Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 100, Issue 3, pp 495–502 | Cite as

Fingertip contact influences human postural control

  • John J. JekaEmail author
  • James R. Lackner
Original Paper


Touch and pressure stimulation of the body surface can strongly influence apparent body orientation, as well as the maintenance of upright posture during quiet stance. In the present study, we investigated the relationship between postural sway and contact forces at the fingertip while subjects touched a rigid metal bar. Subjects were tested in the tandem Romberg stance with eyes open or closed under three conditions of fingertip contact: no contact, touch contact (< 0.98 N of force), and force contact (as much force as desired). Touch contact was as effective as force contact or sight of the surroundings in reducing postural sway when compared to the no contact, eyes closed condition. Body sway and fingertip forces were essentially in phase with force contact, suggesting that fingertip contact forces are physically counteracting body sway. Time delays between body sway and fingertip forces were much larger with light touch contact, suggesting that the fingertip is providing information that allows anticipatory innervation of musculature to reduce body sway. The results are related to observations on precision grip as well as the somatosensory, proprioceptive, and motor mechanisms involved in the reduction of body sway.

Key words

Fingertip Posture control Spatial orientation Touch Human 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Benson AJ (1982) The vestibular sensory system. In: Barlow HB, Mollon JD (eds) The senses. Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK, pp 333–368Google Scholar
  2. Brandt T, Büchele W, Arnold F (1977) Arthrokinetic nystagmus and ego-motion sensation. Exp Brain Res 30:331–338PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burgess PR, Wei JY, Clark FJ, Simon J (1982) Signaling of kinesthetic information by peripheral sensory receptors. Ann Rev Neurosci 5:171–187PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Correia MJ, Guedry FE (1966) Modification of vestibular responses as a function of rate of rotation about an Earth-horizontal axis. Acta Otolaryngol 62:297–308PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Dichgans J, Brandt T (1973) Visual-vestibular interaction. Effects on self-motion perception and postural control. In: Held R, Leibowitz HW, Teuber HL (eds) Handbook of sensory physiology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York 755–804Google Scholar
  6. Diener HC, Dichgans J, Guschlbauer B, Mau H (1984) The significance of proprioception on postural stabilization as assessed by ischemia. Brain Res 296:103–109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gordon G (1978) Active touch. The mechanism of recognition of objects by manipulation : a multi-disciplinary approach. Pergamon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Gurfinkel VS, Levik YS (1994) The suppression of cervico-ocular response by the haptokinetic information about the contact with a rigid, immobile object. Exp Brain ResGoogle Scholar
  9. Holden M, Ventura J, Lackner JR (1987) Influence of light touch from the hand on postural sway. Soc Neurosci Abstr 13 (1):348Google Scholar
  10. Holden M, Ventura J, Lackner JR (1994) Stabilization of posture by precision contact of the index finger. J Vest Res 4:285–301Google Scholar
  11. Howard IP (1986) The perception of posture, self motion and the visual vertical. In: Boff KR, Kaufmann L, Thomas JP (eds) Sensory processes and perception. (Handbook of perception and human performance, vol 1). Wiley, New York, pp 18.1–18.62Google Scholar
  12. Hullinger M, Nordh E, Thelin A-E, Vallbo ÅB (1979) The responses of afferent fibres from the gabrous skin of the hand during voluntary finger movements in man. J Physiol (Lond) 291:233–249Google Scholar
  13. Johansson RS (1991) How is grasping modified by somatosensory input? In: Humphrey DR, Freund H-J (eds) Motor control: concepts and issues. Wiley, New York, pp 331–355Google Scholar
  14. Johnson KO, Hsiao SS (1992) Neural mechanisms of tactual form and texture perception. Ann Rev Neurosci 15:227–250PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Katz D (1950) Gestalt psychology: its nature and significance. Ronald, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Kelso JAS, Tuller B (1983) ‘Compensatory articulation’ under conditions of reduced afferent information: a dynamic formation. J Speech Hear Res 26:218–223Google Scholar
  17. Kirk RE (1982) Experimental design: procedures for the behavioral sciences. Brooks/Cole, Belmont, CalifGoogle Scholar
  18. Knibestöl M (1975) Stimulus-response functions of slowly adapting mechanoreceptors in the human glabrous skin area. J Physiol (Lond) 345:63–80Google Scholar
  19. Lackner JR (1981) Some contributions of touch, pressure and kinesthesis to human spatial orientation and oculomotor control Acta Astronautica 8(8):825–83OPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lackner JR (1992) Multimodal and motor influences on orientation: implications for adapting to weightless and virtual environments. J Vest Res 2:307–322Google Scholar
  21. Lackner JR, Graybiel A (1978a) Some influences of touch and pressure cues on human spatial orientation. Aviat Space Environ Med 49:798–804PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Lackner JR, Graybiel A (1978b) Postural illusions experienced during z-axis recumbent rotation and their dependence on somatosensory stimulation of the body surface. Aviat Space Environ Med 49:484–488PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Lackner JR, DiZio P (1984) Some efferent and somatosensory influences on body orientation and oculomotor control. In: Wooten R, Spillman L (eds) Sensory experience, adaptation and perception. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 281–301Google Scholar
  24. Marsden CD, Merton PA, Morton HB (1981) Human postural responses. Brain 104:513–534PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Matthews PBC (1981) Evolving views on the internal operation and functional role of the muscle spindle. J Physiol (Lond) 320:1–30Google Scholar
  26. Matthews PBC (1988) Proprioceptors and their contribution to somatosensory mapping: complex messages require complex processing. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 66:430–438PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Mauritz KH, Dichgans J, Hufschmidt A (1979) Quantitative analysis of stance in late cortical cerebellar atrophy of the anterior lobe and other forms of cerebellar ataxia. Brain 102:461–482PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nashner LM (1976) Adapting reflexes controlling the human posture. Exp Brain Res 26:59–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nashner LM (1981) Analysis of stance posture in humans. In: Towe A, Luschei E (eds) Motor coordination. (Handbook of behavioural neurobiology, vol 5) Plenum Press, New York, pp 27–565Google Scholar
  30. Nashner LM (1982) Adaptation of human movement to altered environments. Trends Neurosci 5:358–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Phillips CG (1985) Movements of the hand. Liverpool University, LiverpoolGoogle Scholar
  32. Senders V (1958) Measurement and statistics. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Srinivasan MA, Whitehouse JM, LaMotte RH (1990) Tactile detection of slip: surface microgeometry and peripheral neural codes. J Neurophysiol 63(6):1323–1332PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Westling G, Johansson RS (1987) Responses in glabrous skin mechanoreceptors during precision grip in humans. Exp Brain Res 66:128–140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Winter DA, Patla AE, Frank JS (1990) Assessment of balance control in humans. Med Prog Technol 16:31–51PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ashton Graybiel Spatial Orientation LaboratoryBrandeis UniversityWalthamUSA

Personalised recommendations