Preparation of tetragonal zirconia powders by a solid state reaction: Kinetics, phases and morphology
Powders of tetragonal (t)ZrO2 have been prepared by a solid state reaction between sodium metazirconate and sodium metaphosphate. The reaction temperatures and times have been varied between 450 and 550°C and 5 and 75 h, respectively. Zirconia powder, mostly in thet andt′ phases, is obtained. The yield of ZrO2 powder increases monotonically with time at all reaction temperatures according to a phase boundary controlled kinetics. The fraction oft phase also increases with time at 450°C and 500°C but goes through a maximum at 550°C, the highest temperature employed. A maximum of 55% of the precursor monoclinic zirconia (used to prepare sodium meta zirconate) is converted tot phase at 500°C/75 h. The ZrO2 powder consists of crystallites of size 9–25 nm agglomerated into particles having average size between 2 and 4µm. The agglomerates have a breaking strength of 100 MPa. A hydrothermal treatment is found to break the agglomerates into smaller sizes. Grinding the powder in a mortar and pestle converts only 12% of thet phase into monoclinic, indicating that substantial fraction of the tetragonal phase is the non transformable varietyt′. Heating experiments also confirm this.
KeywordsTetragonal zirconia powder preparation solid state reaction
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Brook R J 1980 inAdvances in ceramics (eds) A H Heuer and L W Hobbs (Columbus, Ohio: The American Ceramic Society) Vol. 3, p. 272Google Scholar
- Graff M A C G Van de, Keizer K and Burggraaf A J 1980 inScience of ceramics (ed.) H Hausner (Berlin: Deutche Keramiche Gesellschabt) Vol. 10, p. 983Google Scholar
- Graff M A C G Van de and Burggraaf A J 1983 inAdvances in ceramics (eds) N Claussen, M Ruhle and A H Heuer (Columbus, Ohio: The American Ceramic Society) Vol. 12, p. 744Google Scholar
- Haberko K and Pyda W 1983 inAdvances in ceramics (eds) N Claussen, M Ruhle and A H Heuer (Columbus, Ohio: The American Ceramic Society) Vol. 12, p. 774Google Scholar
- Heistand II R H, Ogure Y, Okamura H, Moffalt W C, Novich R, Barringer E A and Bowen H K 1985 inScience of ceramic processing (eds) C L Hench and R Ulrich Donald (New York: John Wiley and Sons) pp. 482–497Google Scholar
- Jean V S 1991Br. Ceram. Proc. 47 45Google Scholar
- Maher G H, Hutchins C E and Ross S D 1993Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 72 72Google Scholar
- Roosen A and Hauser H 1983 inAdvances in ceramics (eds) N Claussen, M Ruhle and A H Heuer (Columbus, Ohio: The American Ceramic Society) Vol. 12, p. 714Google Scholar
- Sirkar A and Brett N H 1970Trans. Br. Ceram. Soc. 69 131Google Scholar
- Toraya H, Yoshimara M and Somiya S 1984J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 67 C-119Google Scholar