Il Nuovo Cimento A (1965-1970)

, Volume 33, Issue 1, pp 23–46 | Cite as

A double nucleon exchange model for the « ABC » production in the pn → d (ππ)0 reaction

  • J. C. Anjos
  • D. Levy
  • A. Santoro
Article

Summary

A double nucleon exchange model is proposed for the ABC production in the pn → d(ππ)0 reaction. Important low-mass enhancements are obtained in the invariant ππ mass spectrum similarly to what happens in a Deck model. The same type of mechanism also provides an explanation for the experimentally observed peak at the highest invariant ππ masses.

Модель с двойным нуклонным обменом для « АВС » рождения в реакции pn → d(ππ)0

Реэюме

Предлагается модель с двойным нуклонным обменом для « АВС » рождения в реакции pn → d(ππ)0. В спектре инвариантной ππ массы обнаружены важные пики при малых массах, аналогично тому, что происходит в модели Декка. Укаэанный механиэм также общясняет зкспериментально обнаруженный пик при больщих инвариантных ππ массах.

Riassunto

Si propone un modello di scambio di due nucleoni per la produzione di ABC nella reazione pn → d(ππ)0. Si ottengono importanti aumenti di piccola massa nello spettro di massa ππ invariante analogamente a quello che avviene in un modello di Deck. Lo stesso tipo di meccanismo fornisce anche una spiegazione per il picco osservato sperimentalmente alle maggiori masse invarianti di ππ.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. (1).
    A. Abashian, N. E. Booth, K. M. Crowe, R. E. Hill andE. H. Rogers:Phys. Rev.,132, 2296 (1963).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. (2).
    J. H. Hall, T. A. Murray andL. Riddiford:Nucl. Phys.,12 B, 573 (1969).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. (3).
    J. Banaigs, J. Berger, L. Goldzahl, T. Risser, L. Vu-Hai, M. Cottereau andC. Lebrun:Nucl. Phys.,67 B, 1 (1973).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    G. Bizard, F. Bonthonneau, M. Cottereau, J. L. Laville, C. Le Brun, F. Lefebvres, J. C. Malherbe, R. Regimbart, J. Duflo, L. Goldzahl, F. Plouin andL. Vu-Hai: communication to theConference at Uppsala, June 1973.Google Scholar
  5. (5).
    J. Banaigs, J. Berger, L. Goldzahl, T. Risser, L. Vu-Hai, M. Cottereau, C. Le Brun, F. L. Fabbri andP. Picozza:Phys. Lett.,43 B, 535 (1973).ADSGoogle Scholar
  6. (6)a).
    N. E. Booth andA. Abashian:Phys. Rev.,132, 2314 (1963)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. (6)b).
    M. Jacob’ G. Mahoux andR. Omnés:Nuovo Cimento,23, 838 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. (7).
    J. L. Basdevant, C. D. Frogart andJ. L. Petersen:Nucl. Phys.,72 B, 413 (1974).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. (8).
    H. Brody:Phys. Rev. Lett.,28, 1217 (1972).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. (9).
    T. Risser andM. D. Shuster:Phys. Lett.,43 B, 68 (1973).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. (10).
    J. C. Anjos, D. Levy andA. Santoro:Nucl. Phys.,67 B, 37 (1973).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. (11) a).
    S. D. Drell andK. Hiida:Phys. Rev. Lett.,7, 199 (1961);CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. (11) b).
    R. T. Deck:Phys. Rev. Lett.,13, 169 (1964);CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. (11) c).
    E. L. Berger:Phys. Rev.,166, 1525 (1968).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. (12).
    G. Fox:Peripheral Production of Resonances, Proceedings of the Third Philadelphia Conference on Experimental Meson Spectroscopy, Philadelphia, 1972 (New York, N. Y., 1972), p. 271.Google Scholar
  16. (13) a).
    J. Letourneaux andJ. M. Eisenberg:Nucl. Phys.,87, 331 (1966);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. (13) b).
    W. B. Jones andJ. M. Eisenberg:Nucl. Phys.,154 A, 49 (1970);CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  18. (13) c).
    E. Rost andP. D. Kunz:Phys. Lett.,43 B, 17 (1973);CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. (13) d).
    J. M. Eisenberg, R. Guy, J. V. Noble andH. J. Weber:Phys. Lett.,45 B, 93 (1973);CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  20. (13) e).
    M. P. Keating andJ. A. Wills:Phys. Rev. C,7, 1336 (1973);CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  21. (13) f).
    G. A. Miller:Phys. Rev. C (to be published);Google Scholar
  22. (13) g).
    M. Dillig, H. M. Hofmann andM. G. Huber:Phys. Lett.,44 B, 484 (1973).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  23. (14).
    J. Kirz, J. Schwartz andR. D. Tripp:Phys. Rev.,130, 2481 (1963).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  24. (15).
    J. Mathews andB. Deo:Phys. Rev.,143, 1340 (1966).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  25. (16).
    H. Navelet: Rapport CEA-R 3303 (Appendix A.V).Google Scholar
  26. (17) a).
    V. Barger andD. Cline:Phys. Rev. Lett.,19, 1504 (1967);CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  27. (17) b).
    F. Hayot andA. Morel:Phys. Rev. D,8, 223 (1973).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  28. (18).
    A. K. Kerman andL. S. Kisslinger:Phys. Rev.,180, 1483 (1969).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  29. (19).
    H. Lee:Phys. Rev.,174, 2130 (1968).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  30. (20).
    T. Yao:Phys. Rev.,134, B 454 (1964).Google Scholar
  31. (21) a).
    G. W. Barry:Nucl. Phys.,85 B, 239 (1975);CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  32. (21) b).
    I. Bar-Nir, T. Risser andM. D. Shuster:Nucl. Phys.,87 B, 109 (1975).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Società Italiana di Fisica 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. C. Anjos
    • 1
  • D. Levy
    • 1
  • A. Santoro
    • 1
  1. 1.Service de Physique ThéoriqueCentre d’Etudes Nucléaires de SaclayGif-sur-YvetteFrance

Personalised recommendations