Advertisement

Il Nuovo Cimento A (1965-1970)

, Volume 61, Issue 1, pp 27–40 | Cite as

Quark model and the magnetic moments of proton and neutron

  • Y. Gell
  • D. B. Lichtenberg
Article
First Online:

Summary

It is shown that in order to obtain agreement with experiment for the ratio of the proton to neutron magnetic moment within the framework of the nonrelativistic quark model, the nucleon wave functions must contain orbital angular momentum. Any departure fromSU6-invariant wave functions for proton and neutron not containing orbital angular momentum only enlarges the disagreement with experiment.

Keywords

Wave Function Quark Model Orbital Angular Momentum Nucleon Wave Function Nonrelativistic Quark Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Модель кварков и магинтные моменты протона и нейтрона

Резюме

Показывается, что для получения согласия с экспериментом для отношения магнитного момента протона к магнитному моменту нейтрона в рамках нерелятивистской модели кварков нуклонные функции должны содержать орбитальный момент. Любое отступление отSU6-инвариантных волновых фуикций для протона и нейтрона, не содержащее орбитального момента, только увеличивает расхождение с экспериментом.

Riassunto

Si dimostra che per ottenere l’accordo con i dati sperimentali per il rapporto del momento magnetico del protone e del neutrone nel quadro del modello a quark non relativistico, le funzioni d’onda del nucleone debbono contenere il momento angolare orbitale. Qualsiasi abbandono delle funzioni d’onda per il protone e il neutrone invarianti rispetto all’SU6 che non contengano termini nel momento angolare orbitale non fa che aumentare il disaccordo con i dati sperimentali.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. (1).
    G. Morpurgo:Physics,2, 95 (1965);C. Becchi andG. Morpurgo:Phys. Rev.,140, B 687 (1965).Google Scholar
  2. (2).
    R. H. Dalitz:Proc. Oxford Intl. Conf. on Elementary Particles, 1965. Rutherford High Energy Laboratory, 1966.Google Scholar
  3. (3).
    M. A. Beg, B. W. Lee andA. Pais:Phys. Rev. Lett.,13, 514 (1964).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    M. Y. Han andY. Nambu:Phys. Rev.,139, B 1006 (1965).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    N. Cabibbo, L. Maiani andG. Preparata:Phys. Lett.,25 B, 132 (1967).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. (6).
    O. W. Greenberg:Phys. Rev. Lett.,13, 598 (1964).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. (7).
    J. Franklin:Phys. Rev.,172, 1807 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    A. Pais:Rev. Mod. Phys. 38, 215 (1966).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. (9).
    P. D. De Souza andD. B. Lichtenberg:Phys. Rev.,161, 1513 (1967).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. (10).
    This well-known fact was kindly pointed out to us byH. Harari (private communication).Google Scholar
  11. (11).
    A. I. Akhizer andM. P. Rekalo:JETP Lett.,1, 29 (1965).ADSGoogle Scholar
  12. (12).
    P. N. Bogoliubov: preprint Dubna P2-3115 (1967);E. E. Radescu:Nuovo Cimento,52 A, 1324 (1967).Google Scholar
  13. (13).
    E. Gerjuoy andJ. Schwinger:Phys. Rev.,61, 138 (1942).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. (14).
    R. G. Sachs:Nuclear Theory (Cambridge, 1963), p. 180.Google Scholar
  15. (15).
    G. Derrick andJ. M. Blatt:Nucl. Phys.,8, 310 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Società Italiana di Fisica 1969

Authors and Affiliations

  • Y. Gell
    • 1
  • D. B. Lichtenberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Physics DepartmentTel-Aviv UniversityTel-Aviv

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options