Calculation of the decay width of the rho-meson

K. Kawarabayashi andM. Suzuki:Phys. Rev. Lett.,16, 255, 384E (1966), henceforth referred to asK. S.; Riazuddin andFayyazuddin:Phys. Rev.,147, 1071 (1966);F. J. Gilman andH. J. Schnitzer:Phys. Rev.,150, 1362 (1966);D. A. Geffen:Phys. Rev. Lett.,19, 770 (1967).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

M. Gell-Mann andM. Levy:Nuovo Cimento,16, 705 (1960);Y. Nambu:Phys. Rev. Lett.,4, 380 (1960).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

M. Gell-Mann:Phys. Rev.,125, 1067 (1962).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

J. J. Sakurai:Phys. Rev. Lett.,17, 552 (1966);M. Gell-Mann andF. Zachariasen:Phys. Rev.,124, 953 (1961).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

E. T. Whittaker andG. N. Watson:Modern Analysis (Cambridge, 1952), p. 172.Google Scholar

M. Gourdin:Cargese Lectures in Physics, preprint (1967).Google Scholar

J. Schwinger:Phys. Rev. Lett.,3, 296 (1959). See also ref. (6)M. Gourdin:Cargese Lectures in Physics, preprint (1967) andJ. D. Bjorkin:Phys. Rev.,148, 1467 (1966).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

T. D. Lee, S. Weinberg andB. Zumino:Phys. Rev. Lett.,18, 1029 (1967).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

V. L. Auslander, G. I. Budker, Ju. N. Pestov, V. A. Sidorov, A. N. Skrinsky andH. G. Khabakhpashev:Phys. Lett.,25 B, 433 (1967). This reference reports data obtained from an electron-positron colliding-beam experiment. The width so obtained seems preferable to the much larger value, 128 MeV, assigned byRosenfeld et al., UCRL-8030, Sept. 1967, since the latter presumably contains final-state interactions (πN→ρN) which are absent in the much simpler reaction (e⁺e⁻→ρ).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar