Journal of Coastal Conservation

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 171–182 | Cite as

The role of European marram grass in dune stabilization and succession near Cape Agulhas, South Africa



The coastline near the southern tip of Africa is characterized by large mobile dunes that are driven along wide beaches by strong winds throughout the year. This results in the blockage of the river mouths causing severe flooding of the low-lying farmland of the Agulhas Plain during the rainy winter season. Large parts of the driftsands were stabilized with the European dune pioneer species Marram grass (Ammophila arenaria), which has proved highly invasive along the North American west coast. In order to establish the potential invasiveness ofA. arenaria in South African coastal dune systems and its role in the succession of a large stabilization area, studies were carried out on De Mond Nature Reverve. Using aerial photos, maps and planting records, the vegetation of sites of various ages were sampled. By means of this chronosequence of stands, there is clear evidence that succession takes place at De Mond. Four communities are distinguished, varying from recent plantings ofA. arenaria to mature dune thicket or dune fynbos (heath) vegetation. These relate to four different stages of succession,A. arenaria occurring in reduced abundance in the older communities. After 50 years, formerA. arenaria areas are usually covered by dense dune scrub and in some places even in asteraceous dune fynbos. Succession is most rapid in sheltered, moist dune slacks, butA. arenaria remains vigorous in conditions favourable for its growht, i.e. on exposed, steep dune slopes with strong sand movement.A. arenaria does not appear to spread unaidedly at De Mond and has been successfully used for temporary dune stabilization.


Biological invasion Chronosequence De Mond Nature Reserve Driftsand Dune stabilization Fynbos Succession 


Arnold & de Wet (1993) 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arnold, T.H. & de Wet, B.C. (eds.) 1993.Plants of southern Africa: names and distribution. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa 62, National Botanical Institute, Pretoria.Google Scholar
  2. Avis, A. M. 1992.Coastal dure ecology and management in the Eastern Cape. Ph.D. Thesis, Rhodes University, Grahamstown.Google Scholar
  3. Avis, A. M. 1995. An evaluation of the vegetation developed after artificially stabilising South African coastal dunes with indigenous species.J. Coastal Conserv. 1: 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Avis, A. M. & Lubke, R. A. 1996. Dynamics and succession of coastal dune vegetation in the Eastern Cape, South Africa.Landscape Urban Plann. 34: 237–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bickerton, I.B. 1984. Report No. 25: Heuningnes (CSW19). In: Heydorn, A.E.F., & Grindley, J.R. (eds.)Estuaries of the Cape, part II: synopses of available information on individual systems. Research Report no. 424, CSIR, Stellenbosch.Google Scholar
  6. Brower, J.E., Zar, J.H. & von Ende, C.N. 1990.Field and laboratory methods for general ecology. 3rd ed. Wm.C. Brown Publishers, Dubuque, IA.Google Scholar
  7. Cowan, G.I. & Marneweck, G.C. 1996.South African National Report to the Ramsar Convention. South African Wetlands Conservation Programme, Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, Pretoria.Google Scholar
  8. Cowling, R.M. 1984. Asyntaxonomic and synecological study in the Humansdorp region of the Fynbos Biome.Bothalia 15:175–227.Google Scholar
  9. Cowling, R.M. (ed.) 1992.The ecology of fynbos: Nutrients, fire and diversity. Oxford University Press, Cape Town.Google Scholar
  10. Day, J.H. 1981. Summaries of current knowledge of 43 estuaries in southern Africa. In: Day, J.H. (ed.)Estuarine ecology with particular reference to southern Africa, pp. 251–330. A.A. Balkema, Cape Town.Google Scholar
  11. Dijkema, K.S. 1983. Outline of the landscape and vegetation types. In: Dijkema, K.S. & Wolff, W.J. (eds.)Flora and vegetation of the Wadden Sea islands and coastal areas, pp. 116–133. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam:Google Scholar
  12. Hertling, U.M. 1997.Ammophila arenaria (L.) Link (marram grass) in South Africa and its potential invasiveness. Ph.D. Thesis, Rhodes University, Grahamstown.Google Scholar
  13. Hertling, U.M. & Lubke, R.A. 1999a. Use ofAmmophila arenaria for dune stabilization in South Africa and its current distribution—perceptions and problems.Environ. Manage. 24: 467–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hertling, U.M. & Lubke, R.A. 1999b. Indigenous andAmmophila arenaria-dominated dune vegetation on the South African Cape coast.Appl. Veg. Sci. 2: 157–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hewett, D.G. 1970. The colonization of sand dunes after stabilization with marram grass (Ammophila arenaria).J. Ecol. 58: 653–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heywood, A.W. 1894. Sand-stay grasses: Marram grass—Ammophila arundinacea. Agricult.J. Cape Colony 15(VII): 342–343.Google Scholar
  17. Hill, M.O. 1979.TWINSP AN—A FORTRAN program for arranging multivariate data in an ordered two-way table by classification of individuals and attributes. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
  18. Hoare, D.B. 1994.Assessing successional effects on plant diversity in the Goukamma Nature Reserve Southern Cape. B.Sc. (Hons.) Thesis. Rhodes University, Grahamstown.Google Scholar
  19. Knevel, I.C. 2001.The life history of selected coastaly foredune species of south Africa. Ph.D. Thesis. Rhodes University, Grahamstown.Google Scholar
  20. Lubke, R.A. & Hertling, U.M. 1995. IsAmmophila arenaria (marram grass) a threat to South African dunefields?J. Coastal Conserv. 1: 103–108.Google Scholar
  21. Mustart, P., Cowling, R., Albertyn, J. & Paterson-Jones, C. 1997.Southern Overberg. South African wildflower guide No. 8. Botanical Society of South Africa, Kirstenbosch, Cape Town.Google Scholar
  22. ter Braak, C.J.F. 1988.CANOCO—a FORTRAN program for canonical community ordination by [partial] [detrended] [canonical] correspondence analysis, principal components analysis and redundancy analysis (version 2.1). Agricultural Mathematics Group, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  23. van der Putten, W.H., van Dijk, C. & Peters, B.A.M. 1993. Plant-specific soil-borne diseases contribute to succession in foredune vegetation.Nature 76: 313–320.Google Scholar
  24. van Dorp, D., Boot, R. & van der Maarel, E. 1985. Vegetation succession on dunes near Oostvoorne, The Netherlands, since 1934, interpreted from air photographs and vegetation maps.Vegetatio 58: 123–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Walsh, B.N. 1968.Some notes on the incidence and control of driftsands along the Caledon, Bredasdorp and Riversdale coastline of South Africa. Bull. No. 44, Department of Forestry, Pretoria.Google Scholar
  26. Wiedemann, A.M. & Pickart, A. 1996. TheAmnophila problem on the northwest coast of North America.Landscape Urban Plann. 34: 287–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Willis, A.J., Folkes, B.F., Hope-Simpson, J.F., Yemm, E.W. 1959. Braunton Burrows-the dune system and its vegetation, part II.J. Ecol. 47: 249–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© EUCC; Opulus Press Uppsala 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BotanyRhodes UniversityGrahamstownSouth Africa
  2. 2.Urban & Fischer VerlagJenaGermany

Personalised recommendations