Reaction Kinetics and Catalysis Letters

, Volume 41, Issue 5, pp 679–687 | Cite as

The kinetics of hydrocarbon conversion on ZSM-5 zeolites

  • M. A. Botavina
  • N. V. Nekrasov
  • S. L. Kiperman
Article

Abstract

The complete oxidation of hydrocarbons with various structures (methane, n and wo-pentanes, cyclohexane, and benzene) on copper-modified ZSM-5 zeolite and the aromatization of propane on H-ZSM-5, are studied to analyze diffusion effects on the reaction kinetics. Comparison of the kinetic parameters of complete oxidation shows that the process rate and the rate law strongly depend on the reactant structure. Apparently, n-pentane oxidation is controlled by kinetics; the kinetics for other hydrocarbons depends on diffusion inside zeolite channels to different degrees. In the case of propane aromatization, its dehydrogenation and cracking, as well as the formation of aromatics from olefins, occurs on different active sites. Propane conversion is supposed to occur inside the zeolite channels, and the aromatization of olefins occurs on the outer surface of the zeolite crystal

Keywords

Zeolite Methane Oxidation Aromatization Complete Oxidation Propane Conversion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Minachev, Kh.M. and Kharlamov, V.V.,Okislitel’novosstanovitel’nyi kataliz na tseolitakh (Redox Catalysis on Zeolites), Moscow: Nauka, 1990.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Armor, J.N.,Appl. Catal., B, 1992, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kucherov, A.V., Slinkin, A.A., Goryashenko, S.S., and Slovetskaya, K.I.,J. Catal., 1989, vol. 118, no. 2, p. 459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kucherov, A.V., Kucherova, T.N., and Slinkin, A.A.,Kinet. Katal, 1992, vol. 33, no. 3, p. 618.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ebitani, K. and Morokawa, M., Kim Jong-Ho,et al., J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans., 1994, vol. 90, no. 2, p. 337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yushchenko, V.V., Vanegas, K.F., and Romanovskii, B.V.,Kinet. Katal., 1988, vol. 29, no. 6, p. 1366.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yushchenko, V.V., Vanegas, K.F., Romanovskii, B.V., and Meged’, N.F.,Kinet. Katal., 1988, vol. 29, no. 6, p. 1372.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yushchenko, V.V., Limova, T.V., Tursunalieva, K.S., and Vanegas, K.F.,Kinet. Katal., 1991, vol. 32, no. 6, p. 1455.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Weisz, P.B., Frilete, V.J., Maatman, R.W., and Mower, E.B.,J. Catal., 1962, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kharson, M.S. Kulesh, I.A., Bulatova (Botavina), M.A.,et al., Kinet. Katal., 1996, vol. 37, no. 1, p. 72.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bulatova (Botavina), M.A., Kulech, I.A., Kharson, M.S., and Kiperman S.L.,Abstracts of Europacat-II, Maastricht, 1995, p. 290.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bashkirova, S.G. and Kiperman, S.L.,Kinet. Katal., 1970, vol. 11, no. 3, p. 631.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rudham, R. and Sanders, M.K.,J. Catal., 1972, vol. 27, p. 287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Slinkin, A.A., Kucherov, A.V., Chuvylkin, N.D.,et al., J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans., 1989, vol. 85, no. 10, p. 3233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Datema, K.P., den Ouden, C.J.J., Ylstra, W.D.,et al., J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans., 1991, vol. 87, no. 12, p. 1935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Karge, J. and Ruthven, D.M.,Diffusion in Zeolites, New York: Willey, 1992.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Prinz, D. and Riekert, L.,Ber. Bunsen-Ges. Phys. Chem., 1986, vol. 90, no. 2, p. 413.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Voogd, P.,Ph.D. Thesis, Delft: Technische Universiteit Delft, 1991.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chow, H. and Park, D.H.,J. Catal., 1988, vol. 114, no. 1, p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Caro, J., Hocevar, S., Karger, J., and Riekert, L.,Zeolites, 1986, vol. 6, no. 3, p. 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kiperman, S.L.,Kinetika geterogennykh kataliticheskikh reaktsii. Metodicheskie voprosy kinetiki (Kinetics of Heterogeneous Catalytic Reactions: Methodological Problems of Kinetics), Chernogolovka: Inst. of Chem. Phys., 1983, p. 5.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kol’tsov, N.I. and Kiperman, S.L.,Teor. Eksp. Khim., 1976, vol. 12, no. 6, p. 789.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Koltsov, N.I. and Kiperman, S.L.,J. Res. Inst. Catal. Hokkaido Univ., 1978, vol. 26, no. 2, p. 85.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gorskii, V.G., Katsman, E.A., Klebanova, F.D., and Grigor’ev, A.A.,Teor. Eksp. Khim., 1987, vol. 23, no. 2, p. 191.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Boreskov, G.K.,Getemgennyi kataliz (Heterogeneous Catalysis), Moscow: Nauka, 1986.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Guisnet, M., Gnep, N.S., Aittaled, D., and Doyment, Y.J.,Appl. Catal. A, 1992, vol. 87, no. 2, p. 255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Harris, J.L., Krisko, N., and Wang, X.M.,Appl. Catal. A, 1992, vol. 83, no. 1, p. 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bandiera, J. and Ben Taarit, Y.,Appl. Catal A, 1990, vol. 62, no. 2, p. 309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gnep, N.S., Doyement, J.Y., Seco, A.M.,et al., Appl Catal. A, 1988, vol. 43, no. 1, p. 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mole, T., Anderson, J.R., and Greer, G.,Appl. Catal. A, 1985, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Scurrel, M.S.,Appl. Catal., A, 1988, vol. 41, no. 1, p. 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lukyanov, D.B., Gnep, N.S., and Guisnet, M.,Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 1994, vol. 33, no. 2, p. 222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jagannath, D., Yajnavalkya, S.B., and Anand, B.H.,Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 1994, vol. 33, no. 2, p. 246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© MAIK “Nauka/Interperiodica” 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. A. Botavina
    • 1
  • N. V. Nekrasov
    • 1
  • S. L. Kiperman
    • 1
  1. 1.Zelinskii Institute of Organic ChemistryRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations