Knowledge in Society

, Volume 1, Issue 4, pp 7–27 | Cite as

When ignorance is adaptive: Not knowing about the nuclear threat

  • Joseph P. Reser
  • Michael J. Smithson

Abstract

The objective of this article is to examine the nature of individual and social responses to the nuclear threat from psychological and sociological perspectives on ignorance. It is argued that a constructed and managed ignorance concerning the nuclear threat serves many functions, structuring an individual and social reality which is reassuring, meaningful, and both individually and collectively self-serving. A sociology of ignorance framework is employed to articulate the possible benefits of “not knowing about” and collaboratively “not dealing with” the nuclear threat, as well as to define the longer-term costs of ignoring this threat. The distinctive roles played by various kinds of ignorance regarding this important issue are investigated, and the conventional wisdom that knowledge of the consequences of a nuclear war is the only way to prevent its occurrence is challenged.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anders, G. (1971). Reflections on the H-bomb. In P.T. Jerseid (Ed.),Moral issues and Christian reponse (pp. 334–342). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  2. Bok, S. (1978). Lying:Moral choice in public and private life. N.Y.: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  3. Boulding, E. (1986). Assumptions, images and skills. In R.W. White (Ed.),Psychology and the prevention of nuclear war (pp. 541–544). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, P. & Levinson, S.C. (1978). Universals in language use: Politeness phenomena. In E.N. Goody (ed.),Questions and politeness. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Cohen, S. (1978). Environmental load and allocation of attention. In A. Baum, J.E. Singer, and S. Valins (Eds.),Advances in environmental psychology (Vol. 1 pp. 1–29). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Collingridge, D. (1980).The social control of technology. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Collingridge, D. (1982).Critical decision making. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
  8. Cox, T. (1978).Stress. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  9. Derber, C. (1979).The pursuit of attention. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Douglas, M. (1966).Purity and danger. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  11. Douglas, M. & Wildavsky, A. (1982).Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technical and cultural dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  12. Festinger, L. (1957).A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Fiske, S.T., Pratto, F., & Pavelchak, M.A. (1983). Citizens' images of nuclear war: Content and consequences.Journal of Social Issues, 39, 41–65.Google Scholar
  14. Foddy, W. & Finighan, W.R. (1980). The concept of privacy from a symbolic interactionist perspective.Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 10, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frank, J. (1981). Sociopsychological aspects of the nuclear arms race. In R.R. Rogers et al. (Eds.),Psychological aspects of nuclear developments (pp. 1–10). Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  16. Glass, D.C. & Singer, J.E. (1972).Urban stress. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  17. Goffman, E. (1959).The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  18. Hilgartner, S., Bell, R.C., & O'Connor, R. (1982).Nukespeak. Ringwood, Victoria: Penguin.Google Scholar
  19. Holden, C. (1979). Paul MacLean and the Triune Brain.Science, 204, 1066–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Janis, I.L. & Mann, L. (1977). Coping with decisional conflict. In I.L. Janis (Ed.),Current trends in psychology (pp. 306–316). Los Altos, CA: William Kaufman.Google Scholar
  21. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982).Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kaplan, S. & Kaplan, R. (Eds.). (1978).Humanscape: Environments for people. North Scituate, MA: Duxbury.Google Scholar
  23. Kates, R.W. (1962)Hazard and choice perception in flood plain management. (Research Paper No. 78). University of Chicago: Department of Geography.Google Scholar
  24. Katz, D. (1960). The functional approach to the study of attitudes.Public Opinion Quarterly, 24, 163–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lazarus, R.S. & Folkman, S. (1984).Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  26. Lazarus, R.S. (1982). Thoughts on the relations between emotion and cognition.American Psychologist, 37, 1019–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lifton, R.J. (1967).Death in life: Survivors of Hiroshima. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  28. Lifton, R.J. & Falk, R. (1982).Indefensible weapons: The political and psychological case against nuclearism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  29. Macy, J.R. (1983).Despair and personal power in the nuclear age. Philadelphia: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
  30. March, J.G., & Olsen, J.P. (1979).Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  31. Merton, R.K. (1987). Three fragments from a sociologist's notebooks.Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mileti, D.S., Drabek, T.E., & Hass, J.E. (1975)Human systems in extreme environments: A sociological perspective. Boulder: Institute of Behavioural Science, University of Colorado.Google Scholar
  33. Milgram, S. (1970). The experience of living in cities.Science, 167, 1461–1468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ravetz, J.R. (1987). Usable knowledge, usable ignorance.Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 9: 87–116.Google Scholar
  35. Reser, J.P. (1980). The psychological reality of natural disasters. In J. Oliver (Ed.),Response to disaster. Townsville, Qld.: James Cook University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Reser, J.P. (1984). Thinking the unthinkable: Impact of the filmThe Day After in the imageability of a nuclear holocaust. Palmerston North: New Zealand Psychological Society Conference.Google Scholar
  37. Rogers, R.R. (1981). On emotional responses to nuclear issues and terrorism. In R.R. Rogers et al. (Eds.),Psychological aspects of nuclear developments: Report of the task force on psychological aspects of nuclear developments of the American Psychiatric Association (pp. 11–24). Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  38. Schell, J. (1982).The fate of the earth. London: Pan Books.Google Scholar
  39. Simon, H.A. (1957).Models of man: Social and rational. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  40. Simon, H. (1978). Rationality as process and as product of thought.American Economic Review, 68, 1–16.Google Scholar
  41. Sims, J.H., & Bauman, D.D. (1983).Environment and behavior, 15, 165–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Smithson, M. (1980). Interests and the growth of uncertainty.Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 10, 157–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Smithson, M. (1985). Toward a social theory of ignorance.Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 15, 151–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Smithson, M. (1987).Ignorance and uncertainty: Emerging paradigms. N.Y.: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  45. Thompson, J. (1985)Psychological aspects of nuclear war. Chichester: British Psychological Society and John Wiley.Google Scholar
  46. turner, B.A. (1978).Man-made disasters. London: Wykeham.Google Scholar
  47. Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.Science.211, 453–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Smith, M.B., Bruner, J.S., & White, R.W. (1956).Opinions and personality. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  49. Wagner, R.V. (1985). Psychology and the threat of nuclear war.American psychologist, 40, 531–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Warren, C., & Laslett, B. (1977). Privacy and secrecy: A conceptual comparison.Journal of Social Issues, 33, 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. White, R.K. (Ed.). (1986).Psychology and the prevention of nuclear war. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Wicklund, R.A. & Brehm, J.W. (1976).Perspectives on cognitive dissonance. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  53. Zajonc, R.B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences.American Psychologist, 35, 151–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Winter 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph P. Reser
    • 1
  • Michael J. Smithson
    • 1
  1. 1.James Cook University of North Queensland TownsvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations