Lasers in Medical Science

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 307–312 | Cite as

Dosedependent photodynamic effects of 9-acetoxy-2,7,12,17-tetrakis(\-methoxyethyl)-porphycene in vitro

  • S. Karrer
  • R. M. Szeimies
  • A. Ebert
  • S. Fickweiler
  • C. Abels
  • W. BÄumler
  • M. Landthaler
Original Articles

Abstract

Porphycenes are chemically pure photosensitizers for topical and systemic photodynamic therapy (PDT). Fast cellular uptake of 9-acetoxy-2,7,12,17-tetrakis-(sB-methoxyethyl)porphycene (ATMPn) has been shown previously.

HaCaT human keratinocytes were incubated with ATMPn (1 nmol l-1 to 1 µmol l-1 in DMSO or DOPC liposomes). After 1 h, cells were irradiated with different light doses (0, 24, 48J cm-2) using an incoherent light source (580—740 nm, 40 mW cm-2). Cytotoxic effects were determined by assessing the mitochondrial activity using the MTT assay 24 h following irradiation.

Cytotoxic effects were dependent on ATMPn concentration and light dose. Using 20 nmol 1-1, a 50% decrease of mitochondrial activity (EC50) after irradiation with 24 J cm-2 was achieved. Lowering the ATMPn concentration (10nmol 1-1) and increasing the light dose (48 J cm-2) yielded the same effect (EC50). Maximal decrease of mitochondrial activity (90%) was achieved using ATMPn concentrations of 50–100 nmol l-1 and a light dose of 24 J cm-2 or 25 nmol l-1 ATMPn and 48 Jcm-2.

There was no difference regarding the dose-dependent cytotoxic effects using either ATMPn in DMSO or DOPC liposomes. In the control group (incubation with 1 nmol 1-1 to 1µmol 1-1 ATMPn, no irradiation), dark toxicity was not observed.

Cell photosensitization with ATMPn was very efficient in vitro yielding the maximal cytotoxic effect at very low ATMPn concentrations as compared to other photosensitizers. Since ATMPn in DMSO and DOPC liposomes revealed the same cytotoxic effects without dark toxicity, theDMSO formulation, which is much easier to prepare, will be preferred in future studies.

Key words

Photodynamic therapy Porphycenes Cell culture study Keratinocytes 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Pass HI. Photodynamic therapy in oncology: mechanism and clinical use.J Natl Cancer Inst 1993,85:443–56CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lui H, Anderson RR. Photodynamic therapy in dermatology.Arch Dermatol 1992,128:1631–6CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wooten RS, Smith KC, Ahlquist DA, Muller SA, Balm RK. Prospective study of cutaneous phototoxicity after systemic hematoporphyrin derivative.Lasers Surg Med 1988,8:294–300CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gomer CJ, Rucker N, Ferrario A, Wong S. Properties and applications of photodynamic therapy.Radiat Res 1989,120:1–18CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aramendia PF, Redmond RW, Nonell S, Schuster W, Braslavsky SE, Schaffner K, Vogel E. The photophysical properties of porphycenes: potential photodynamic therapy agents.Photochem Photobiol 1986,44:555–9CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vogel E, K:ocher M, Schmickler H, Lex J. Porphycene—a novel porphin isomer.Angew Chem 1986,98:262–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kimel S, Gottfried V, David R, Averbuj C. In vivo uptake and photodynamic activity of porphycenes.Proc Photodynamic Therapy of Cancer, SPIE 1994, 2078:205–10Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Richert C, Wessels JM, Müller M, Kisters M, Benninghaus M, Goetz AE. Photodynamic antitumor agents: \-methoxyethyl groups give access to functionalized porphycenes and enhance cellular uptake and activity.J Med Chem 1994,37:2792–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dellian M, Richert C, Gamarra F, Goetz AE. Photodynamic eradication of amelanotic melanoma of the hamster with fast acting photosensitizers.Int J Cancer 1996,65:246–8CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Szeimies RM, Karrer S, Abels C, Steinbach P, Fickweiler S, Messmann H, BÄumler W, Landthaler M. 9-Acetoxy-2,7,12,17-tetrakis(\-methoxyethyl)porphycene (ATMPn), a novel photosensitizer for photodynamic therapy: uptake kinetics and intracellular localization.J Photochem Photobiol B: Biol 1996,34:67–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Abels C, Dellian M, Szeimies RM, Steinbach P, Richert C, Goetz AE. Targeting of the tumor microcirculation by photodynamic therapy with a synthetic prophycene.J Photochem Photobiol B: Biol (in press)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Karrer S, Abels C, Szeimies RM, BÄumler W, Dellian M, Hohenleutner U, Goetz AE, Landthaler M. Topical application of a first porphycene dye for photodynamic therapy—penetration studies in human perilesional skin and basal cell carcinoma.Arch Dermatol Res 1997,289:132–7CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Boukamp P, Petrussevska RT, Breitkrutz D, Hornung J, Markham A, Fusenig NE. Normal keratinization in a spontaneously immortalized aneuploid human keratinocyte cell line.J Cell Biol 1988,106:761–71CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Richert C. A long-time-stable liposome formulation for porphyrinoid photosensitizers.J Photochem Photobiol B Biol 1993,19:67–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Szeimies RM, Hein R, BÄumler W, Heine A, Landthaler M. A possible new incoherent lamp for photodynamic treatment of superficial skin lesions.Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1994,74:117–9Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Niks M, Otto M. Towards an optimized MTT assay.J Immunol Methods 1990,130:149–51CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    McHale AP, McHale L. Use of a tetrazolium based colorimetric assay in assessing photoradiation therapy in vitro.Cancer Lett 1988,41:315–21CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Szeimies RM, Abels C, Fritsch C, Karrer S, Steinbach P, BÄumler W, Goerz G, Goetz AE, Landthaler M. Wavelength dependency of photodynamic effects after sensitization with 5-aminolevulinic acid in vitro and in vivo.J Invest Dermatol 1995,105:672–7CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Iinuma S, Farshi SS, Ortel B, Hasan T. A mechanistic study of cellular photodestruction with 5-aminolevulinic acid-induced porphyrin.Br J Cancer 1994, 70:21—8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Matthews W, Cook J, Mitchell JB, Perry RR, Evans S, Pass HI. In vitro photodynamic therapy of human lung cancer: Investigation of dose-rate effects.Cancer Res 1989,49:1718–21PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sporn LA, Foster TH. Photofrin and light induces microtubule depolymerization in cultured human endothelial cells.Cancer Res 1992,52:3443–8PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© W.B. Saunders Company Ltd 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Karrer
    • 1
  • R. M. Szeimies
    • 1
  • A. Ebert
    • 1
  • S. Fickweiler
    • 2
  • C. Abels
    • 1
  • W. BÄumler
    • 1
  • M. Landthaler
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of DermatologyUniversity of RegensburgRegensburgGermany
  2. 2.Institute of PathologyUniversity of RegensburgRegensburgGermany

Personalised recommendations