, Volume 46, Issue 1, pp 51–72 | Cite as

Scientometric analysis of nature, the journal

  • D. B. Arkhipov


300,000 reports inNature during the 1869–1998 period have been reviewed. The distribution of articles by subfields was determined. Additional sources of information were several journals on analytical chemistry and papers at the Pittsburg conference series during 1950–1999. The methodology used is based on the analysis of the average age of employed instruments. The agreement between scientometric data from various sources of information depends on the development stage of the field of science. Calculated and measured scientometric curves were compared. One of the key trends in the development of basic sciences, namely, the increase of articles dealing with instrumental analytical chemistry, inNature is revealed.


Scan Tunneling Microscope Average Annual Number Nature Nature SCIENTOMETRIC Analysis British Science 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    V. G. Berezkin, E. N. Viktorova, Development of capillary gas chromatography (Scientometric analysis),J. Anal. Chem., 43 (1988) 2099–2102.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. B. Arkhipov, B. G. Belenkii, Development of liquid chromatography instrumentation. Trends in 1958–1991,J. Anal. Chem., 48 (1993) 1894–1905.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. B. Arkhipov, B. G. Belenkii, Trends in the development of liquid chromatography instrumentation based on citations in two scientific journals,LC-GC Inter., 6 (1993) 370–376.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. B. Arkhipov, B. G. Belenkii, Analysis of trends in the development of instrumental separation techniques: 1952–1993,J. Anal. Chem., 50 (1995) 806–817.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    I. Prigogine,From Being to Becoming: Time and Complexity in the Physical Sciences, W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, 1980, p. 235.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. Bruckner, W. Ebeling, A. Sharnhorst, Application of evolution models in scientometrics,Scientometrics, 18 (1990) 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. Braun, E. Bujdosó, A. Schubert,Literature of Analytical Chemistry: A Scientometric Evalution, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1987, p. 8.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. K. Romanov, A. I. Terekhov, The mathematical modelling of the scientific personnel movement taking into account the productivity factor,Scientometrics, 33 (1995) 221–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    L. M. Liang, H. Z. Zhao, Y. Wang, Y. S. Wu, Distribution of major scientific and technological achievements in terms of age group — Weibull distribution,Scientometrics, 36 (1996) 2–18.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. K. Romanov, A. I. Terekhov, The mathematical model of productivity and age-structured scientific community evolution,Scientometrics, 39 (1997) 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. L. Rivas, D. Deshler, R. D. Colle, R. N. Gonzalez, F. W. Quimby, Indicators of disciplinary differentiation: Interdisciplinary linkages and adoption rate of biological innovations,Scientometrics, 37 (1996) 63–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    V. S. Lazarev, On chaos in bibliometric terminology,Scientometrics, 35 (1996) 271–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. S. Katz, D. M. Hicks, A Systemic view on British science,Scientometrics, 35 (1996) 133–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    T. Braun, M. Brocken, W. Glänzel, E. Rinia, A. Schubert, “Hyphenation” of databases in building scientometric indicators,Scientometrics, 33 (1995) 131–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    T. Braun, W. Glänzel, H. Grupp, The scientometric weight of 50 nations in 27 science areas, 1989–1993,Scientometrics, 33 (1995) 263–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    T. Braun, A. Schubert, S. Zsindely, Nanoscience and nanotechnology on the balance,Scientometrics, 38 (1997) 321–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    H. Dai, J. H. Hafner, A. G. Rinzler, D. T. Colbert, R. E. Smalley, Nanotubes as nanoprobes in scanning probe microscope,Nature, 384 (1996) 147–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    J. Six, M. C. Bustamante, Bibliometric analysis of publications in experimental particle physics on cosmic rays and with accelerators,Scientometrics, 37 (1996) 25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    F. Kunst et al., The complete genome sequence of the Gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis,Nature, 390 (1997) 249–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. B. Arkhipov
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Analytical Instrumentation of the Russian Academy of SciencesSt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations