Skip to main content
Log in

Predatory behavior in the genusLeptogenys: A comparative study

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We studied the predatory behavior of seven species of the genusLeptogenys from Mexico and Cameroon. The ants of this genus are armed with long, thin, curved mandibles articulated at the extreme corners of the anterior margin of the head, permitting them easily to seize oniscoid isopods, the obligate or the principal prey of mostLeptogenys species. Workers hunt these prey, which are able to roll themselves up, solitarily. Foraging behavior comprises sequences of up to eight activities. The prey can be seized by the body (rolled up or not), or alternatively by the edge of the shell, then turned over and stung on the ventral face. A relationship between the mandible size of the workers and the handling method permitted us to established that the phase “seizure by the edge of the shell” (compared to grasping the prey by the body) was more frequent as the prey size increased or the mandible length of the workers decreased. The rate of prey escape followed the same pattern. When a prey escaped, workers reacted by using a local searching or “reserve” behavior: they moved by increasing both sinuosity and speed. Recruitment occurred mainly after a worker found a group of prey or a large prey.L. mexicana are attractive at a distance to the isopods Bathytropidae living in the same natural environment. As a consequence, prey capture is possible without foraging for this species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amold, G. (1915). A monograph of the Formicidae of South Africa.Ann. South Afr. Mus. 14: 1–766.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, B. (1973). The ant genera of West Africa: A synonimic synopsis with keys (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).Bull. Br. Mus. (Nat. Hist.) 27: 317–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, B. (1975). A revision of the ant genusLeptogenys Roger (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in the Ethiopian region. With a review of the Malagasy species.Bull. Br. Mus. (Nat. Hist.) 31: 237–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • China, W. E. (1928). A remarkable bug which lures ants to their destruction.Nat. Hist. Mag. 1: 209–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dejean, A. (1985a). Etude éco-éthologique de la prédation chez les fourmis du genreSmithistruma (Formicidae, Myrmicinae, tribu des Dacetini). II. Attraction des proies principales.Insectes Soc. 32: 158–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dejean, A. (1985b). Etude éco-éthologique de la prédation chez les fourmis du genreSmithistruma (Formicidae, Myrmicinae, tribu des Dacetini). III. La capture des proies chezS. emarginata.Insectes Soc. 32: 244–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dejean, A. (1988a). Failure as an efficient stimulus of a “reserve behaviour” which allows the capture of alternative prey bySerrastruma serrula workers (Formicidae, Myrmicinae).Sociobiology 14: 325–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dejean, A. (1988b). Determination of the hunting strategy in the genusSmithistruma (Formicidae, Myrmicinae) by the kind of prey.Behav. Proc. 16: 111–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dejean, A. (1997). Distribution of colonies and prey specialization in the ponerine ant genusLeptogenys. Sociobiology 29 (in press).

  • Duncan, F. D. (1992). Foraging strategies ofLeptogenys nitida (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). In Billen, J. (ed.),Biology and Evolution of Social Insects, Leuven University Press, Leuven, pp. 319–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, F. D., and Crewe, R. M. (1994). Group hunting in a ponerine ant,Leptogenys nitida Smith.Oecologia 97: 118–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, D. J. C. (1971). The glandular source and social functions of trail pheromones in two species of ants (Leptogenys).J. Entomol. 46: 27–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, D. J. C. (1973). “Army ant” behaviour in the Ponerinae: A re-assessment.Proc. VIIth Conf. IUSSI, London, pp. 116–121.

  • Freitas, A. V. L. (1995). Nest relocation and prey specialization in the antLeptogenys propelfalciferas Roger (Formicidae: Ponerinae) in an urban area in southern Brazil.Insectes Soc. 42: 453–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garnett, W. B., Akre, R. D., and Sehlke, G. (1985). Cocoon mimicry and predation by myrmecophilous diptera (Diptera: Syrphidae).Fla. Entomol. 68: 615–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorvett, H. (1956). Tegumental glands and terrestrial life in woodlice.Proc. Zool. Soc. London 126: 291–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler, B., and Wilson, E. O. (1990).The Ants, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. W., Akre, R. D., and Garnett, W. B. (1990a). Chemical mimicry in an obligate predator of carpenter ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 83: 607–616.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. W., Standley-Samuelson, D. W., and Akre, R. D. (1990b). Biosynthesis and chemical mimicry of cuticular hydrocarbons from the obligate predator,Microdon albicomatus Novak (Diptera: Syrphidae) and its ant prey,Myrmica incompleta Provancher (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 63: 437–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, I. (1979). Prey attraction and immobilization by allomone from nymphs ofWomeria strandtmanni (Acarina: Trombiculidae).Acarologia 20: 112–115.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, E. (1911). Biological notes on the HemipteronPtilocerus ochraceus.Tids. voor Entomol. 54: 175–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, A. R. V. (1990). Batch strench of hunting groups inLeptogenys diminuta (Formicidae: Ponerinae). In Veeresh, G. K., Mallik, B., and Viraktamath, C. A. (eds.),Social Insects and the Environment, E. J. Brill, Leiden, pp. 562–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévieux, J. (1977). La nutrition des fourmis tropicales. V. Eléments de synthèse: Les modes d’exploitation de la biocénose.Insectes Soc. 24: 235–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lévieux, J. (1983). The soil fauna of tropical savannas. IV. The ants. In Bourlière, B. (ed.),Tropical Savannas, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 525–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longhurst, C., Baker, R., and Howse, P. E. (1978). Chemical crypsis in predatory ants.Experientia 35: 870–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maschwitz, U., and Mühlemberg, M. (1975). Zür Jaardstrategie einger orientaliischerLeptogenys-Arten (Formicidae: Ponerinae).Oecologia 20: 65–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maschwitz, U., and Schönegge, P. (1977). Recruitment gland ofLeptogenys chinensis. A new type of pheromone gland in ants.Naturwissenschaften 64: 589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maschwitz, U., and Schönegge, P. (1983). Forage communication, nest moving recruitment, and prey specialization in the oriental ponerineLeptogenys chinensis.Oecologia 57: 175–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maschwitz, U., Steghaus-Kovac, S., Gaube, R., and Hänel, H. (1989). A south Asian ponerine ant of the genusLeptogenys (Hym., Form.) with army ant life habits.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 24: 305–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mill, A. E. (1982). Faunal studies on termites (Isoptera) and observations on their ant predators (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in the Amazon basin.Rev. Bras. Entomol. 26: 253–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peeters, C. P. (1997). Morphology of “primitive” ants: Comparative revue of social characters, and the importance of queen dimorphism. In Choe, J., and Crespi, B. (eds.),The Evolution of Social Behavior in Insects and Arachnids, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 372–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalfuss, H. (1984). Eco-morphological strategies in terrestrial isopods.Symp. Zool. Soc. London 53: 49–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steghaus-Kovac, S., and Maschwitz, U. (1993). Predation on earwigs: A novel diet specialization within the genusLeptogenys (Formicidae: Ponerinae).Insectes Soc. 40: 337–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, S. L. (1980).Woodlice, Pergamon Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trager, J. C., and Johnson, C. (1988). The ant genusLeptogenys (Hymenoptera: Formicidae, Ponerinae) in the United States. In Trager, J. C. (ed.),Advances in Myrmecology, E. J. Brill, New York, pp. 29–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vander Meer, R. K., and Wojcik, D. P. (1982). Chemical mimicry in the myrmecophilous beetleMyrmecaphodius excavaticolis.Science 218: 806–808.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, W. M. (1904). A crustacean-eating ant (Leptogenys elongata Buckley).Biol. Bull. Marine Biol. Lab. Woods Hole 6: 251–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, W. M. (1910).Ants: Their Structure, Development and Behavior, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, W. M. (1922). Ants of the Belgian Congo. Part 2. Ants collected by the American Museum Congo Expedition.Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 45: 39–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, W. M. (1936). Ecological relations of ponerine and other ants to termites.Proc. Am. Acad. Arts Sci. 71: 159–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1958a). Studies on the ant fauna of Melanesia. I. The tribeLeptogenyini. II. The tribesAmblyoponini andPlatythyreini.Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harvard 118: 101–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1958b). The beginnings of nomadic and group-predatory behavior in the ponerine ants.Evolution 12: 24–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1959). Some ecological characteristics of ants in New Guinea rain forests.Ecology 40: 437–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dejean, A., Evraerts, C. Predatory behavior in the genusLeptogenys: A comparative study. J Insect Behav 10, 177–191 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765551

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765551

Key Words

Navigation