Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 100, Issue 3, pp 515–521 | Cite as

A re-examination of the effects of instruction on the long-latency stretch reflex response of the flexor pollicis longus muscle

  • Charles Capaday
  • Robert Forget
  • Ted Milner
Original Paper


We re-examined the issue of how a subject’s intention to react to a joint perturbation may modulate the long-latency M2 stretch reflex response. The experiments were done on the flexor pollicis longus muscle (FPL) of the human thumb, for which there is evidence that its M2 reflex response is mediated, at least in part, by a pathway that traverses the motor cortex. The participation of the cerebral cortex in the genesis of the M2 reflex response may allow for a modulation of its amplitude, based on the intention of the subject. To test whether the M2 response is genuinely modulated by the subject’s intention, we examined the magnitude of this response as a function of the FPL background level of activation, measured by the surface rectified and filtered EMG. The subject was instructed either to oppose the perturbation as quickly as possible, not to react, or to relax as quickly as possible after the onset of the perturbation. The time integral of the long latency FPL EMG response, computed between 40 and 70 ms following the onset of stretch, was plotted against the mean torque produced by the distal inter-phalangeal joint of the thumb, or against the mean background FPL EMG. There were no significant differences in the FPL M2 EMG responses for different instructions. The amplitude of the reflex response was dependent only - in an approximately linear manner - on the background level of muscle activation. The total joint stiffness (intrinsic plus reflex) was also calculated for each combination of instruction and background torque. This variable was calculated over a time interval (from 75 to 105 ms) that included the torque due to the M2 reflex response superimposed on the background torque, but was well before any voluntary reaction. Again, there were no significant differences in joint stiffness as a result of the instruction. We therefore conclude that, despite a cortical contribution to the M2 stretch reflex response, this response is not influenced by the intention of the subject on how to react to a perturbation.

Key words

Long-latency EMG Stretch reflex Reflex modulation Motor cortex Human 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Akazawa K, Milner TE Stein RB (1983) Modulation of reflex EMG an stiffness in response to stretch of human finger muscle. J Neurophysiol 49:16–27PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bonnet M (1983) Anticipatory changes of long-latency stretch responses during preparation for directional hand movements. Brain Res 280:51–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Calancie B, Bawa P (1985) Firing patterns of human flexor carpi radialis motor units during the stretch reflex. J Neurophysiol 53:1179–1193PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Capaday C, Stein RB (1987) A method for simulating the reflex output of a motoneuron pool. J Neurosci Methods 21:91–104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Capaday C, Fraser R, Forget R, Lamarre Y (1989) Evidence for a transcortical stretch reflex from the study of patients with mirror movements. Soc Neurosci Abstr 15:174Google Scholar
  6. Capaday C, Forget R, Fraser R, Lamarre Y (1991) Evidence for a contribution of the motor cortex to the long-latency stretch reflex of the human thumb. J Physiol (Lond) 440:243–255Google Scholar
  7. Colebatch JG, Gandevia SC, McCloskey DI, Potter EK (1979) Subject instruction and long-latency reflex responses to muscle stretch. J Physiol (Lond) 292:527–534Google Scholar
  8. Crago PE, Houk JC, Hasan Z (1976) Regulatory action of the human stretch reflex. J Neurophysiol 39:925–935PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Day BL, Riescher H, Struppler A, Rothwell JC, Marsden CD (1991) Changes in the response to magnetic and electrical stimulation of the motor cortex following muscle stretch in man. J Physiol (Lond) 433:41–57Google Scholar
  10. Doemges F, Rack PMH (1992) Changes in the stretch reflex of the human first dorsal interosseous muscle during different tasks. J Physiol (Lond) 447:563–573Google Scholar
  11. Dufresne JR, Soechting JF, Terzuolo CA (1980) Modulation of reflex gain in man during intentional movements. Brain Res 193:67–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Evarts EV (1984) Neurophysiological approaches to brain mechanisms for preparatory set. In: Kornblum S, Requin J (eds) Preparatory states and processes. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 137–153Google Scholar
  13. Evarts EV, Granit R (1976) Relations of reflexes and intended movements. Prog Brain Res 4:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hammond PH (1956) The influence of prior instruction to the subject on an apparently involuntary neuromuscular response. J Physiol (Lond) 182:17–18Google Scholar
  15. Hore J, McCloskey DI, Taylor JL (1990) Task-dependent changes in gain of the reflex response to imperceptible perturbations of joint position in man. J Physiol (Lond) 429:309–321Google Scholar
  16. Jaeger RJ, Gottlieb GL, Agarwal GC (1982) Myoelectric responses at flexors and extensors of human wrist to step torque perturbations. J Neurophysiol 48:388–402PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lecas JC, Requin J, Anger C, Vitton N (1986) Changes in neuronal activity of the monkey precentral cortex during preparation for movement. J Neurophysiol 56:1680–1701PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lee RG, Tatton WG (1975) Motor responses to sudden limb displacements in primates with specific CNS lesions and in human patients with motor system disorders. Can J Neurol Sci 2:285–293PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee RG, Tatton WG (1982) Long-latency reflexes to imposed displacements of the human wrist: dependence on duration of movement. Exp Brain Res 45:207–216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Loo CKC, McCloskey DI (1985) Effects of prior instruction and anaesthesia on long-latency responses to stretch in the long flexor of the human thumb. J Physiol (Lond) 365:285–296Google Scholar
  21. MacKay WA, Kwan HC, Murphy JT, Wong YC (1983) Stretch reflex modulation during a cyclic elbow movement. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 55:681–698Google Scholar
  22. Marsden CD, Merton PA, Morton HB (1976) Servo action in the human thumb. J Physiol (Lond) 257:1–44Google Scholar
  23. Marsden CD, Rothwell JC, Day BL (1983) Long-latency automatic responses to muscle stretch in man: origin and function. In : Desmedt JE (ed) Motor control mechanisms in health and disease. Raven Press, New York, pp 509–539Google Scholar
  24. Matthews PBC (1989) Long-latency stretch reflexes of two intrinsic muscles of the human hand analysed by cooling the arm. J Physiol (Lond) 419:519–538Google Scholar
  25. Matthews PBC (1991) The human stretch reflex and the motor cortex. Trends Neurosci 14:87–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Matthews PBC, Farmer SF, Ingram DA (1990) On the localization of the stretch reflex of intrinsic hand muscles in a patient with mirror movements. J Physiol (Lond) 428:561–577Google Scholar
  27. Palmer E, Ashby P (1992) Evidence that a long latency stretch reflex in humans is transcortical. J Physiol (Lond) 49:429–440Google Scholar
  28. Phillips CG (1969) Motor apparatus of the baboon’s hand. Proc Roy Soc B 141–174Google Scholar
  29. Prochazka A (1989) Sensorimotor gain control: a basic strategy of motor systems? Prog Neurobiol 33:281–307PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rossignol S, Lund JP, Drew T (1988) The role of sensory inputs in regulating patterns of rythmical movements in higher vertebrates: a comparison between locomotion, respiration and mastication. In: Cohen AH, Rossignol S, Grillner S (eds) Neural control of rhythmic movements in vertebrates. Wiley, New York, pp 201–283Google Scholar
  31. Rothwell JC (1987) Set-dependent modifiability of human long-latency stretch reflexes in the muscles of the arm. In: Wise SP (ed) Higher brain functions : recent explorations of the brain’s emergent properties. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York, pp 113–132Google Scholar
  32. Rothwell JC, Traub MM, Marsden CD (1980) Influence of voluntary intent on the human long-latency stretch reflex. Nature 286:496–498PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Soechting JF, Dufresne JR, Lacquaniti F (1981) Time-varying properties of myotatic response in man during some simple motor tasks. J Neurophysiol 46:1226–1242PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Stein RB, Capaday C (1988) The modulation of human reflexes during functional motor tasks. Trends Neurosci 11:328–332PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stein RB, Yang J, Edamura M, Capaday C (1991) Reflex modulation during normal and pathological human locomotion. In: Shimamura M, Grillner S, Edgerton VR (eds) Neurobiological basis of human locomotion. Japan Scientific Societies Press, Tokyo, 335–346Google Scholar
  36. Tanji J, Evarts EV (1976) Anticipatory activity of motor cortex neurons in relation to direction of an intended movement. J Neurophysiol 39:1062–1068PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Thilmann AF, Schwartz M, Topper R, Fellows SJ, Noth J (1991) Different mechanisms underlie the long-latency stretch reflex response of active human muscle at different joints. J Physiol (Lond) 444:631–643Google Scholar
  38. Thomas JS, Brown J, Lucier GE (1977) Influence of task set on muscular responses to arm perturbations in normal subjects and Parkinson patients. Exp Neurol 55:618–628PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wolpaw JR, Carp JS (1990) Memory traces in the spinal cord. Trends Neurosci 13:137–142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yang JF, Stein RB (1990) Phase-dependent reflex reversal in human leg muscles during walking. J Neurophysiol 63:1109–1117PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles Capaday
    • 1
  • Robert Forget
    • 2
  • Ted Milner
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre De Recherche en Neurobiologie, Hôpital de L’Enfant-JésusUniversité LavalQuébecCanada
  2. 2.Institut de Réadaptation de MontréalUniversité de MontréalMontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations