International Journal of Primatology

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 199–232 | Cite as

The social organization of forest hanuman langurs(Presbytis entellus)

  • Paul N. Newton


The social organization of hanuman langurs (Presbytis entellus;Colobinae) was studied in Kanha Tiger Reserve, Central Indian Highlands, for 2300 hr (1980–1985), in a mosaic of moist deciduous forest and anthropogenic meadow. The langur population density was 46.15/km2 and the mean troop and band sizes were 21.7 and 14.0, respectively. Of 14 troops, 13 were one-male and 1 was trimale. The population adult sex ratio was 1:2.5. The majority of female sexual solicitations was directed toward the harem male. The birth season was December to May, with an estimated gestation of 171–224 days. A review of langur reproductive seasonality suggests that breeding throughout the year is confined to those populations able to exploit human food sources. Mortality during the first year of life was 40%, including infanticide. A significant positive correlation was found between the age of an infant at death or disappearance and the mother’s subsequent interbirth interval. Five cases of social change are described, including female transfer, one-male to multimale change, troop formation, and gradual and rapid replacement of troop males. Takeover-associated infant killing by band males, in an undisturbed moderate-density population, supported the sexual-selection/infanticide hypothesis but not the social-pathology hypothesis. However, it could not be directly confirmed that an invading infanticidal male gains a reproductive advantage. The male tenure of harems was estimated to be 45 months.

Key words

Presbytis entellus social organization social change reproductive behavior infanticide 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Agoramoorthy, G. (1986). Recent observations on 12 cases of infanticide in hanuman langurs,Presbytis entellus, around Jodhpur, India.Primate Rep. 14: 209–210.Google Scholar
  2. Altmann, J., Altmann, S. A., and Hausfater, G. (1978). Primate infant’s effects on mother’s future reproduction.Science 201: 1028–1029.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bishop, N. H. (1979). Himalayan langurs: Temperate colobines.J. Hum. Evol. 8: 251–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bishop, N. H., Hrdy, S. B., Teas, J., and Moore, J. (1981). Measures of human influences in habitats of South Asian monkeys.Int. J. Primatol. 2: 153–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boggess, J. (1979). Troop male membership changes and infant killing in langurs (Presbytis entellus).Folia primatol. 32: 65–107.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Boggess, J. (1980). Intermale relations and troop-male membership changes in langurs (Presbytis entellus) in Nepal.Int. J. Primatol. 1: 233–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boggess, J. (1984). Infant killing and male reproductive strategies in langurs (Presbytis entellus). In Hausfater, G., and Hrdy, S. B. (eds.),Infanticide: Comparative and Evolutionary Perspectives, Aldine, New York, pp. 283–310.Google Scholar
  8. Brander, A. A. D. (1906).Working Plan for the Forests of the Banjar Valley Reserve, Mandla Forest Division, Northern Circle, C.P., for the Period 1904-1935, Pioneer Press, Allahabad.Google Scholar
  9. Bruce, H. M. (1960). A block to pregnancy in the house mouse caused by the proximity of strange males.J. Reprod. Fert. 1: 96–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Butynski, T. M. (1982). Harem male replacement and infanticide in the blue money (Cercopithecus mil is stuhlmanni) in the Kibale Forest, Uganda.Am. J. Primatol. 3: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Calhoun, J. B. (1962). Population density and social pathology.Sci. Am. 206: 139–148.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Chalmers, N. (1979).Social Behaviour in Primates, Arnold, London.Google Scholar
  13. Chapman, M., and Hausfater, G. (1980). The reproductive consequences of infanticide in langurs: A mathematical model.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 5: 227–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chism, J. B., and Rowell, T. E. (1986). Mating and residence patterns of male patas monkeys.Ethology 72: 31–39.Google Scholar
  15. Collins, D. A., Busse, C. D., and Goodall, J. (1984). Infanticide in two populations of savanna baboons. In Hausfater, G., and Hrdy, S. B. (eds.),Infanticide: Comparative and Evolutionary Perspectives, Aldine, New York, pp. 193–215.Google Scholar
  16. Cords, M. (1984). Mating patterns and social structure in redtailed monkeys (Cercopithecus ascanius).Z. Tierpsychol. 64: 313–329.Google Scholar
  17. Crockett, C. M., and Sekulic, R. (1984). Infanticide in red howler monkeys (Alouatta seniculus). In Hausfater, G., and Hrdy, S. B. (eds.),Infanticide: Comparative and Evolutionary Perspectives, Aldine, New York, pp. 173–191.Google Scholar
  18. Curtin, R. A. (1977). Langur social behavior and infant mortality.Kroeber Anthropol. Soc. Papers 50: 27–36.Google Scholar
  19. Curtin, R. A., and Dolhinow, P. (1978). Primate social behavior in a changing world.Am. Sci. 66: 468–475.Google Scholar
  20. Dawkins, R., and Carlisle, J. R. (1976). Parental investment, mate desertion and a fallacy.Nature (London) 262: 131–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dolhinow, P. (1972). The north Indian langur. In Dolhinow, P. (ed.),Primate Patterns, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp. 181–238.Google Scholar
  22. Dunbar, R. I. M. (1984).Reproductive Decisions: An Economic Analysis of Gelada Baboon Social Strategies, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
  23. Dunbar, R. I. M., and Dunbar, E. P. (1976). Constraints on social structure among black-and-white colobus monkey groups.Anim. Behav. 24: 84–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Eisenberg, J. F., Muckenhirn, N. A., and Rudran, R. (1972). The relation between ecology and social structure in primates.Science 176: 863–874.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Elwin, V. (1939).The Baiga, John Murray, London.Google Scholar
  26. Emlen, S., and Oring, L. (1977). Ecology, sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems.Science 197: 215–225.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Forsyth, J. (1872).The Highlands of Central India, Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  28. Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical theory of social behavior.J. Theor. Biol. 7: 1–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harley, D. (1985). Birth spacing in langur monkeys (Presbytis entellus).Int. J. Primatol. 6: 227–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hausfater, G., and Hrdy, S. B. (1984).Infanticide: Comparative and Evolutionary Perspectives, Aldine, New York.Google Scholar
  31. Hausfater, G., Aref, S., and Cairns, S. J. (1982). Infanticide as an alternative male reproductive strategy in langurs: A mathematical model.J. Theor. Biol. 94: 391–412.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hrdy, S. B. (1974). Male-male competition and infanticide among langurs (Presbytis entellus) of Abu, Rajasthan.Folia primatol. 22: 19–58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Hrdy, S. B., (1977).The langurs of Abu: Female and Male Strategies of Reproduction, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  34. Hrdy, S. B. (1979). Infanticide among animals: A review, classification and examination of the implications for the reproductive strategies of females.Ethol. Sociobiol. 1: 13–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hrdy, S. B. (1982). Positivist thinking encounters field primatology, resulting in agonistic behavior.Soc. Sci. Inform. 21: 245–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kankane, P. L. (1980). Studies on the hanuman langur (Presbytis entellus (Dufresne)) at Kanha National Park, M.P.Proc. Wildlife Workshop, Dehra Dun, pp. 61–71.Google Scholar
  37. Lancaster, J. B., and Lee, R. B. (1965). The annual reproductive cycle in monkeys and apes. In Devore, I. (ed.),Primate Behavior, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp. 486–513.Google Scholar
  38. Laws, J. W., and Vonder Haar Laws, J. (1984). Social interactions among adult male langurs (Presbytis entellus) at Rajaji Wildlife Sanctary.Int. J. Primatol. 5: 31–50.Google Scholar
  39. Leland, L., Struhsaker, T. T., and Butynski, T. M. (1984). Infanticide by adult males in three primate species of the Kibale Forest, Uganda: A test of hypotheses. In Hausfater, G., and Hrdy, S. B. (eds.),Infanticide: Comparative and Evolutionary Perspectives, Aldine, New York, pp. 151–172.Google Scholar
  40. Makwana, S. C. (1979). Infanticide and social change in two groups of the hanuman langur,Presbytis entellus, at Jodhpur.Primates 20: 293–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Makwana, S. C., and Advani, R. (1981). Social changes in the hanuman langurPresbytis entellus around Jodhpur, India.J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 78: 152–154.Google Scholar
  42. Marsh, C. W. (1979). Comparative aspects of social organisation in the Tana River red colobus,Colobus badius rufomitratus.Z. Tierpsychol. 51: 337–362.Google Scholar
  43. McCann, C. (1933). Observations on some of the Indian langurs.J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 36: 616–628.Google Scholar
  44. Mehta, J. (1965).Working Plan for Mandla Division 1949-50 to 1963-64, Forest Department, Madhya Pradesh.Google Scholar
  45. Mohnot, S. M. (1971). Some aspects of social changes and infant-killing in the hanuman langur,Presbytis entellus (Primates: Cercopithecidae) in Western India.Mammalia 35: 175–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mohnot, S. M. (1978). Peripheralisation of weaned male juveniles inPresbytis entellus. In Chivers, D. J., and Herbert, J. (eds.),Recent Advances in Primatology, Academic Press, London, Vol. I, pp. 87–91.Google Scholar
  47. Mohnot, S. M. (1980). Inter-group infant kidnapping in hanuman langur,Presbytis entellus. Folia primatol. 34: 259–277.Google Scholar
  48. Mohnot, S. M., Agoramoorthy, G., and Rajpurohit, L. S. (1986). Male take-overs inducing abortions in hanuman langurs (Presbytis entellus).Primate Rep. 14: 208.Google Scholar
  49. Moore, J. (1984). Female transfer in primates.Int. J. Primatol. 5: 537–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Moore, J. (1985).Demography and Sociology in Primates, Ph.D. thesis. Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  51. Moore, J. (1986). Paternity in all-male groups of langurs (Presbytis entellus).Primate Rep. 14: 30–31.Google Scholar
  52. Moore, J., and Ali, R. (1984). Are dispersal and inbreeding avoidance related?Anim. Behav. 32: 94–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Napier, J. R., and Napier, P. H. (1967).A Handbook of Living Primates, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  54. Nagel, U., and Lohri, F. (1973). Die Languren der Kanha-Wiesen.Vierteljahrssch. naturforsch. Gesellschaft Zurich 118: 71–85.Google Scholar
  55. Newton, P. N. (1984a).The Ecology and Social Organisation of Hanuman Langurs (Presbytis entellus,Dufresne 1797) in Kanha Tiger Reserve, Central Indian Highlands, D.Phil, thesis, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  56. Newton, P. N. (1984b). Forest langurs.Sanctuary/Asia 4(4): 334–343.Google Scholar
  57. Newton, P. N. (1985). The behavioural ecology of forest hanuman langurs.Tigerpaper 12: 3–7.Google Scholar
  58. Newton, P. N. (1986). Infanticide in an undisturbed forest population of hanuman langurs,Presbytis entellus. Anim. Behav. 34: 785–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Newton, P. N. (1987). The variable social organisation of hanuman langurs (Presbytis entellus), infanticide, and the monopolization of females (submitted for publication).Google Scholar
  60. Oppenheimer, J. R. (1976).Presbytis entellus: Birth in a free-ranging primate troop.Primates 17: 541–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Oppenheimer, J. R. (1977).Presbytis entellus, the hanuman langur. In Rainier, H. S. H., and Bourne, G. H. (eds.),Primate Conservation, Academic Press, New York, pp. 469–512.Google Scholar
  62. Panwar, H. S. (no date). Management Plan for Kanha Tiger Reserve, Madhya Pradesh, 1973-4 to 1978-9, Mimeo, Madhya Pradesh Forest Department.Google Scholar
  63. Parthasarathy, M. D., and Rahman, H. (1974). Infant killing and dominance assertion among the hanuman langur.Abstr. 5th Int. Congr. Int. Primatol. Soc., Nagoya, Japan, p. 35.Google Scholar
  64. Prakash, I. (1962). Group organization, sexual behaviour and breeding season of certain Indian monkeys.Jap. J. Ecol. 12: 83–86.Google Scholar
  65. Rajpurohit, L. S., Mohnot, S. M., Agoramoorthy, G., and Srivastava, A. (1986). Observations on ousted alpha males of bisexual groups of hanuman langurs (Presbytis entellus).Primate Rep. 14: 209.Google Scholar
  66. Ripley, S. (1980). Infanticide in langurs and man: Adaptive advantage or social pathology? In Cohen, M. N., Malpass, R. S., and Klein, H. G. (eds.),Biosocial Mechanisms of Population Regulation, Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn., pp. 349–390.Google Scholar
  67. Roonwal, M. L., and Mohnot, S. M. (1977).Primates of South Asia: Ecology, Sociobiology and Behavior, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  68. Rudran, R. (1973). Adult male replacement in one-male troops of purple-faced langurs (Presbytis senex senex) and its effect on population structure.Folia primatol. 19: 166–192.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Schaller, G. B. (1967).The Deer and the Tiger, Chicago University Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  70. Schubert, G. (1982). Infanticide by usurper hanuman langur males: A sociobiological myth.Soc. Sci. Inform. 21: 199–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Siegel, S. (1956).Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, McGraw-Hill Kogakusha, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  72. Sommer, V. (1986). Adult male replacement in troops of free-ranging langurs (Presbytis entellus) around Jodhpur, India.Primate Rep. 14: 208–209.Google Scholar
  73. Sommer, V., and Mohnot, S. M. (1985). New observations of infanticides among hanuman langurs (Presbytis entellus) near Jodhpur (Rajasthan/India).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 16: 245–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Struhsaker, T. T. (1969). Correlates of ecology and social organisation among African cercopithecines.Folia primatol. 11:80–118.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Struhsaker, T. T. (1977). Infanticide and social organisation in the redtail monkey (Cercopithecus ascanius schmidti) in the Kibale Forest, Uganda.Z. Tierpsychol. 45: 75–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Struhsaker, T. T., and Leland, L. (1979). Socioecology of five sympatric monkey species in the Kibale Forest, Uganda. In Rosenblatt, J., Hinde, R. A., Shaw, E., and Beer, C. (eds.),Advances in the Study of Behaviour, Vol. 9, Academic Press, New York, pp. 159–227.Google Scholar
  77. Sugiyama, Y. (1964). Group composition, population density and some sociological observations of hanuman langurs (Presbytis entellus).Primates 5: 7–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sugiyama, Y. (1965). On the social change of hanuman langurs (Presbytis entellus) in their natural conditions.Primates 6: 381–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sugiyama, Y. (1967). Social organization of hanuman langurs. In Altmann, S. (ed.),Social Communication Among Primates, Chicago University Press, Chicago, pp. 221–236.Google Scholar
  80. Sugiyama, Y. (1976). Characteristics of the ecology of the Himalayan langurs.J. hum. Evol. 5: 249–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Sugiyama, Y., Yoshiba, K., and Parthasarathy, M. D. (1965). Home range, mating season, male group and intertroop relations of hanuman langurs (Presbytis entellus).Primates 6: 73–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investments and sexual selection. In Campbell, B. (ed.),Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, Chicago University Press, Chicago, pp. 136–179.Google Scholar
  83. Tsingalia, H. M., and Rowell, T. E. (1984). The behaviour of adult male blue monkeys.Z. Tierpsychol. 64: 253–268.Google Scholar
  84. van Schaik, C. P., and van Hooff, J. A. R. A. M. (1983). On the ultimate causes of primate social systems.Behaviour 85: 91–117.Google Scholar
  85. Vogel, C. (1977). Ecology and sociology ofPresbytis entellus. In Prasad, M. R. N., and Kumar, T. C. A. (eds.),Use of Non-human Primates in Biomedical Research, Indian National Science Academy, Delhi, pp. 24–45.Google Scholar
  86. Vogel, C. (1979). Der Hanuman-Langur (Presbytis entellus), ein Parade-Exempel für die theoretischen Konzepte der “Soriobiologie”?Verh. Dtsch. Zool. Ges. 72: 73–89.Google Scholar
  87. Vogel, C., and Loch, H. (1984). Reproductive parameters, adult male replacements and infanticide among free ranging langurs (Presbytis entellus) at Jodhpur, India. In Hausfater, G., and Hrdy, S. B. (eds.),Infanticide: Comparative and Evolutionary Perspectives, Aldine Press, New York, pp. 237–255.Google Scholar
  88. Whitten, P. L. (1982).Female Reproductive Strategies Among Vervet Monkeys, Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  89. Winkler, P., Loch, H., and Vogel, C. (1984). Life history of hanuman langurs (Presbytis entellus).Folia primatol. 43: 1–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Wittenberger, J. F. (1980). Group size and polygyny in social mammals.Am. Nat. 115:197–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Wolfheim, J. H. (1983).Primates of the World, University of Washington Press, Seattle.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul N. Newton
    • 1
  1. 1.Animal Ecology Research GroupDepartment of ZoologyOxfordEngland

Personalised recommendations