International Journal of Primatology

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 115–137 | Cite as

Problems of body-weight estimation in fossil primates

  • Glenn C. Conroy
Article

Abstract

Body-weight estimates of fossil primates are commonly used to infer many important aspects of primate paleobiology, including diet, ecology, and relative encephalization. It is important to examine carefully the methodologies and problems associated with such estimates and the degree to which one can have confidence in them. New regression equations for predicting body weight in fossil primates are given which provide body-weight estimates for most nonhominid primate species in the fossil record. The consequences of using different subgroups (evolutionary “grades”) of primate species to estimate fossil-primate body weights are explored and the implications of these results for interpreting the primate fossil record are discussed. All species (fossil and extant) were separated into the following “grades”: prosimian grade, monkey grade, ape grade, anthropoid grade, and all-primates grade. Regression equations relating lower molar size to body weight for each of these grades were then calculated. In addition, a female-anthropoid grade regression was also calculated for predicting body weight infernales of extinct, sexually dimorphic anthropoid species. These equations were then used to generate the fossil-primate body weights. In many instances, the predicted fossil-primate body weights differ substantially from previous estimates.

Key words

allometry fossil primates body weight brain size primate evolution tooth size 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blumenburg, B. (1981). Observations on the paleoecology, population sltructure and body weight of some Tertiary hominoids.J. hum. Evol. 10: 543–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blumenburg, B. (1984). Allometry and evolution of Tertiary hominoids.J. hum. Evol. 13: 613–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bown, T. (1979). New omomyid primates from middle Eocene rocks of west-central Hot Springs county, Wyoming.Folia primatol. 31: 48–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bown, T., and Rose, K. (1976). New early Tertiary primates and a reappraisal of some Plesiadapiformes.Folia primatol. 26: 109–138.Google Scholar
  5. Bown, T., and Rose, K. (1984). Reassessment of some early Eocene Omomyidae, with description of a new genus and three new species.Folia primatol. 43: 97–112.Google Scholar
  6. Cachel, S. (1983). Diet of the Oligocene anthropoidsAegyptopithecus andApidium.Primates 24: 109–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Calder, W. (1984).Size, Function, and Life History, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  8. Colbert, E. (1937). A new primate from the Upper Pondaung formation of Burma.Am. Mus. Novit. 951: 1–18.Google Scholar
  9. Fleagle, J. (1978). Size distribution of living and fossil primate faunas.Paleobiology 4: 67–76.Google Scholar
  10. Garn, S., and Lewis, A. (1958). Tooth-size, body-size and “giant” fossil man.Am. Anthropol. 60: 874–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Garn, S., Lewis, A., and Kerewsky, R. (1968). The magnitude and implications of the relationship between tooth size and body size.Arch, oral Biol. 13: 129–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gazin, C. (1968). A new primate from the Torrejon middle Paleocene of the San Juan Basin, New Mexico.Proc. biol. Soc. Wash. 81: 629–634.Google Scholar
  13. Gazin, C. (1971). Paleocene primates from the Shotgun Member of the Fort Union Formation in the Wind River Basin, Wyoming.Proc. biol. Soc. Wash. 84: 13–38.Google Scholar
  14. Gingerich, P. (1975). New North American Plesiadapidae and a biostratigraphic zonation of the Middle and Upper Paleocene.Contr. Mus. Paleontol. Univ. Mich. 24: 135–148.Google Scholar
  15. Gingerich, P. (1976). Cranial anatomy and evolution of early Tertiary Plesiadapidae.Contr. Mus. Paleontol. Univ. Mich. 15: 1–141.Google Scholar
  16. Gingerich, P. (1977). Correlation of tooth size and body size in living hominoid primates, with a note on relative brain size inAegyptopithecus andProconsul.Am. J. phys. Anthrop. 47: 395–398.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gingerich, P. (1979). Phylogeny of Middle Eocene Adapidae in North America:Smilodectes andNotharctus.J. Paleontol. 53: 153–163.Google Scholar
  18. Gingerich, P. (1980). Dental and cranial adaptations in Eocene Adapidae.Z. Morph. Anthrop. 71: 135–142.Google Scholar
  19. Gingerich, P. (1981). Early Cenozoic Omomyidae and the evolutionary history of tarsiiform primates.J. hum. Evol. 10: 345–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gingerich, P., and Dorr, J. (1979). Mandible ofChiromyoides minor from the Upper Paleocene Chappo Member of the Wasatch Formation, Wyoming.J. Paleontol. 53: 550–552.Google Scholar
  21. Gingerich, P., and Martin, R. (1981). Cranial morphology and adaptations in Eocene Adapidae. II. The Cambridge skull ofAdapts parisiensis.Am. J. phys. Anthrop. 56: 235–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gingerich, P., and Simons, E. (1977). Systematics, phylogeny, and evolution of early Eocene Adapidae in North America.Contr. Mus. Paleontol. Univ. Mich. 24: 245–279.Google Scholar
  23. Gingerich, P., and Smith, B. (1985). Allometric scaling in the dentition of primates and insectivores. In Jungers, W. (ed.),Size and Scaling in Primate Biology, Plenum, New York, pp. 257–272.Google Scholar
  24. Gingerich, P., Smith, B., and Rosenberg, K. (1982). Allometric scaling in the dentition of primates and prediction of body weight from tooth size in fossils.Am. J. phys. Anthrop. 58: 81–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gunnell, G., and Gingerich, P. (1981). A new species ofNiptomomys from the early Eocene of Wyoming.Folia primatol. 36: 128–137.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Gurche, J. (1982). Early primate brain evolution. In Armstrong, E., and Falk, D. (eds.),Primate Brain Evolution, Plenum, New York, pp. 227–246.Google Scholar
  27. Henderson, A., and Corruccini, R. (1976). Relationship between tooth size and body size in American blacks.J. dent. Res. 55: 94–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Jerison, H. (1973).The Evolution of the Brain and Intelligence, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  29. Johnson, A. (1978). Tooth size/body size inGorilla gorilla andPongo pygmaeus.J. dent. Res. 57: 608.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Jungers, W. (ed.) (1985).Size and Scaling in Primate Biology, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  31. Kay, R. (1973).Mastication, Molar Tooth Structure, and Diet in Primates, Ph.D. thesis, Yale University, New Haven, Conn.Google Scholar
  32. Kay, R. (1975). The functional adaptations of primate molar teeth.Am. J. phys. Anthrop. 43: 195–216.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kay, R. (1977). The evolution of molar occlusion in the Cercopithecidae and early catarrhines.Am. J. phys. Anthrop. 46: 327–352.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kay, R., and Cartmill, M. (1977). Cranial morphology and adaptations ofPalaechthon nacimienti and other Paromomyidae, with a description of a new genus and species.J. hum. Evol. 6: 19–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kay, R., and Simons, E. (1980). The ecology of Oligocene African Anthropoidea.Int. J. Primatol. 1: 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Karause, D. (1978). Paleocene primates from western Canada.CAn. J. Earth Sci. 15: 1250–1271.Google Scholar
  37. Orlosky, F. (1973).Comparative Dental Morphology of Extant and Extinct Cebidae, Ph.D. thesis, University of Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar
  38. Peters, R. (1983).The Ecological Implications of Body Size, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  39. Rose, K. (1975). The Carpolestidae: Early Tertiary primates from North America.Bull. Mus. comp. Zool. 147: 1–74.Google Scholar
  40. Rose, K., and Bown, T. (1982). New plesiadapiform primates from the Eocene of Wyoming and Montana.J. Vert. Paleontol. 2: 63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schmidt-Nielsen, K. (1984).Scaling. Why is Animal Size so Important? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  42. Simons, E., and Kay, R. (1983).Qatrania, new basal anthropoid primate from the Fayum, Oligocene of Egypt.Nature (London) 304: 624–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Simpson, G. (1955). The Phenacolemuridae, new family of early primates.Bull. Am. Mus. nat. Hist. 105: 417–441.Google Scholar
  44. Smith, R. (1981). Interpretation of correlations in intraspecific and interspecific allometry.Growth 45: 291–297.Google Scholar
  45. Smith, R. (1985). The present as a key to the past: Body weight of Miocene hominoids as a test of allometric methods for paleontological inference. In Jungers, W. (ed.),Size and Scaling in Primate Biology, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 437–448.Google Scholar
  46. Straus, W., and Schön, M. (1960). Cranial capacity ofOreopithecus bambolii.Science 132: 670–672.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Swindler, D. (1976).Dentition of Living Primates, Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  48. Swindler, D., and Sirianni, J. (1975). Tooth and body size correlations inMacaco nemestrina.J. dent. Res. 54: 695.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Szalay, F. (1968). The beginnings of primates.Evolution 22: 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Szalay, F. (1971). The European adapid primatesAgerina andPronycticebus.Am. Mus. Novit. 2466: 1–19.Google Scholar
  51. Szalay, F. (1973). New Paleocene primates and a diagnosis of the new suborder Paromomyiformes.Folia primatol. 19: 73–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Szalay, F., and Berzi, A. (1973). Cranial anatomy ofOreopithecus.Science 180: 183–185.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Walker, A., and Pickford, M. (1983). New postcranial fossils ofProconsul africanus andProconsul nyanzae. In Ciochon, R., and Corruccini, R. (eds.),New Interpretations of Ape and Human Ancestry, Plenum, New York, pp. 325–352.Google Scholar
  54. Walker, A., Falk, D., Smith, R., and Rickford, M. (1983). The skull ofProconsul africanus: Reconstruction and cranial capacity.Nature (London) 305: 525–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wilson, J., and Szalay, F. (1972). New paromomyid primate from Middle Paleocene beds, Kutz Canyon area, San Juan Basin, New Mexico.Am. Mus. Movit. 2499: 1–18.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Glenn C. Conroy
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology/AnthropologyWashington University School of MedicineSt. Louis

Personalised recommendations