bell System Technical Journal 40:309–28; 1961.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beck, L. F.The Measurement of Visual Apprehension. Eugene: University of Oregon, 1935. (16mm film.)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boas, K.“Intelligensprüfen mittels des Kinematographen.”Zeitschrift für Psychotherapie und Medizinische Psychologie 1:364; 1909.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boring, E. G.“Capacity to Report upon Moving Pictures as Conditioned by Sex and Age.”Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 6:820–34; 1916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Broadbent, D. E.Perception and Communication. New York: Pergamon, 1958.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bryan, G. L, and Rigney, J. W.“A Study of Relationships Between True and Relative Motion as Perceptual Tasks in Two Display Contexts.”Electronics Personnel Research Technical Report No. 20. Los Angeles: University of Southern California Department of Psychology, 1957.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Carmichael, L.; Roberts, S. O.; and Wessell, N. Y.“A Study of the Judgment of Manual Expression as Presented in Still and Motion Pictures.”Journal of Social Psychology 8:115–42; 1937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carpenter, C. R.; Greenhill, L. P.; Hittinger, W. F.; McCoy, E. P.; McIntyre, C. J.; Murnin, J. A.; and Watkins, R. W.“The Development of a Sound Motion Picture Proficiency Test.”Personnel Psychology 7:509–23; 1954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cline, V. B.“Ability to Judge Personality Assessed with a Stress Interview and a Sound-Film Technique.”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 50:183–87; 1955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Conrad, H. S.Psychological Studies of Motion Pictures. Berkeley: University of California Press, Publications in Psychology, 1929.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cronbach, L. J.“The Two Disciplines of Scientific Psychology.”American Psychologist 12:671–84; 1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Curtis, H. A., and Kropp, R. P.“Experimental Analyses of the Effects of Various Modes of Item Presentation on the Scores and Factorial Content of Tests Administered by Visual and Audio-Visual Means.”Tallahassee: Florida State University, c. 1961. (USOE Grant No. 7-08-075 Final Report.)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fleishman, E. A.“The Description and Prediction of Perceptual-Motor Skill Learning.”Training Research and Education (edited by R. Glaser). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1962. PP-137–75.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ford, A.Rote Learning. Chicago: C. H. Stoelting Co., 1931. (16mm film.) (SeePsychological Abstracts 11:4052; 1937.)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    —.Tachistoscopic Perception. Chicago: C. H. Stoelting Co., 1933. (16mm film.) (SeePsychological Abstracts 9:3561; 1935.)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Frachter, B., and Mahan, W. W.“Some Perceptual Factors Measured by Motion Picture Tests.”Journal of Educational Psychology 43:43O-35; 1952.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gibson, J. J., editor.Army Air Forces Aviation Psychology Program, Report No. 7: Motion Picture Testing and Research. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1947.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Guba, E.; Wolf, Willavene; de Groot, Sybil; Knemeyer, M.; Van Atta, R.; and Light, L.“Eye Movements and TV Viewing in Children.”AV Communication Review 12:386–401; Winter 1964.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Guilford, J. P.Psychometric Methods. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1954.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    —.Personality. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1959.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    —.“Three Faces of Intellect.”American Psychologist 14: 469–79; 1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    —.“Factorial Angles to Psychology.”Psychological Review 68:1–20; 1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Heckman, R. W.“Effects of Controlling Item Exposure in Achievement Testing.”Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Purdue University, 1965.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Heider, F., and Simmel, Marianne.“An Experimental Study of Apparent Behavior.”American Journal of Psychology 57:243–59; 1944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Johnson, D. M., and Vogtmann, W. G.“A Motion Picture Test of Achievement in Psychology.”American Psychologist 10:69–71; 1955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lhotsky, J.“Der ‘Vierdimensionale” Test (Eine Neue Film-Test Methode).”La Psychotechnique dans le Monde Moderne (edited by F. Baumgarten). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1952. pp. 572–73. (SeePsychological Abstracts 27:2739(a); 1953.)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    —.“Filmtest und Test-Filme.”Die Vorträge der 4. Lindauer Psychotherapiewoche 1953 (edited by E. Speer). Stuttgart: Georg Thieme, 1954. pp. 113–17. (SeePsychological Abstracts 29:7293; 1955.)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    McIntyre, C. J.“Sex, Age, and Iconicity as Factors in Projective Film Tests.”Journal of Consulting Psychology 18:337–43; 1954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    —.“Evaluation of Motion Pictures to Simulate Reality in the Thematic Apperception Test.”Technical Report SDC 269-7-47. Port Washington, L.I., N.Y.: U.S. Navy Special Devices Center, 1955.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Metfessel, M., and Warren, N.Reliability of Memory. Chicago: C. H. Stoelting Co., 1932. (16mm film.) (SeePsychological Abstracts 9:4960; 1935.)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    —.Rate of Visual Perception. Chicago: C. H. Stoelting Co., 1932. (16mm film.) (SeePsychological Abstracts 9:4938; 1935.)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pillsbury, W. B.“The Cinematoscope as a Memory Apparatus.”American journal of Psychology 41:123; 1929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ray, W. S.“An Instructional Film for Use in the Fidelity of Report Experiment.”journal of Psychology 24:293–96; 1947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Roff, M.“A Factorial Study of Tests in the Perceptual Area.”PsychometricMonographs, No. 8; 1952.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Schmidt, B.“Reflektorische Reaktionen auf Form und Farbe und Ihre Typologische Bedeutung.”Zeitschrift Psychologie 137:245–310; 1936.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Schur, A.“The Motion Picture as a Testing Device.”The Clearing House 9:504; 1935.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Seibert, W. F., and Snow, R. E.“Studies in Cine-Psychometry: Factor Analysis of Audio-Visual Memory.”Purdue University Audio Visual Center, 1964. (Mimeo proposal to USOE, Title VII NDEA Grant No. 7-24-0280-257.)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Seibert, W. F.; Senn, J. L., Jr.; and Snow, R. E.“Studies in Cine-Psychometry I: Factor Analysis of Visual Cognition and Memory.”Lafayette, Ind.: Purdue University Audio Visual Center, 1965. (USOE Grant No. 7-12-0280-184. Final Report-in preparation.)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Shor, R. E.“Effects of Preinformation upon Human Characteristics Attributed to Animated Geometric Figures.”journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 54:124–26; 1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Stoller, R. J., and Geertsma, R. H.“Construction of a Final Examination to Assess Clinical Judgment in Psychiatry.”Journal of Medical Education 33:837–40; 1958.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Suppes, P.“Modern Learning Theory and the Elementary-School Curriculum.”American Education Research Journal 1:79–93; 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Thurstone, L. L.“A Micro-Film Projector Method for Psychological Tests.”Psychometrika 6:235–48; 1941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    -. “A Factorial Study of Perception.”PsychometricMonographs, No. 4; 1944.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    —.“Psychological Implications of Factor Analysis.”American Psychologist 3:402–408; 1948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    —.“The Development of Objective Measures of Temperament.”Psychometric Laboratory Report No. 1. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, 1953.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Travers, R. M. W.“The Transmission of Information to Human Receivers.”AV Communication Review 12:373–85; Winter1964.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Utley, J.“Factors Involved in the Teaching and Testing of Lip Reading through the Use of Motion Pictures.”Volta Review 48: 657–59; 1946.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Van Horn, C.“An Investigation of the Applicability of Motion Pictures to Educational Testing.”University of Illinois College of Education, 1960. (Mimeo proposal to USOE, Title VII NDEA Project No. 665.)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Vogel, W., and Broverman, D. M.“Relationship Between EEG and Test Intelligence.”Psychological Bulletin 62:132–44; 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Whipple, G. M.Manual of Mental and Physical Tests. Part II: Complex Processes. Baltimore: Warwick and York, 1921.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 1965

Authors and Affiliations

  • Warren F. Seibert
    • 1
  • Richard E. Snow
    • 1
  1. 1.Instructional Media Research Unit, Audio Visual CenterPurdue UniversityLafayetteIndiana

Personalised recommendations