Journal of Economics and Finance

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 249–266 | Cite as

Market mispricings and portfolio allocation to mutual fund classes

Article

Abstract

Major factors affecting Greek household budget flows to mutual fund classes with different risk-return profiles are studied, applying the flexible functional form of the Almost Ideal Demand System to analyse allocation to equity, bond, balanced, and money market funds. An increase in household expenditure can have a positive impact; an adverse price change may erode budget benefits for a class. Volatility in possible “mispricings” in the underlying market valuation, with risk aversion attitudes, can result in asset reallocation. Cross-price effects provide insight on complementarity and substitutability between classes. Conclusions have useful policy implications for asset management and portfolio allocation strategies.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, G. J., and R. W. Blundell. 1982. “Estimation and Hypothesis Testing in Dynamic Singular Equation Systems.”Econometrica 50: 1559–1571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, G. J., and R. W. Blundell. 1983. “Testing Restrictions in a Flexible Dynamic Demand System: An Application to Consumers' Expenditure in Canada.”Review of Economic Studies 50: 397–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennett, A., and M. Young. 2000 “Determinants of Mutual Fund Flows: Evidence from New Zealand.”Discussion Paper, PACAP/FMA Meeting, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
  4. Bera, A. K., R. P. Byron, and C. M. Jarque. 1981. “Further Evidence on Asymptotic Tests for Homogeneity and Symmetry in Large Demand Systems.”Economics Letters 8: 101–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bewley, R. A. 1983. “Tests of Restrictions in Large Demand Systems.”European Economic Review 20: 257–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blake, D., and A. Timmermann. 1998. “Mutual Fund Performance: Evidence from the UK.”European Finance Review 2: 57–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blundell, R. 1988. “Consumer Behaviour: Theory and Application—A Survey.”Economic Journal 98: 16–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell, J. Y., and J. H. Cochrane. 1999. “By Force of Habit: A Consumption-Based Explanation of Aggregate Stock Market Behavior.”Journal of Political Economy 107: 205–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davidson, J. E. H., D. F. Hendry, F. Srba, and S. Yeo 1978. “Econometric Modelling of the Aggregate Time Series Relationship between Consumers’ Expenditure and Income in the United Kingdom.”Economic Journal 88: 661–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deaton, A. S., and J. Muellbauer. 1980a. “An Almost Ideal Demand System.”American Economic Review 70: 312–326.Google Scholar
  11. Deaton, A. S., and J. Muellbauer. 1980b.Economics and Consumer Behaviour, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Edelen, R. M. 1999. “Investor Flows and the Assessed Performance of Open-End Mutual Funds.”Journal of Financial Economics 53: 429–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Edelen, R. M., and J. B. Warner. 1999. “Why are Mutual Fund Flows and Market Returns Related? Evidence from High-Frequency Data.”Working Paper, The Warton School, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  14. Fama, E.F., and M.H. Miller. 1972.The Theory of Finances. Illinois: Dryden Press.Google Scholar
  15. Federation Europeenne des Fonds et Societes d' Investissement. 2001.Statistical Data. www.FEFSI.com.Google Scholar
  16. Fortune, P. 1998. “Mutual Funds, Part II: Fund Flows and Security Returns.”New England Economic Review (January/February): 3–22.Google Scholar
  17. Goetzmann, W. N., and M. Massa. 1999. “Index Funds and Stock Market Growth.”NBER Working Paper, Series w, No. 7033.Google Scholar
  18. Hendry, D. F., and G. E. Mizon. 1980. “Serial Correlation As Convenient Simplification Not a Nuisance: A Comment on a Study of the Demand for Money by the Bank of England.”Economic Journal 88: 549–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Laitinen, K. 1978. “Why Is Demand Homogeneity So Often Rejected?”Economics Letters 1: 187–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Markowitz, H. M. 1959.Portfolio Selection. New York: J. Wiley.Google Scholar
  21. Meinser, J. F. 1979. “The Sad Fate of the Asymptotic Slutsky Symmetry Test for Large Systems.”Economics Letters 2: 231–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Muellbauer, J. 1976. “Community Preferences and the Representative Consumer.”Econometrica, 44: 979–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Muellbauer, J. 1982. “Why do Empirical Demand Functions Violate Homogeneity Tests?”Discussion Paper No. 113, Birkbeck College, University of London.Google Scholar
  24. Muellbauer, J., and P. Pashardes. 1982. “Tests of Dynamic Specification and Homogeneity in Demand Systems.”Discussion Paper No. 125, Birkbeck College, University of London.Google Scholar
  25. Reid, B. 2000. “The 1990s: A Decade of Expansion and Change in the US Mutual Fund Industry.”Perspective 6: 6–14.Google Scholar
  26. Remolona, E. M., P. Kleiman, and D. Gruenstein. 1997. “Market Returns and Mutual Fund Flows.”FRBNY Economic Policy Review (July): 33–52.Google Scholar
  27. Santini, D. L., and J. W. Aber. 1998. “Determinants of Net New Money Flows to the Equity Mutual Fund Industry.”Journal of Economics and Business 50: 419–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sawicki, J. 1996. “Investors’ Response to the Performance of Professional Fund Managers: Evidence from the Australian Wholesale Funds Market.”Working Paper, University of Western Australia.Google Scholar
  29. Sharpe, W. F. 1964. “Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk.”Journal of Finance 19: 425–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sirri E. R., and P. Tufano. 1998. “Costly Search and Mutual Fund Flows.”Journal of Finance 50: 1589–1623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sirri E.R., and P. Tufano. 1992. “The Demand for Mutual Fund Services by Individual Investors.”Working Paper, Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  32. Spanos, A. 1987.Statistical Foundations of Econometric Modelling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Taylor, J. C., and K. W. Clements. 1983. “A Simple Portfolio Allocation Model of Financial Wealth.”European Economic Review 23: 241–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Union of Greek Institutional Investors. 2001.Statistical Data on the Mutual Fund Business. www.ugii.gr.Google Scholar
  35. Warther, V. A. 1995. “Aggregate Mutual Fund Flows and Security Returns.”Journal of Financial Economics 39: 209–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zellner, A. 1962. “An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Tests for Aggregation Bias.”Journal of the American Statistical Association 57: 348–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zietz, J., and R. Weichert. 1988. “A Dynamic Singular Equation System of Asset Demand.”European Economic Review 32: 1349–1357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

©  0144 0147 V 2 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bank of CyprusAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations