International Journal of Primatology

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 215–234

Individual and social behavioral responses to injury in wild toque macaques (Macaca Sinica)

  • Wolfgang P. J. Dittus
  • Shyamala M. Ratnayeke
Article

Abstract

Toque macaques (Macaca sinica),inhabiting natural forest at Polonnaruwa, Sri Lanka, are frequently injured in fights with conspecifics. The behavior of known individuals when they were injured was compared to that after they had recovered their health. Thus, injured animals rested and alloand autogroomed more, but they foraged less and initiated fewer aggressive episodes. They spent most time being sedentary in the safety of arboreal refuges and reduced acrobatic movements by locomoting more often terrestrially. Other group members showed no special tolerance (or altruism) toward injury victims during the costly and highly competitive activity of foraging for food. In fact, some injured animals received more aggression, or lost dominance rank, and thereby had their competitive abilities further impaired. Care for the injured was manifest mostly by grooming and wound cleaning. All hair in the area surrounding a wound, as well as dirt, scabs, and fly larvae, were removed, and saliva was applied by licking the wound (wounds so treated healed with no obvious signs of infection). (1) Injured macaques sought and received significantly more grooming (owing to wound care); (2) the amount so received increased with the severity of the injury; and (3) the initiative of other group members often compensated for a victim’s inability to solicit care. Juvenile males were especially attentive to injured adult males, suggesting that they were investing in a social bond with these adults, which might reciprocate altruism toward their juvenile caregivers in the future. Injured juvenile females received most care from their mothers.

Key words

Macaca sinica injury wound care activity budget competition altruism grooming 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altmann, J. (1974). Observational study of behaviour: Sampling methods.Behaviour 49: 227–264.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Berkson, G. (1970). Defective infants in a feral monkey group.Folia primatol. 12: 284–289.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Berkson, G. (1973). Social responses to abnormal infant monkeys.Am. J. phys. Anthropol. 38: 583–586.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernstein, I. S., Williams, L., and Ramsay, M. (1983). The expression of aggression in Old World monkeys.Int. J. Primatol. 4: 113–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chapman, C. A., and Chapman, L. J. (1987). Social responses to the traumatic injury of a juvenile spider monkey (A teles geoffroyi).Primates 28: 271–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chivers, D. J. (1969). On the daily behavior and spacing of howling monkey groups.Folia primatol. 10: 48–102.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Crockett, C. M., and Pope, T. (1988). Inferring patterns of aggression from red howler monkey injuries.Am. J. Primatol. 15: 289–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dittus, W. P. J. (1977a). The social regulation of population density and age-sex distribution in the toque monkey.Behaviour 63: 281–322.Google Scholar
  9. Dittus, W. P. J. (1977b). The ecology of a semi-evergreen forest community in Sri Lanka.Biotropica 9: 268–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dittus, W. P. J. (1977c). The socioecological basis for the conservation of the toque monkey (Macaca sinica) of Sri Lanka (Ceylon). In H.S.H. Prince Rainier and Bourne, G. H. (eds.),Primate Conservation, Academic Press, New York, pp. 237–265.Google Scholar
  11. Dittus, W. P. J. (1979). The evolution of behaviours regulating density and age-specific sex ratios in a primate population.Behaviour 69: 265–302.Google Scholar
  12. Dittus, W. P. J. (1984). Toque macaque food calls: Semantic communication concerning food distribution in the environment.Anim. Behav. 32: 470–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dittus, W. P. J. (1986). Sex differences in fitness following a group take-over among toque macaques: Testing models of social evolution.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 19: 257–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dittus, W. P. J. (1987). Group fusion among wild toque macaques: An extreme case of intergroup resource competition.Behaviour 100: 247–291.Google Scholar
  15. Dittus, W. P. J., and Thorington, R. W., Jr., (1981). Techniques for aging and sexing primates. In Subcommittee on Conservation of Natural Primate Populations (ed.),Techniques for the Study of Primate Population Ecology, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 81–134.Google Scholar
  16. Drickamer, L. C. (1975). Quantitative observation of behaviour in free-rangingMacaca mulatta: Methodology and aggression.Behaviour 55: 209–236.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Dunbar, R. I. M. (1984). Reproductive decisions. In J. R. Krebs and T. Clutton-Brock (eds.),Monographs in Behavior and Ecology, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J..Google Scholar
  18. Fedigan, L. M., and Fedigan, L. (1977). The social development of a handicapped infant in a free-ranging troop of Japanese monkeys. In Chevalier-Skolnikoff, S., and Poirier, F. E. (eds.),Primate Bio-Social Development, Garland, New York, pp. 205–222.Google Scholar
  19. Furuya, Y. (1966). On the malformation occurred in the Gagyusan troop of wild Japanese monkeys.Primates 7: 488–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goodall, J. (1986).The Chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of Behavior, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  21. Hall, K. R. L., and DeVore, I. (1965). Baboon social behavior. In DeVore, I. (ed.),Primate Behavior, Field Studies of Monkeys and Apes, Holt, Reinhart and Winston, New York, pp. 53–110.Google Scholar
  22. Hausfater, G. (1972). Intergroup behavior of free-ranging rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatto).Folia primatol. 18: 78–107.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hausfater, G. (1974). Estrous females: Their effects on the social organization of the baboon group.Symp. 5th Congr. Int. Primatol. Soc, pp. 117–127.Google Scholar
  24. Hrdy, S. B. (1977).The Langurs of Abu, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  25. Jacobsen, N., and Hensten-Pettersen, A. (1974). Some biochemical characteristics of the salivary gland products ofMacaca irus andCercopithecus aethiops.Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 49B: 605–614.Google Scholar
  26. Jolly, A. (1966).Lemur Behavior, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  27. Kurland, J. A. (1977). Kin selection in the Japanese monkey.Contrib. Primatol. 12: 1–145.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lindburg, D. G. (1971). The rhesus monkey of North India: An ecological and behavioral study. In Rosenblum, L. A. (ed.),Primate Behavior: Developments in Field and Laboratory Research, Vol. 2, Academic Press, New York, pp. 2–106.Google Scholar
  29. Nakamichi, M., Fuji, H., and Koyama, T. (1983). Behavioral development of a malformed infant in a free-ranging group of Japanese monkeys.Primates 24: 52–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Neville, M. K. (1972). The population structure of red howler monkeys (Alouatta seniculus) in Trinidad and Venezuela.Folia primatol. 17: 56–86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Rohlf, F. J. (1985).Biom: A Package of Statistical Programs to Accompany the Text Biometry, State University of New York, Stony Brook.Google Scholar
  32. Ruehlmann, T. E., Bernstein, I. S., Gordon, T. P., and Balcaen, P. (1988). Wounding patterns in three species of captive macaques.Am. J. Primatol. 14: 125–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Siegel, S. (1956).Nonparametric Statistics, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  34. Simonds, P. E. (1973). Outcast males and social structure among bonnet macaques (Macaca radiata).Am. J. phys. Anthropol. 38: 599–604.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Simonds, P. E. (1965). The bonnet macaques in South India. In DeVore, I. (ed.),Primate Behavior: Field Studies of Monkeys and Apes, Holt, Reinhart and Winston, New York, pp. 175–196.Google Scholar
  36. Slatkin, M., and Hausfater, G. (1976). A note on the activities of a solitary male baboon.Primates 17: 311–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sokal, R. R., and Rohlf, F. J. (1981).Biometry, 2nd ed., W. H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco.Google Scholar
  38. Sussman, R. W., and Richard, A. F. (1974). The role of aggression among diurnal prosimians. In Holloway, R. L. (ed.),Primate Aggression, Territoriality, and Xenophobia, Academic Press, New York, pp. 49–76.Google Scholar
  39. Terborgh, J. (1983).Five New World Primates, a Study in Comparative Ecology, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J..Google Scholar
  40. Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism.Q. Rev. Biol. 46: 35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Van Schaik, C. P. (1983). Why are diurnal primates living in groups?Behaviour 87: 120–144.Google Scholar
  42. Vandenbergh, J. G., and Vessey, S. (1968). Seasonal breeding of free-ranging rhesus monkeys and related ecological factors.J. Reprod. Fertil. 15: 71–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wilkinson, L. (1988).Systat: The System for Statistics, Systat, Evanston, Ill.Google Scholar
  44. Wilson, A. P., and Boelkins, R. C. (1970). Evidence for seasonal variation in aggressive behavior byMacaco mulatto.Anim. Behav. 18: 719–724.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Whitten, P. L., and Smith, E. O. (1984). Patterns of wounding in stumptail macaques (Macaca arctoides).Primates 25: 326–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wrangham, R. W. (1980). An ecological model of female-bonded primate groups.Behaviour 75: 262–300.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wolfgang P. J. Dittus
    • 1
  • Shyamala M. Ratnayeke
    • 3
  1. 1.National Zoological ParkSmithsonian InstitutionWashington, D.C.
  2. 2.Institute of Fundamental StudiesKandySri Lanka
  3. 3.Department of ZoologyUniversity of PeradeniyaPeradeniyaSri Lanka

Personalised recommendations