Journal of Ethology

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 39–43 | Cite as

Influence of brood size and offspring size on parental investment in a biparental cichlid fish,Neolamprologus moorii

  • Kenji Karino


Both males and females ofNeolamprologus moorii, a substrate-spawning cichlid fish in Lake Tanganyika, tend their eggs and fry. In this study, the influence of brood size and fry size on parental investment of this species was examined under natural conditions. Breeding parents intensively attacked fry-eating fishes that approached their broods. The attack rate by the parents against the approaching fry-eaters was positively correlated with brood size and negatively with fry size, but was much more strongly related to brood size. This suggests that the parental decision for brood defense appeared to be primarily determined by brood size. The reason for fry size being less important in the parental decision may be that even large fry have a low survival ability on their own under the high predation pressure in the study sites.


Attack Rate Brood Size Parental Investment Cichlid Fish Parental Decision 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Brichard, P. 1989 Cichlids and all the other fishes of Lake Tanganyika. 544 pp. T. F. H. Publications, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  2. Coleman, R.M., M.R. Gross & R.C. Sargent 1985 Parental investment decision rules: a test in bluegill sunfish.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 18: 59–66.Google Scholar
  3. Colgan, P.W. & M.R. Gross 1977 Dynamics of aggression in male pumpkinseed sunfish (Lepomis gibbosus) over the reproductive phase.Z. Tierpsychol. 43: 139–151.Google Scholar
  4. Hori, M. 1987 Mutualism and commensalism in a fish community in Lake Tanganyika. In: S. Kawano, J.H. Connell, and T. Hidaka (eds.)Evolution and coadaptation in biotic communities, pp. 219–239. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  5. Keenleyside, M.H.A. 1983 Mate desertion in relation to adult sex ratio in the biparental cichlid fishHerotilapia multispinosa.Anim. Behav. 31: 683–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kohda, M. & Y. Takemon 1996 Group foraging by the herbivorous cichlid fish,Petrochromis fasciolatus, in Lake Tanganyika.Ichthyol. Res. 43: 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kuwamura, T. 1992 Overlapping territories ofPseudosimochromis curvifrons males and other herbivorous cichlid fishes in Lake Tanganyika.Ecol. Res. 7: 43–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kynard, B.E. 1978 Breeding behavior of a lacustrine population of threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus).Behaviour 67: 178–207.Google Scholar
  9. Lavery, R.J. & P.W. Colgan 1991 Brood age and parental defence in the convict cichlid,Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum (Pisces: Cichlidae).Anim. Behav. 41: 945–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lavery, R.J. & M.H.A. Keenleyside 1990 Parental investment of a biparental cichlid fish,Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum, in relation to brood size and past investment.Anim. Behav. 40: 1128–1137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lavery, R.J. & S.G. Reebs 1994 Effect of mate removal on current and subsequent parental care in the convict cichlid (Pisces: Cichlidae).Ethology 97: 265–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sargent, R.C. 1981 Sexual selection and reproductive effort in the threespine stickleback,Gasterosteus aculeatus. 85 pp. Ph. D. Thesis, State University of New York.Google Scholar
  13. Sargent, R.C. 1988 Parental care and egg survival both increase with clutch size in the fathead minnow,Pimephales promelas.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 23: 33–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sargent, R.C. & M.R. Gross 1993 Williams’ principle: an explanation of parental care in teleost fishes. In: T.J. Pitcher (ed.)Behaviour of teleost fishes (2nd ed.), pp. 333–361. Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar
  15. Trivers, R.L. 1972 Parental investment and sexual selection. In: B. Campbell (ed.)Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871–1971, pp. 136–179. Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Ethological Society 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenji Karino
    • 1
  1. 1.Sesoko Station, Tropical Biosphere Research CenterUniversity of the RyukyusOkinawaJapan

Personalised recommendations