Structure and use of distance calls in wild bonobos (Pan paniscus)
- 130 Downloads
We report the physical structure and use of a distance call (high-hoot) by wild bonobos (Pan paniscus).Although spectrographic analyses reveal high structural variability, the total sample can be subdivided according to the composition of units—the presence or absence of an initial segment—and the range of the lowest harmonic. Analyses of samples from male—female pairs,vocalizing simultaneously and in close proximity, reveal that both animals utter calls in more or less precise temporal alternation but with different spectral ranges. Whether these differences are gender-specific or related to other factors, such as age or the social relations between particular individuals, is not clear. We suggest that (a) individuals of the same party may coordinate their vocal activity on both the temporal and the spectral level and (b) high hootings stimulate emission of equal vocalizations by members of other parties and may increase cohesion among community members. Comparison of a restricted number of spectrograms from known individuals indicates that bonobos may be able to adjust spectral parameters of one type of distance calls (high- hoot) according to corresponding calls of conspecifics.
Key wordsPan paniscus bonobo vocalization long-range communications
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bauer, H. R. (1986). A comparative study of common chimpanzee and human infant sounds. In Taub, D. M., and King, F. A. (eds.),Current Perspectives in Primate Social Dynamics, Van Nostrand Reinholds, New York, pp. 327–345.Google Scholar
- Brown, C. H. (1989). The acoustic ecology of East African primates and the perception of vocal signals by grey-cheeked mangabeys and blue monkeys. In Dooling, R. J., and Hulse, S. H. (eds.),The Comparative Psychology of Audition: Perceiving Complex Sounds, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 201–239.Google Scholar
- Fruth, B., and Hohmann, G. (in press).Comparative Analysis of Nest Building Behavior in Bonobos(Panpaniscus) and Chimpanzees. In Wrangham, R. W., McGrew, W. C., De Waal, F. and Heline, P. (eds.),Chimpanzee Cultures, Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 109–128.Google Scholar
- Goodall, J. (1986).The Chimpanzees of Combe, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge and London.Google Scholar
- Jordan, C. (1977).Das Verhalten zoolebender Zwergschimpansen, Unpublished Thesis, Universität Frankfurt a.M., Frankfurt a.M.Google Scholar
- Kano, T. (1992).The Last Ape: Pygmy Chimpanzee Behavior and Ecology, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
- Marier, P., and Hobbet, L. (1975). Individuality in a long-range vocalization of wild chimpanzees.Z. Tierpsychol. 38: 97–109.Google Scholar
- Struhsaker, T. T. (1967). Auditory communication among vervet monkeys(Cercopithecus aethiops). In Altman, S. T. (ed.),Social Communication Among Primates, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 281–324.Google Scholar
- Tröster, P. (1988).Kommunikationsverhalten beim Bonobo (Pan paniscus, Schwarz 1929) unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des akustischen Bereichs, Unpublished thesis, Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
- van Lawick-Goodall, J. (1968). A preliminary report on expressive movements and communications in the Gombe stream chimpanzees. In Jay, P. C. (ed.),Primates: Studies in Adaptation and Variability, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp. 313–374.Google Scholar