Il Nuovo Cimento A (1965-1970)

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 801–812 | Cite as

Corrections to the goldberger-treiman relation for the3H-3He transition

  • C. Jarlskog
  • F. J. Yndurain
Article
First Online:
Received:

Summary

We have calculated the correction to the Goldberger-Treiman relation for the3H-3He transition due to the deuteron-nucleon break-up mechanism. The magnitude of the correction to the residue of the pion pole is found to be considerable.

Поправки к соотнощению Гольдбергера-Тре ймана для перехода3Н-3Не

Реэюме

Мы вычислили поправку к соотнощению Гольдбергера-Тр еймана для перехода3Н-3Не, обусловленную механиэмом дейтрон-нуклонного распада. Полуается, что величина поправки к вычету в пионном полюсе окаэывается эначительной.

Riassunto

Si è calcolata la correzione alla relazione di Goldberger-Treiman per la transizione3H-3He dovuta al meccanismo di rottura deutone-nucleone. Si trova che la grandezza della correzione al residuo del polo del pione è considerevole.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. (*).
    For a simple exposition of these concepts, see,e.g., ref. (1).Google Scholar
  2. (1).
    R. E. Marshak, Riazzuddin andC. P. Ryan:Theory of Weak Interactions in Particle Physics (New York, 1969).Google Scholar
  3. (2).
    W. Drechsler andB. Stech:Zeits. Phys.,178, 1 (1964);A. Fujii andY. Yamaguchi:Progr. Theor. Phys.,31, 107 (1964);C. W. Kim andH. Primakoff:Phys. Rev.,139, B 1447 (1965);140, B 566 (1965).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. (*).
    Our metric and conventions are as given inG. Källén:Elementary Particle Physics (Reading, Mass., 1964).Google Scholar
  5. (3).
    M. L. Goldberger andS. B. Treiman:Phys. Rev.,111, 354 (1958).MATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. (4).
    Compilation of coupling constants and low-energy parameters, Springer Tracts in Modern Physics,55, 239 (1970).Google Scholar
  7. (5).
    C. J. Christensen, V. E. Krohn andG. R. Ringo:Phys. Lett.,28 B, 411 (1969).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. (6).
    C. J. Christensen, A. Nielsen, A. Bahnsen, W. K. Brown andB. M. Rustad: Risö Report No. 226, March (1971).Google Scholar
  9. (7).
    H. Pagels:Phys. Rev.,179, 1337 (1969).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. (8).
    R. Karplus, C. M. Sommerfield andE. H. Wichmann:Phys. Rev.,111, 1187 (1958);R. E. Cutkosky:Journ. Math. Phys.,1, 429 (1960).MATHMathSciNetCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. (9).
    S. Mandelstam:Phys. Rev. Lett.,4, 84 (1960).MATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. (10).
    I. Borbei andE. I. Dolinskii:Yad. Fiz.,10, 299 (1969);Sov. Journ. Nucl. Phys.,10, 173 (1970).Google Scholar
  13. (11).
    M. P. Locher:Nucl. Phys.,23 B, 116 (1970).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. (12).
    T. E. O. Ericson andM. P. Locher:Nucl. Phys.,148 A, 1 (1970).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. (13).
    R. C. Salgo andH. H. Staub:Nucl. Phys.,138 A, 417 (1969);R. Daris andC. St-Pierre:Nucl. Phys.,138 A, 545 (1969).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. (14).
    K. E. Bergkvist: private communication, to be published inNucl. Phys. B (1972).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Società Italiana di Fisica 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Jarlskog
    • 1
  • F. J. Yndurain
    • 2
  1. 1.CERNGeneva
  2. 2.Universidad Autonoma de MadridMadrid

Personalised recommendations