Advertisement

Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965)

, Volume 28, Issue 6, pp 1272–1293 | Cite as

Covariant statistical treatment of antiproton annihilation

  • J. McConnell
  • J. Shapiro
Article

Summary

Low-energy experimental results for antiproton-proton annihilation are used to determine interaction volumes for pions and kaons. The information so obtained is utilised to make predictions for production of elementary particles, excluding isobars, for antiproton momenta 3GeV/c, 6GeV/c, 9.14GeV/c.

Riassunto

Si impiegano alcuni risultati sperimentali sull’annichilamento antiprotone protone per determinare i volumi di interazione per pioni e kaoni. I dati cosi ottenuti si utilizzano per fare previsioni sulla produzione di particelle elementari, esclusi gli isobari, per impulsi dell’antiprotone, 3 GeV/c, 6 GeV/c, 9.14GeV/c.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. (1).
    E. Fermi:Progr. Theor. Phys.,5, 570 (1950).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. (2).
    P. Srivastava andG. Stjdarshan:Phys. Rev.,110, 765 (1958).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. (3).
    T. Hoang, W. Fowler andW. Powell: U.C.R.L.-8994 (1960).Google Scholar
  4. (4).
    Y. Teivin andA. De Shalit:Nuovo Cimento,1, 1146 (1955).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    J. Shapiro:Suppl. Nuovo Cimento,18, 40 (1960).CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. (6).
    T. Kalogeropoulos: U.C.R.L.-8677 (1959).Google Scholar
  7. (7).
    W. Barkas, R. Birge, W. Chupp, A. Ekspong, G. Goldhaber, S. Gold-haber, H. Heckman, D. Perkins, J. Sandweiss, E. Segre, P. Smith, D. Stork, L. van Rosstjm, E. Amaldi, G. Baroni, C. Castagnoli, C. Franzinetti andA. Man-fredini:Phys. Rev.,105, 1037 (1957).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    O. Chamberlain, G. Goldhaber, L. Jauneau, T. Kalogeropoulos, E. Segrè andR. Silbergerg:Phys. Rev.,113, 1615 (1959).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. (9).
    N. Horowitz, D. Miller, J. Murray andR. Tripp:Phys. Rev.,115, 472 (1959).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. (10).
    L. Agnew, T. Eliofe, W. Fowler, R. Lander, W. Powell, E. Segre, H. Steiner, H. White, C. Wiegand andT. Ypsilantis:Phys. Rev.,118, 1371 (1960).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. (11).
    S. Goldhaber, G. Goldhaber, W. Powell andE. Silberbeeg:PhyS. Rev.,121, 1525 (1961).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. (12).
    G. Kalbfleisch: U.C.E.L.-9597 (1961).Google Scholar
  13. (13).
    J. Button, P. Eberhakd, G. Kalbfleisch, J. Lannutti, G. Lynch, G. Maglič, M. Stevenson andN. Xuong:Phys. Rev.,121, 1788 (1961).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. (14).
    For the experimental charged prong distribution of.Proc. of 1960 Annual International Conference on High-Energy Physios at Rochester, p. 155.Google Scholar
  15. (15).
    T. Elioff, L. Agnew, O. Chamberlain, H. Steiner, C. Wiegand andT. Ypsi-lantis:Phys. Rev. Lett.,3, 285 (1961).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. (16).
    N. Xuong, G. Lynch andC. Hinrichs:Phys. Rev.,124, 575 (1961).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Società Italiana di Fisica 1963

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. McConnell
    • 1
  • J. Shapiro
    • 1
  1. 1.Physics DepartmentFordham UniversityNew York

Personalised recommendations