Researches on Population Ecology

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 123–134 | Cite as

Analysis of the aggregation behavior in the larvae ofHarmonia axyridis Pallas (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) to prey colony

  • Akira Kawai
Article

Summary

The searching and handling behaviors ofHarmonia axyridis larvae to the colony ofRhopalosiphum padi were experimentally examined and the processes of their aggregation to the prey colony was analyzed.

All the instar larvae searched for the prey at random and they have no preference to the prey colony, but except the 1st instar they tend to aggregate to the plants with prey colonies. The 1st instar larvae tend to stay on the plants they once located. The 2nd to 4th instar larvae often emigrate from the plants without prey colony but seldom emigrate from the plants with prey colonies, and consequently, they aggregate to the plants with prey colonies. The expense of time to eat prey (in the 2nd and 3rd instars) and the change of searching behavior for the prey after feeding (in the 3rd and 4th instars) are responsible for the larval concentration to prey colony as a trapping effect for predators to prey colony.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Banks, C.J. (1954) The searching behaviour of coccinellid larvae.Brit. J. Anim. Behav.2: 37–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Banks, C.J. (1956) The distribution of coccinellid egg batches and larvae in relation to numbers ofAphis fabae Scop. onVicia faba.Bull. Ent. Res.47: 47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banks, C.J. (1957) The behaviour of individual coccinellid larvae on plants.Brit. J. Anim. Behav.5: 12–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dixon, A.F.G. (1959) An experimental study of the searching behaviour of the predatory coccinellid beetleAdalia decempunctata (L.).J. Anim. Ecol.28: 259–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fleschner, C.A. (1950) Studies on searching capacity of three predators of the citrus red mite.Hirgardia20: 233–265.Google Scholar
  6. Hassell, M.P. (1966) Evaluation of parasite or predator responses.J. Anim. Ecol.35: 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Holling, C.S. (1959) Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism.Can. Ent.91: 385–398.Google Scholar
  8. Holling, C.S. (1961) Principles of insect predation.Ann. Rev. Ent.6: 163–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kaddou, I.K. (1960) The feeding behaviour ofHippodamia quinquesignatata (Kirby) larvae.Univ. Calif. Publ. Entomol.16: 181–232.Google Scholar
  10. Putman, W.L. (1955) Bionomics ofStethorus punctillumWeise (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in Ontario,Can. Ent.87: 9–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Solomon, M.E. (1949) The natural control of animal populations.J. Anim. Ecol.18: 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Solomon, M.E. (1964) Analysis of processes involved in the natural control of insects,Adv. Ecol. Res.2: 1–58.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Population Ecology 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • Akira Kawai
    • 1
  1. 1.Entomological Laboratory, College of AgricultureKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations