BACKGROUND: Evaluating the quality of care provided by individual primary care physicians (PCPs) may be limited by failing to know which patients the PCP feels personally responsible for.
OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a model for linking patients to specific PCPs.
DESIGN: Retrospective convenience sample.
PARTICIPANTS: Eighteen PCPs from 10 practice sites within an academic adult primary care network.
MEASUREMENTS: Each PCP reviewed the records for all outpatients seen over the preceding 3 years (16,435 patients reviewed) and designated each patient as “My Patient” or “Not My Patient.” Using this reference standard, we developed an algorithm with logistic regression modeling to predict “My Patient” using development and validation subsets drawn from the same patient set. Quality of care was then assessed by “My Patient” or “Not My Patient” designation by analyzing cancer screening test rates.
RESULTS: Overall, PCPs designated 11,226 patients (68.3%, range per provider 15% to 93%) to be “My Patient.” The model accurately categorized patients in development and validation subsets (combined sensitivity 80.4%, specificity 93.7%, and positive predictive value 96.5%). To achieve positive predictive values of >90% for individual PCPs, the model excluded 19.6% of PCP “My Patients” (range 5.5% to 75.3%). Cancer screening rates were higher among model-predicted “My Patients.”
CONCLUSIONS: Nearly one-third of patients seen were considered “Not My Patient” by the PCP, although this proportion varied widely. We developed and validated a simple model to link specific patients and PCPs. Such efforts may help effectively target interventions to improve primary care quality.
primary health care health services research quality of care patient roster provider denominator
Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st-Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.Google Scholar
Chassin MR, Galvin RW. The urgent need to improve health care quality. Institute of medicine national roundtable on health care quality. JAMA. 1998;280:1000–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2635–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuster MA, McGlynn EA, Brook RH. How good is the quality of health care in the United States? Milbank Q. 1998;76:517–63, 509.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brook RH, McGlynn EA, Cleary PD. Quality of health care. Part 2: measuring quality of care. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:966–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bass M. Approaches to the denominator problem in primary care research. J Fam Pract. 1976;3:193–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Cherkin DC, Berg AO, Phillips WR. In search of a solution to the primary care denominator problem. J Fam Pract. 1982;14:301–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Schlaud M, Brenner MH, Hoopmann M, Schwartz FW. Approaches to the denominator in practice-based epidemiology: a critical overview. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998;52(suppl 1):13S-9S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Lasko TA, Atlas SJ, Barry MJ, Chueh HC. Automated identification of a physician’s primary patients. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006;13:74–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wennberg JE, Fisher ES, Stukel TA, Skinner JS, Sharp SM, Bronner KK. Use of hospitals, physician visits, and hospice care during last six months of life among cohorts loyal to highly respected hospitals in the United States. Br Med J. 2004;328:607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson JE, Gancher WA, Bell PW. Validation of the patient roster in a primary care practice. Health Serv Res. 1985;20:301–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Blumenthal D, Epstein AM. Quality of health care. Part 6: the role of physicians in the future of quality management. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1328–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray DP, Evans P, Sweeney K, et al. Towards a theory of continuity of care. J Roy Soc Med. 2003;96:160–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkerton PH, Smith DG, Straley HL. Primary care practice coordination versus physician continuity. Fam Med. 2004;36:15–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Hofer TP, Hayward RA, Greenfield S, Wagner EH, Kaplan SH, Manning WG. The unreliability of individual physician “report cards” for assessing the costs and quality of care of a chronic disease. JAMA. 1999;281:2098–105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar