Surgical revascularization for acute coronary syndrome
- 38 Downloads
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the adequate timing of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods: In our institution, emergency CABG has been avoided when possible for ACS patients favoring stabilization with medical therapies, including intra-aortic balloon pumping or percutaneous coronary intervention. After thorough preoperative examinations, an urgent CABG is performed. A total of 67 patients with ACS underwent CABG, comprised of 33 patients receiving an emergency CABG (emergent group: E-G) and 34 patients receiving an urgent CABG (urgent group: U-G). The early and long-term results were evaluated retrospectively. Results: Preoperatively, the incidences of acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock were significantly higher in E-G. No significant differences were found in the intraoperative factors except for the number of distal anastomoses (2.5 in E-G vs. 3.1 in U-G, p=0.01). The hospital mortality was 9.1% in E-G, and 2.9% in U-G, with no significant difference between the groups. Moreover, no patient in U-G necessitated emergency CABG while waiting for surgery. The patency rate of the grafts was 100% in E-G, and 96.2% in U-G. The 5-year survival rate excluding in-hospital death was 80.3% in E-G, and 78% in U-G (p>0.05). The 5-year cardiac event-free rate was 80.3% in E-G, and 80.9% in U-G (p>0.05). Conclusion: An emergency CABG can be reserved for ACS patients when symptoms and hemodynamic state are stabilized with medical therapies. Improvements in long-term results can be expected after high quality and complete surgical revascularization.
Key wordsacute coronary syndrome emergency coronary artery bypass grafting urgent coronary artery bypass grafting
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Braxton JH, Hammond GL, Letsou GV, Franco KL, Kopf GS, Elefteriades JA, et al. Optimal timing of coronary artery bypass graft surgery after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1995; 92 (9 Suppl): 66–8.Google Scholar
- 3.Every NR, Maynard C, Cochran RP, Martin J, Weaver WD. Characteristics, management, and outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with bypass surgery. Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Investigators. Circulation 1996; 94 (9 Suppl): 81–6.Google Scholar
- 15.Reimer KA, Jennings RB. Myocardial ischemia, hypoxia, and infarction. In: Fozzard Haeds, ed. The Heart and Cardiovascular System. New York: Raven Press, 1992; 1911–41.Google Scholar
- 24.Al-Ruzzeh S, Ambler G, Asimakopoulos G, Omar RZ, Hasan R, Fabri B, et al. Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass (OPCAB) surgery reduces risk-stratified morbidity and mortality: A United Kingdom Multi-Center Comparative Analysis of Early Clinical Outcome. Circulation 2003; 108 (Suppl I): 1–8.Google Scholar
- 27.Williams ML, Muhlbaier LH, Schroder JN, Hata JA, Peterson ED, Smith PK, et al. Risk-adjusted short- and long-term outcomes for on-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation 2005; 112 (9 Suppl): 366–70.Google Scholar