International Journal of Primatology

, Volume 7, Issue 3, pp 265–287 | Cite as

Reproductive strategies of the orang-utan: New data and a reconsideration of existing sociosexual models

  • Chris L. Schürmann
  • Jan A. R. A. M. van Hooff
Article

Abstract

Recent field data indicate that MacKinnon’s model of the orang-utan’s sexual and agonistic activity needs to be revised. In this model, male reproductive activity is concentrated in an extended phase of subadulthood and in early adulthood. According to this model, the role of older adult males is primarily that of range guardian, and in that role they would ensure that the offspring they had generated earlier would have safe access to food resources. This study presents cases suggesting that subadult males, even though sexually active, may have low reproductive success. In previous studies adult males were shown to display less sexual initiative than subadult males. In this study an adult male was at times involved infrequent mating activity in response to proceptive activity of females in the course of consortship. This adult male proved to be a successful breeder, thus refuting the hypothesis of adult male sterility. The female is most likely to conceive through cooperative mating in lengthy consortships with the dominant resident adult male. We hypothesize that the extended subadult phase represents a submissive strategy, allowing subadult males to remain in the home range of adult males but with minimal reproductive success.

Key words

orang-utan reproductive strategies extended subadulthood rape strategy adult male breeding success female sexual selection 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altmann, S. A., and Altmann, J. (1980).Baboon Ecology, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  2. Aulmann, G. (1932). Geglückte Nachzucht eines Orang-Utan im Uüsseldorfer Zoo.Zool. Gart. (N.F.) 5: 81–90.Google Scholar
  3. Brandes, G. (1929). Die Backenwülste des Orang-Mannes.Zool. Gart. (N.F.) 1: 365–368.Google Scholar
  4. Brandes, G. (1931). Wie alt wird der Orang-utan?Zool. Gart. (N.F.) 4: 1–9.Google Scholar
  5. Brandes, G. (1931b). Das Wachst um der Menschenaffen im Vergleich zu dem des Menschen in Kurven dargestelt.Zool. Gart. (N.F.) 4: 339–347.Google Scholar
  6. Brandes, G. (1939).Buschi. Vom Orang-SÄugling zum Backen wülster, Quelle & Meyer, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  7. Burley, N. (1979). The evolution of concealed ovulation.Am. Nat. 114: 835–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clutton-Brock, T. H., Harvey, P. H., and Rudder, B. (1977). Sexual dimorphism, socionomic sex ratio and body weight in primates.Nature (London) 269: 797–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crook, J. H. (1972). Sexual selection, dimorphism, and social organization in the primates. In Campbell, B. G. (ed.),Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, Aldine, Chicago, pp. 231–281.Google Scholar
  10. Crook, J. H., and Gartlan, J. S. (1966). Evolution of primate societies.Nature (London) 210: 1200–1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Devore, I., and Washburn, S. L. (1963). Baboon ecology and human evolution. In Howell, F. C., and Bourlière, F. (eds.),African Ecology and Human Evolution, Aldine, Chicago, pp. 335–367.Google Scholar
  12. Eckhardt, R. B. (1975). The relative body weight of Bornean and Sumatran orangutans.Am. J. phys. Anthrop. 42: 349–350.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Emlen, S. T., and Oring, L. W. (1977). Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems.Science 197: 215–223.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Galdikas, B. M. F. (1978).Orangutan Adaptation at Tanjung Puling Reserve, Central Borneo, Ph.D. dissertation,’University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  15. Galdikas, B. M. F. (1979). Orangutan adaptation at Tanjung Puting Reserve: Mating and ecology. In Hamburg, D. A., and McCown, E. R. (eds.),The Great Apes, Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Part, Calif., pp. 194–233.Google Scholar
  16. Galdikas, B. M. F. (1981). Orangutan reproduction in the wild. In Graham, C. E. (ed.),Reproductive Biology of the Great Apes: Biomedical and Comparative Perspectives, Academic Press, New York, pp. 281–300.Google Scholar
  17. Goodall, J., Bandora, A., Bergmann, E., Busse, C., Matama, H., Mpongo, E., Pierce, A., and Riss, D. (1979). Intercommunity interactions in the chimpanzee population of the Gombe National Park. In Hamburg, D. A., and McCown, E. R. (eds.),The Great Apes, Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Part, Calif., pp. 13–53.Google Scholar
  18. Horr, D. A. (1972). The Borneo orang-utan. Population structure and dynamics in relationship to ecology and reproductive strategy. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists.Google Scholar
  19. Horr, D. A. (1975). The Borneo orang-utan: Population structure and dynamics in relationship to ecology and reproductive strategy. In Rosenblum, L. A. (ed.),Primate Behavior: Developments in Field and Laboratory Research, Vol. 4, Academic Press, New York, pp. 307–323.Google Scholar
  20. Horr, D. A. (1977). Orang-utan maturation: Growing up in a female world. In Chevalier-Skolnikoff, S., and Poirier, F. E. (eds.),Primate Bio-Social Development: Biological, Social and Ecological Determinants, Garland, New York, pp. 289–321.Google Scholar
  21. Jolly, A. (1972).The Evolution of Primate Behavior, Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Jones, M. L. (1968). Longevity of primates in captivity.Int. Zoo. Yb. 8: 183–192.Google Scholar
  23. Jones, M. L. (1976). Fact sheet on Orang Utans in captivity (Pongo pygmaeus).Am. Assoc. Zool. Parks Aquar. Newslett. 14.Google Scholar
  24. Leutenegger, W. (1978). Scaling of sexual dimorphism in body size and breeding system in primates.Nature (London) 272: 610–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leutenegger, W., and Kelly, J. T. (1977). Relationship of sexual dimorphism in canine size and body size to social, behavioral, and ecological correlates in anthropoid apes.Primates 18: 117–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. MacKinnon, J. R. (1971). The orang-utan in Sabah today.Oryx XI(2-3): 141–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. MacKinnon, J. R. (1974). The behaviour and ecology of wild orang-utans (Pongo pygmaeus).Anim. Behav. 22: 3–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. MacKinnon, J. R. (1979). Reproductive behavior in wild orangutan populations. In Hamburg, D. A., and McCown, E. R. (eds.),The Great Apes, Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, Calif. pp. 256–273.Google Scholar
  29. Mayr, E. (1972). Sexual selection and natural selection. In Campbell, B. G. (ed.),Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, Aldine, Chicago, pp. 87–104.Google Scholar
  30. Nadler, R. D. (1981). Laboratory research on sexual behavior of the great apes. In Graham, C. E. (ed.),Reproductive Biology of the Great Apes: Biomedical and Comparative Perspectives, Academic Press, New York, pp. 191–238.Google Scholar
  31. Pusey, A. (1979). Intercommunity transfer of chimpanzees in Gombe National Part. In Hamburg, D. A., and McCown, E. R. (eds.),The Great Apes, Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, Calif, pp. 464–479.Google Scholar
  32. Rijksen, H. D. (1978).A Field Study on Summatran Orang Utans (Pongo pygmaeus abeliiLesson 1827). Ecology, Behaviour and Conservation, Ph.D. dissertation, Agricultural University, Wageningen.Google Scholar
  33. Rodman, P. S. (1973). Population composition and adaptive organization among orang-utans of the Kutai Reserve. In Michael, R. P., and Crook, J. H. (eds.),Comparative Ecology and Behaviour of Primates, Academic Press, London, pp. 171–209.Google Scholar
  34. Rodman, P. S. (1979). Individual activity patterns and the solitary nature of orangutans. In Hamburg, D. A., and McCown, E. R. (eds.),The Great Apes, Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, Calif., pp. 234–255.Google Scholar
  35. Schürmann, C. L. (1981). Courtship and mating behavior of wild orangutans in Sumatra. In Chiarelli, A. B., and Corruccini, R. S. (eds.),Primate Behavior and Sociobiology, Springer, Berlin, pp. 130–135.Google Scholar
  36. Schürmann, C. L. (1982). Mating behaviour of wild orang utans. In de Boer, L. E. M. (ed.),Biology and Conservation of the Orang Utan, Junk, The Hague, pp. 271–286.Google Scholar
  37. Seitz, A. (1969a). Einige Feststellungen zur Pflege und Aufzucht von Orang-Utans,Pongo pygmaeus Hoppius 1763.Zool. Gart. (N.F.) 36: 225–245.Google Scholar
  38. Seitz, A. (1969). Notes on the body weights of new-born and young orang-utans.Int. Zoo Yb. 9: 81–84.Google Scholar
  39. Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In Campbell, B. G. (ed.),Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, Aldine, Chicago, pp. 136–179.Google Scholar
  40. Tutin, C. E. G. (1980). Reproductive behaviour of wild chimpanzees in the Gombe National Part, Tanzania.J. Reprod. Fert. Suppl. 28: 43–57.Google Scholar
  41. Ulmer, F. A. (1958). Rusty becomes a backenwulster.Am. First Zoo Philadelphia Zool. Gard. 10(2).Google Scholar
  42. van Hooff, J. A. R. A. M. (1981). Inleiding in de evolutionaire verklaring van sociaal gedrag. In de Waal, F. B. M. (ed.),Sociobiologie ter Discussie, Boon, Scheltema & Holkema, Utrecht, pp. 7–36.Google Scholar
  43. van Schaik, C. P., and van Hooff, J. A. R. A. M. (1983). On the ultimate causes of primate social systems.Behaviour 85(1–2): 91–117.Google Scholar
  44. Wilson, E. O. (1975).Sociobiology: The New Synthesis, Belknap Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chris L. Schürmann
    • 1
  • Jan A. R. A. M. van Hooff
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Comparative PhysiologyState University of UtrechtLA UtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations