Is axillary temperature an appropriate surrogate for core temperature?
The ideal technique for measuring temperature should be rapid, painless, reproducible and accurately reflect the core temperature. While axillary temperature is commonly used because of convenience and safety, there are conflicting reports abouts its accuracy. To determine whether axillary temperature can act as a surrogate for oral/rectal temperatures, a prospective comparative study was conducted. The axillary and rectal temperatures (Group 1: infants < 1 year age) and axillary and oral temperatures (Group 2: children 6–14 years age) were compared using mercury-in-glass, thermometers. Various tests of agreement were applied to the data obtained. Rectal and axillary temperatures for infants agreed well; the mean difference (95% limits of agreement) between the two being 0.6°C (−0.3°C, 1.4°C). Similarly, the mean difference (95% limits of agreement) between oral and axillary measurements for children aged 6–14 years was observed to be 0.6°C (−0.4°C, 1.4°C). Axillary temperature appears to be an acceptable alternative to rectal/oral temperature measurements in children.
Key wordsTemperature measurements Axillary Tests of agreement
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Lorin M. Measurement of body temperature.Semin Pediatr Infect Dis 1993; 4: 4–18.Google Scholar
- 11.Anagnostakis D, Matsaniolis N, Grafakos S, Sarafidou E. Rectal-axillary temperature difference in febrile and afebrile infants and children.Clin Pediatr 1993; 32: 268–272.Google Scholar
- 12.Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement betwen, two methods of clinical measurement.Lancet 1986; i: 307–310.Google Scholar
- 13.Editorial. Hazards of temperature taking.BMJ 1970; 3: 4–5.Google Scholar