Journal of Economics and Finance

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 294–301 | Cite as

Friday the 13th and the philosophical basis of financial economics

Article

Abstract

The Friday the 13th anomaly of Kolb and Rodriguez (1987) is revisited in an international context. Drawing on the philosophy of science approach of Lakatos (1978), the paper argues the importance of “anomalies” and the need for triangulation. Using the FTSE world indices over 1988–2000 for 19 countries, it is found that there is some evidence that returns on Friday the 13th are statistically different from, and generally greater than, returns on other Fridays. The paper concludes with a brief discussion of the possibility of an emergent paradigm incorporating work such as Jacobsen and Bouman (1998) and Kamstra, Kramer, and Levi (2000a).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agrawal, Anup, and Kishore Tandon. 1994. “Anomalies Or Illusions?: Evidence From Stock Markets In Eighteen Countries.”Journal of International Money And Finance 13: 83–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ariel, Robert. 1987. “A Monthly Effect In Stock Returns?”Journal Of Financial Economics 18: 161–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balaban, Ercan, Asli Bayar, and Ozgur Berk Kan. 1998.Day of the Week Effects and Asymmetric Conditional Volatility in World Stock Markets. Ankara: Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey.Google Scholar
  4. Brockman, Paul. 1995. “A Review and Analysis of the Holiday Effect.”Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments 4: 37–58.Google Scholar
  5. Brockman, Paul, and David Michayluk. 1998. “The Persistent Holiday Effect: Additional Evidence.”Applied Economics Letters 5: 205–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cadsby, Charles, and Mitchell Ratner. 1992. “Turn of the Month and Pre Holiday Effects on Stock Returns: Some International Evidence.”Journal of Banking and Finance 16: 497–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chamberlain, Trevor, C. Sherman Cheung, and Clarence Kwan. 1991. “The Friday the Thirteenth Effect: Myth Or Reality.”Quarterly Journal Of Business And Economics 30: 111–118.Google Scholar
  8. Chan, M. W. Luke, Anya Khanthavit, and Hugh Thomas. 1996. “Seasonality and Cultural Influences on Four Asian Stock Markets.”Asia Pacific Journal of Management 13: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chang, Eric, J. Michael Pinegar, and R. Ravichandran. 1993. “International Evidence on the Robustness of the Day-of-the-Week Effect.”Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 26: 497–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coutts, J. Andrew. 1999. “Friday the Thirteenth and the Financial Times Industrial Ordinary Shares Index 1935–94.”Applied Economics Letters 6: 35–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dyl, Edward, and Edwin Maberly. 1988. “The Anomaly That Isn't There: A Comment on Friday the Thirteenth.”Journal of Finance 43: 1285–1286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fama, Eugene. 1965. “The Behaviour of Stock Market Prices.”Journal of Business 38: 34–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frankfurter, George, and Elton McGoun. 1999. “Ideology and the Theory of Financial Economics.”Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organizations 39: 159–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hussey, Jill, and Roger Hussey. 1998.Business Research. London: McMillan.Google Scholar
  15. Jacobsen, Ben, and Sven Bouman. 1998. “The Halloween Indicator, ‘Sell in May and Go Away’: Another Puzzle.” University of Amsterdam Working Paper Series, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  16. Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk.”Econometrica 47: 264–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. 1982. “Intuitive Predictions:, Biases and Corrections.” InJudgement Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, edited by Daniel Kanheman, P., Slovic, and A. Tversky. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Kamstra, Mark J., Lisa A. Kramer, and Maurice D. Levi. 2000a. “Losing Sleep At The Market: The Daylight Saving Anomaly.”The American Economic Review 90: 1005–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kamstra, Mark J., Lisa A. Kramer, and Maurice D. Levi. 2000b. “Winter Blues: Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD), the January Effect, and Stock Market Returns.” Working paper, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Colombia.Google Scholar
  20. Kolb, Robert, and Ricardo Rodriguez. 1987. “Friday the Thirteenth Part VII: A Note.”Journal of Finance 42: 1385–1387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kolb, Robert. 1993. “Theory Succession, the CAPM and the APT.”Managerial Finance 19: 1–23.Google Scholar
  22. Lakatos, Imre. 1978.The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Lakonishok, Josef, and Seymour Smidt. 1988. “Are Seasonal Anomalies Real? A Ninety Year Perspective.”Journal of Financial Studies 1: 403–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mandlebrot, Benoit. 1964. “The Variation of Certain Speculative Prices.” InThe Random Character of Stock Prices, edited by Paul Cootner. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  25. Mills, Terence, and J. Andrew Coutts. 1995. “Calendar Effects in the London Stock Exchange FT-SE indices.”The European Journal of Finance 1: 79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pickering, David. 1995.Dictionary of Superstitions. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  27. Popper, Karl 1959.The Logic of Discovery. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  28. Radford, Mona, and Edwin Radford. 1969.Encyclopaedia of Superstitions. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  29. Saunders, Edward. 1993. “Stock Prices and Wall Street Weather.”The American Economic Review 83: 1337–1346.Google Scholar
  30. Saunders, Edward. 1994. “Testing the Efficient Markets Hypothesis without Assumptions”.Journal of Portfolio Management: 28–30.Google Scholar
  31. Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. 1986. “Rational Choice and the Framing of Decision.”Journal of Business 59: S251-S282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Business StudiesUniversity of Dublin, Trinity CollegeDublin 2Ireland

Personalised recommendations