Mathematical Geology

, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp 335–348

A variance-ratio test for supporting a variable mean in kriging

Article

Abstract

This article discusses the issue of whether to use a variable mean and describes a test that can be used to evaluate whether it is justified to add terms to the drift (deterministic part) of a geostatistical model. The basic model could be the intrinsic one, where the deterministic part is a constant, and the alternate model could be any model that includes a constant term in the expression for the drift. Also, differences between constant- and variable-mean models are discussed.

Key words

geostatistics linear model best linear unbiased estimation experimental variogram restricted maximum likelihood model testing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Armstrong, M., 1984, Problems with universal kriging: Math. Geology, v. 16, no. 1, p. 101–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Christensen, R., 1990, The equivalence of predictions from universal kriging and intrinsic random function kriging: Math. Geology, v. 22, no. 6, p. 655–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Draper, N., and Smith, H., 1981, Applied regression analysis: Wiley Interscience, New York, 709 p.Google Scholar
  4. Journel, A., and Rossi, M., 1989, When do we need a trend model in Kriging?: Math. Geology, v 21, no. 7, p. 715–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kitanidis, P. K., 1987, Parametric estimation of covariances of regionalized variables: Water Resources Res. Bull., v. 23, no. 4, p. 557–567.Google Scholar
  6. Kitanidis, P. K., 1991, Orthonormal residuals in geostatistics: Model criticism and parameter estimation: Math. Geology, v. 23, no. 5, p. 741–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kitanidis, P. K., 1993, Generalized convariance functions in estimation: Math. Geology, v. 25, no. 5. p. 525–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Matheron, G., 1971, The theory of regionalized variables and its applications: Cahiers du Centre de Morphologie Mathematique, No. 5, Ecole des Mines, Fontainbleau, France, 212 p.Google Scholar
  9. Searle, S. R., Casella, G., and McCulloch, C. E., 1992, Variance components: Wiley Interscience, New York, 501 p.Google Scholar
  10. Starks, T. H., and Fang, J. H., 1982, The effect of drift on the experimental semivariogram: Math. Geology, v. 14, no. 4, p. 309–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Volpi, G., and G. Gambolati, 1978, On the use of a main trend for the kriging technique in hydrology: Advances in Water Resources, v. 1, no. 6, p. 345–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association for Mathematical Geology 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringStanford UniversityStanford

Personalised recommendations