ECTJ

, Volume 30, Issue 4, pp 195–232

Effects of text illustrations: A review of research

  • W. Howard Levie
  • Richard Lentz
Articles

Abstract

Can illustrations aid learning of text material? These authors review the results of 55 experiments comparing learning from illustrated text with learning from text alone. They go on to look at research in closely related fields (involving, for example, nonrepresentational pictures, graphic organizers, learner-produced drawings) and conclude by offering guidelines for practice.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alesandrini, K. L. Pictorial-verbal and analyticholistic learning strategies in science learning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1981,73, 358–368.Google Scholar
  2. Alvermann, D. E.The compensatory effect of graphic organizer instruction on text structure. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Los Angeles, April 1981.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, R. C., & Kulhavy, R. W. Imagery and prose learning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1972,63, 242–243.Google Scholar
  4. Arlin, M., Scott, M., & Webster, J. The effects of pictures on rate of learning sight words: A critique of the focal attention hypothesis.Reading Research Quarterly, 1978-1979,14, 645–657.Google Scholar
  5. Arnold, D. J., & Brooks, P. H. Influence of contextual organizing material on children’s listening comprehension.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1976,68, 711–716.Google Scholar
  6. Arnold, T. C., & Dwyer, F. M. Realism in visualized instruction.Perception and Motor Skills, 1975,40, 369–370.Google Scholar
  7. Bahrick, H. P., & Gharrity, K. Interaction among pictorial components in the recall of picture captions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1976,2, 103–111.Google Scholar
  8. Baker, E. L., & Popham, W. J. Value of pictorial embellishments in a tape-slide instructional program.AV Communication Review, 1965,13, 397–404.Google Scholar
  9. Barron, R. F.A systematic research procedure, organizers, and overviews: A historical perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, San Diego, December 1980.Google Scholar
  10. Bartram, D. J. Comprehending spatial information: The relative efficiency of different methods of presenting information about bus routes.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1980,65, 103–110.Google Scholar
  11. Baxter, W. S., Quarles, R., & Kodak, H.The effects of photographs and their size on reading and recall of news stories. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Association for Education in Journalism, Seattle, August 1978. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 159 722)Google Scholar
  12. Bernard, R. M., Petersen, C. H., & Ally, M. Can images provide contextual support for prose?Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 1981,29, 101–108.Google Scholar
  13. Bevan, W., and Feuer, J. N. The facilitative role of imagery in episodic memory: Multiple cues or active construction?Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1977,10, 172–174.Google Scholar
  14. Bluth, L. F.A comparison of the reading comprehension of good and poor readers in the second grade with and without illustration. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1972. (University Microfilms No. 73-17, 122)Google Scholar
  15. Bock, M. Levels of processing of normal and ambiguous sentences in different contexts.Psychological Research, 1978,40, 37–51.Google Scholar
  16. Bock, M., & Milz, B. Pictorial context and the recall of pronoun sentences.Psychological Research, 1977,39, 203–220.Google Scholar
  17. Booher, H. R. Relative comprehensibility of pictorial information and printed words in proceduralized instructions.Human Factors, 1975,17, 266–277.Google Scholar
  18. Bransford, J. D.Human cognition. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth Publishing, 1979.Google Scholar
  19. Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1972,11, 717–726.Google Scholar
  20. Braun, C. Interest-loading and modality effects on textual response acquisition.Reading Research Quarterly, 1969,4, 428–444.Google Scholar
  21. Brody, P. J. Research on pictures in instructional texts: The need for a broadened perspective.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 1981,29, 93–100.Google Scholar
  22. Brody, P. J., & Legenza, A. Can pictorial attributes serve mathemagenic functions?Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 1980,28, 25–29.Google Scholar
  23. Brooks, P. R.The influence of pictures, context and difficulty on beginning reading. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Florida, 1977.Google Scholar
  24. Bryant, J., Brown, D., Silberberg, A., & Elliot, S. M.Humorous illustrations in textbooks: Effects on information acquisition, appeal, persuasibility and motivation. Paper presented at the Speech Communication Association Convention, New York, November 1980. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 196 071)Google Scholar
  25. Bull, B. L., & Wittrock, M. C. Imagery in the learning of verbal definitions.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1973,43, 289–293.Google Scholar
  26. Byram, M., & Garforth, C. Research and testing non-formal education materials: A multimedia extension program in Botswana.Educational Television International, December 1980, 190–194.Google Scholar
  27. Carr, T. H., Bacharach, V. R., & Mehner, D. S. Preparing children to look at pictures: Advance descriptions direct attention and facilitate active processing.Child Development, 1977,48, 22–29.Google Scholar
  28. Clark, F. E., & Angert, J. F.Ameta-analytic study of pictorial stimulus complexity. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Denver, April 1980. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 196 405)Google Scholar
  29. Clark, H. H., & Carlson, T. B. Context for comprehension. In J. Long & A. Braddeley (Eds.),Attention and performance IX. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1981.Google Scholar
  30. Cole, J. N. The effects of non-prose textual characteristics on retention of major concepts and supporting details with and without specific instruction in their use. In P. D. Peterson (Ed.),Reading: Theory, research, and practice (26th Yearbook of the National Reading Conference). Clemson, S.C.: National Reading Conference, Inc., 1977.Google Scholar
  31. Concannon, S. J. Illustrations in books for children: Review of research.Reading Teacher, 1975,29, 254–256.Google Scholar
  32. Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1972,26, 274–284.Google Scholar
  33. Dana, C. M.The effects of using a graphic advance organizer before, during, and after reading on the comprehension of written text: A study conducted with sixth-grade students. Madison: University of Wisconsin Research and Development Center for Individualized Schooling, 1980. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 193 606)Google Scholar
  34. Dean, R. S., & Kulhavy, R. W. Influence of spatial organization in prose learning,foumal of Educational Psychology, 1981,76, 57–61.Google Scholar
  35. de Melo, H. T.Visual self-paced instruction and visual testing in biological science at the secondary level. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, 1980.Google Scholar
  36. Denberg, S. D. The interaction of picture and print in reading instruction (abstracted report).Reading Research Quarterly, 1976-1977,12, 176–189.Google Scholar
  37. DeRose, T.The effects of verbally and pictorially induced and imposed strategies on children’s memory for text. Madison: University of Wisconsin Research and Development Center for Cognitive Learning, 1976. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 133 709)Google Scholar
  38. Duchastel, P., & Waller, R. Pictorial illustration in instructional texts.Educational Technology, November 1979,19, 20–25.Google Scholar
  39. Dunham, T. C., & Levin, J. R. Imagery instructions and young children’s prose learning: No evidence of “support.”Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1979,4, 107–113.Google Scholar
  40. Dwyer, F. M. The relative effectiveness of varied visual illustrations in complementing programmed instruction.The Journal of Experimental Education, 1967,36, 34–42.Google Scholar
  41. Dwyer, F. M. The effectiveness of visual illustrations used to complement programmed instruction.Journal of Psychology, 1968,70, 157–162.Google Scholar
  42. Dwyer, F. M. The effect of varying the amount of realistic detail in visual illustrations designed to complement programmed instruction.Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 1969,6, 147–153.Google Scholar
  43. Dwyer, F. M. The effect of overt responses in improving visually programmed science instruction.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1972,9, 47–55.Google Scholar
  44. Dwyer, F. M. On visualized instruction: Effect of students’ entering behavior.Journal of Experimental Education, 1975,43, 78–83.Google Scholar
  45. Dwyer, F. M.Strategies for improving visual learning. State College, Pa.: Learning Services, 1978.Google Scholar
  46. Englander, M., & Harste, J.Cue system utilization among beginning readers. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, April 1979.Google Scholar
  47. EPIE Institute.Selector’s guide for elementary language arts programs. Stony Brook, N.Y.: Author, 1981.Google Scholar
  48. Evans, T., & Denny, M. R. Emotionality of pictures and the retention of related and unrelated phrases.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1978,11, 149–152.Google Scholar
  49. Findahl, O.The effect of visual illustrations upon perception and retention of news programmes. Stockholm: Swedish Broadcasting Corporation, 1971. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 054 631)Google Scholar
  50. Fleming, M. L. Classification and analysis of instructional illustrations.AV Communication Review, 1967,15, 246–256.Google Scholar
  51. Freisinger, S. D.The effect of cartoon-embellished programmed textual instruction on students’ learning and affective learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Anaheim, Calif., March–April 1976. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 128 008)Google Scholar
  52. Friedman, A. Framing pictures: The role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1979,208, 316–355.Google Scholar
  53. Gambrell, L. B., Koskinen, P. S., & Cole, J. N.The effects of induced mental imagery upon comprehension: A comparison of written versus oral presentation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, San Diego, December 1980.Google Scholar
  54. Garrison, W. T.The context bound effects of picture-text amalgams: Two studies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell University, 1978.Google Scholar
  55. Goldberg, F. Effects of imagery on learning incidental material in the classroom.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1974,66, 233–237.Google Scholar
  56. Goodykoontz, B. The relation of pictures to reading comprehension.Elementary English Review, 1936,13, 125–130.Google Scholar
  57. Gustafsson, J. E. Differential effects of imagery instructions on pupils with different abilities.Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 1978,21, 157–179.Google Scholar
  58. Hagen, M. A., & Jones, R. K. Cultural effects of pictorial perception: How many words is one picture really worth? In R. D. Walk & H. L. Pick, Jr. (Eds.),Perception and experience. New York: Plenum Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  59. Halbert, M. G. An experimental study of children’s understanding of instructional materials.Bulletin of the Bureau of School Service (University of Kentucky, College of Education), 1943, 25(4).Google Scholar
  60. Haring, M.J. Picture enrichment of delayed recall: Support from a unique source. Paper presented at the annual meeting of The Psychonomic Society, Phoenix, November 1979.Google Scholar
  61. Haring, M. J., & Fry, M. A. Effect of pictures on children’s comprehension of written text.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 1979,27, 185–190.Google Scholar
  62. Harzern, P., Lee, I., & Miles, T. R. The effects of learning to read.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1976,46, 318–322.Google Scholar
  63. Holliday, W. G. The effects of verbal and adjunct pictorial-verbal information in science instruction.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1975,22, 77–83.Google Scholar
  64. Holliday, W. G. Conceptualizing and evaluating learner aptitudes related to instructional stimuli in science education.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1976,13, 101–109. (a)Google Scholar
  65. Holliday, W. G. Teaching verbal chains using flow diagrams and texts.AV Communication Review, 1976,24, 63–78. (b)Google Scholar
  66. Holliday, W. G., Brunner, L. L., & Donais, E. L. Differential cognitive and affective responses to flow diagrams in science.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1977,14, 129–138.Google Scholar
  67. Holliday, W. G., & Harvey, D. A. Adjunct labeled drawings in teaching physics to junior high school students.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1976,13, 37–43.Google Scholar
  68. Holliday, W. G., & Thursby, P. MTeaching visual concepts in the classroom. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Miami, April 1977.Google Scholar
  69. Hughes, L. H., Langdon, C. A., & Kim, Y. S.Comprehension of discourse at high rates with redundant pictures. Paper presented at the annual meeting of The Psychonomic Society, Philadelphia, November 1981.Google Scholar
  70. Ibison, R. A.Differential effects in the recall of textual materials associated with the inclusion of colored and uncolored illustrations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, 1951.Google Scholar
  71. Jagodzinska, M. The role of illustrations in verbal learning.Polish Psychological Bulletin, 1976,7, 95–104.Google Scholar
  72. Jahoda, G., Cheyne, W. M., Deregowski, J. B., Sinha, D., & Collingbourne, R. Utilization of pictorial information in classroom learning: A cross cultural study.AV Communication Review, 1976,24, 295–315.Google Scholar
  73. Joseph, J. H.The instructional effectiveness of integrating abstract and realistic visualization. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, 1978.Google Scholar
  74. Kennedy, J. M.A psychology of picture perception. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1974.Google Scholar
  75. Knowlton, J. Q. On the definition of “picture.”AV Communication Review, 1966,14, 157–183.Google Scholar
  76. Koenke, K., & Otto, W. Contribution of pictures to children’s comprehension of the main idea in reading.Psychology in the Schools, 1969,6, 298–302.Google Scholar
  77. Koran, M. L., & Koran, J. J. Interaction of learner characteristics with pictorial adjuncts in learning from science text.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1980,27, 477–483.Google Scholar
  78. Kulhavy, R. W., & Swenson, I. Imagery instructions and the comprehension of text.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1975,45, 47–51.Google Scholar
  79. Lang, R. J., & Solman, R. T. Effect of pictures on learning to read common nouns.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1979,49, 138–149.Google Scholar
  80. Lesgold, A. M., Levin, J. R., Shimron, J., & Guttmann, J. Pictures and young children’s learning from oral prose.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1975,67, 636–642.Google Scholar
  81. Lesgold, A. M., McCormick, C., & Golinkoff, R. M. Imagery training and children’s prose learning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1975,67, 663–667.Google Scholar
  82. Levin, J. R. Inducing comprehension in poor readers: A test of a recent model.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1973,65, 19–24.Google Scholar
  83. Levin, J. R. On functions of pictures in prose. In F. J. Pirozzolo & M. C. Wittrock (Eds.),Neurophysiological and cognitive processes in reading. New York: Academic Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  84. Levin, J. R., Bender, B. G., & Lesgold, A. M. Pictures, repetition, and young children’s oral prose learning.AV Communication Review, 1976,24, 367–380.Google Scholar
  85. Levin, J. R., & Berry, J. K. Children’s learning of all the news that’s fit to picture.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 1980,28, 177–185.Google Scholar
  86. Levin, J. R., & Divine-Hawkins, P. Visual imagery as a prose-learning process.Journal of Reading Behavior, 1974,6, 23–30.Google Scholar
  87. Levin, J. R., Divine-Hawkins, P., Kerst, S. M., & Guttmann, J. Individual differences in learning from pictures and words: The development and application of an instrument.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1974,66, 296–303.Google Scholar
  88. Levin, J. R., & Lesgold, A. M. On pictures in prose.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 1978,26, 233–243.Google Scholar
  89. Litcher, J., & Johnson, D. Changes in attitudes toward Negroes and white elementary school students after use of multi-ethnic readers.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1969,60, 148–152.Google Scholar
  90. Maher, J., & Sullivan, H.Differential effects of imagery and stimulus form on prose learning of fourth and sixth graders. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Los Angeles, April 1981.Google Scholar
  91. Miller, W. A. Reading with and without pictures.Elementary School Journal, 1938,38, 676–682.Google Scholar
  92. Montare, A., Elman, E., & Cohen, J. Words and pictures: A test of Samuels’ findings.Journal of Reading Behavior, 1977,9, 269–285.Google Scholar
  93. Moore, A. M.Investigation of the effect of patterns of illustrations on third graders’ comprehension of information. Doctoral dissertation, Kent State University, 1975. (University Microfilms No. 75-20, 604)Google Scholar
  94. Moore, D. W., & Readence, J. E.A meta-anatysis of graphic organizers on learning from text. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, San Antonio, December 1979.Google Scholar
  95. Nahinsky, I. D., & Oeschger, D. E. The influence of specific stimulus information on the concept learning process.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1975,1, 660–670.Google Scholar
  96. Olson, D. R. The languages of instruction: The literate bias of schooling. In R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro, & W. E. Montague (Eds.),Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1977.Google Scholar
  97. Optical Society of America, Committee on Colorimetry.The science of color. New York: Crowell, 1953.Google Scholar
  98. Paivio, A.Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, 1971.Google Scholar
  99. Paivio, A., & Csapo, K. Concrete image and verbal memory codes.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969,80, 279–285.Google Scholar
  100. Paradowski, W. Effect of curiosity on incidental learning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1967,58, 50–55.Google Scholar
  101. Parish, T. S., Bryant, W. T., & Prawat, R. S. Reversing effects of sexism in elementary school girls through counterconditioning.Journal of Instructional Psychology, 19774(4), 11–16.Google Scholar
  102. Parkhurst, P. E.Assessing the effectiveness of selfpaced visualized instruction: A multifactor analysis on five different educational tasks. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, 1974.Google Scholar
  103. Peeck, J. Retention of pictorial and verbal content of a text with illustrations.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1974,66, 880–888.Google Scholar
  104. Peeck,J. Experimenter-provided and learner-generated pictures in learning from text. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, April 1980.Google Scholar
  105. Pepper, J. Following students’ suggestions for rewriting a computer programming textbook.American Educational Research Journal, 1981,18, 259–269.Google Scholar
  106. Phillips, R. J. Making maps easy to read-A summary of research. In P. A. Koler, M. E. Wrolstad, & H. Bouma (Eds.),Processing of visible language (Vol. 1). New York: Plenum Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  107. Pierce, J. W. Field independence and imageryassisted prose recall of children.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1980,72, 200–203.Google Scholar
  108. Pillemer, D. B., & Light, R. J. Synthesizing outcomes: How to use research evidence from many studies.Harvard Educational Review, 1980,50, 176–195.Google Scholar
  109. Popham, W. J. Pictorial embellishments in a tape-slide instructional program.AV Communication Review, 1969,17, 28–35.Google Scholar
  110. Potash, L. M. Design of maps and map-related research.Human Factors, 1977,19, 139–150.Google Scholar
  111. Pressley, M. Mental imagery helps eight-yearolds remember what they read.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1976,68, 355–359.Google Scholar
  112. Pressley, M. Imagery and children’s learning: Putting the picture in developmental perspective.Review of Educational Research, 1977,47, 585–622.Google Scholar
  113. Pressley, M., Levin, J. R., & Hope, D.J. Do mismatched pictures interfere with children’s memory of prose? Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Los Angeles, April 1981.Google Scholar
  114. Purkel, W., & Bornstein, M. H. Pictures and imagery both enhance children’s short-term and long-term recall.Developmental Psychology, 1980,16, 153–154.Google Scholar
  115. Rankin, E. F., & Culhane, J. W. One picture equals 1,000 words?Reading Improvement, 1970,7(2), 37–40.Google Scholar
  116. Rasco, R. W., Tennyson, R. D., & Boutwell, R. C. Imagery instructions and drawings in learning prose.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1975,67, 188–192.Google Scholar
  117. Readence, J. E., & Moore, D. W.A meta-analysis of research on the effect of adjunct aids on learning from text. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, April 1980.Google Scholar
  118. Rigney, J. W., & Lutz, K. A. Effect of graphic analogies of concepts in chemistry on learning and attitude.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1976,68, 305–311.Google Scholar
  119. Rohwer, W. D., Jr., & Harris, W. J. Media effects on prose learning in two populations of children,Journal of Educational Psychology, 1975,67, 651–657.Google Scholar
  120. Royer, J. M., & Cable, G. W. Illustrations, analogies, and facultative transfer in prose learning,Journal of Educational Psychology, 1976,68, 205–209.Google Scholar
  121. Ruch, M. D., & Levin, J. R. Pictorial organization versus verbal repetition of children’s prose: Evidence for processing differences.AV Communication Review, 1977,25, 269–280.Google Scholar
  122. Ruch, M. D., & Levin, J. R. Partial pictures and imagery-retrieval cues in young children’s prose recall.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1979,28, 268–279.Google Scholar
  123. Rudolph, H. J.Attention and interest factors in advertising. New York: Funk & Wagnalls, 1947.Google Scholar
  124. Rusted, J., & Coltheart, M. Facilitation of children’s prose recall by the presence of pictures.Memory and Cognition, 1979,7, 354–359.Google Scholar
  125. Rusted, J., & Coltheart, V. The effect of pictures on the retention of novel words and prose passages.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1979,28, 516–524.Google Scholar
  126. Samuels, S. J. Attentional processes in reading: The effect of pictures in the acquisition of reading responses.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1967,58, 337–342.Google Scholar
  127. Samuels, S. J. Effects of pictures on learning to read, comprehension and attitudes.Review of Educational Research, 1970,40, 397–407.Google Scholar
  128. Samuels, S. J., Biesbrock, E., & Terry, P. R. The effect of pictures on children’s attitudes toward presented stories.The Journal of Educational Research, 1974,67, 243–246.Google Scholar
  129. Schallert, D. L. The role of illustrations in reading comprehension. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.),Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1980.Google Scholar
  130. Schwartz, N. H., & Kulhavy, R. W. Map features and the recall of discourse.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1981,6, 151–158.Google Scholar
  131. Sewell, E. H., Jr., & Moore, R. L. Cartoon embellishments in informative presentations.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 1980,28, 39–46.Google Scholar
  132. Sherman, J. L. Contextual information and prose comprehension.Journal of Reading Behavior, 1976,8, 369–379.Google Scholar
  133. Singer, H., Samuels, S. J., & Spiroff, J. The effect of pictures and contextual conditions on learning responses to printed words.Reading Research Quarterly, 1973-1974,9, 555–567.Google Scholar
  134. Small, M. Y., Dowling, S. B., & Lovett, S. B.Semantic elaboration and children’s recall of picture and prose information. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Los Angeles, April 1981.Google Scholar
  135. Snowman, J., & Cunningham, D. J. A comparison of pictorial and written adjunct aids in learning from text.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1975,67, 307–311.Google Scholar
  136. Steingart, S. K., & Glock, M. D. Imagery and the recall of connected discourse.Reading Research Quarterly, 1979,15, 66–82.Google Scholar
  137. Stone, D. E., & Glock, M. D. How do young adults read directions with and without pictures?Journal of Educational Psychology, 1981,73, 419–426.Google Scholar
  138. Stromnes, F. J., & Nyman, J. Immediate and long-term retention of connected concrete discourse as a function of mnemonic picture-type sequence and context.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1974,15, 197–202.Google Scholar
  139. Tennyson, R. D. Pictorial support and specific instructions as design variables for children’s concept and rule learning.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 1978,26, 291–299.Google Scholar
  140. Thomas, J. L.The influence of pictorial illustrations with written text and previous achievement on the reading comprehension of fourth grade science students. Doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia, 1977. (Shorter version inJournal of Research in Science Teaching, 1978,15, 401–405.)Google Scholar
  141. Thomas, J. L.The influence of pictures with written text and achievement on reading comprehension of elementary students. Unpublished manuscript, North Texas State University, School of Library & Information Sciences, 1978.Google Scholar
  142. Tirre, W. C., Manelis, L., & Leicht, K. L. The effects of imaginai and verbal strategies on prose comprehension by adults.Journal of Reading Behavior, 1979,11, 99–106.Google Scholar
  143. Ude, C. K.The effect over time of pictures on the acquisition of similar and dissimilar sight words by prereaders. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Emory University, 1977.Google Scholar
  144. University of Illinois, Division of Communications.How pictures and graphs aid learning from print: A review of the research evidence. Technical Memorandum No. 4 to the U.S. Air Force Human Resources Research Institute, December 1952.Google Scholar
  145. Vernon, M. D. The value of pictorial illustration.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1953,23, 180–187.Google Scholar
  146. Vernon, M. D. The instruction of children by pictorial illustration.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1954,24, 171–179.Google Scholar
  147. Waldner, D. N.The effect of pictures on the story comprehension and retention of good and poor readers. Doctoral dissertation, University of Denver, 1978. (University Microfilms No. 7910670)Google Scholar
  148. Wardle, K. F.Textbook illustrations: Do they aid reading comprehension? Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Psychological Association, 1977.Google Scholar
  149. Weintraub, S.The effect of pictures on the comprehension of second grade basal readers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, 1960.Google Scholar
  150. Weisberg, J. S. The use of visual advance organizers for learning earth science concepts.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1970,7, 161–165.Google Scholar
  151. Whalley, P. C., & Fleming, R. W. An experiment with a simple recorder of reading behavior.Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 1975,11, 120–123.Google Scholar
  152. Williams, C. M.Learning from pictures. Washington, D.C.: Association for Educational Communications and Technology, 1968.Google Scholar
  153. Willows, D. M. Individual differences in distraction by pictures in a reading situation.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1978,70, 837–847. (a)Google Scholar
  154. Willows, D. M. A picture is not always worth a thousand words: Pictures as distractors in reading.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1978,70, 255–262. (b)Google Scholar
  155. Willows, D. M.Reading comprehension of illustrated and non-illustrated aspects of text. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, April 1979.Google Scholar
  156. Willows, D. M.Effects of picture salience on reading comprehension of illustrated and non-illustrated aspects of text. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, April 1980.Google Scholar
  157. Willows, D. M., Borwick, D., & Hayvren, M. The contents of readers. In T. G. Waller & G. E. MacKinnon (Eds.),Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  158. Winn, W. Effect of attribute highlighting and diagrammatic organization on identification and classification.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1981,18, 23–32.Google Scholar
  159. Winn, W. D., & Holliday, W. G.Learning from diagrams: Theoretical and instructional considerations. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Philadelphia, April 1981.Google Scholar
  160. Yarbus, A. L.Eye movements and vision. New York: Plenum Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Howard Levie
    • 1
  • Richard Lentz
    • 1
  1. 1.School of EducationIndiana UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Audio-Visual CenterIndiana UniversityBloomington

Personalised recommendations