Size and structure of freely forming conversational groups
Data from various settings suggest that there is an upper limit of about four on the number of individuals who can interact in spontaneous conversation. This limit appears to be a consequence of the mechanisms of speech production and detection. There appear to be no differences between men and women in this respect, other than those introduced by women’s lighter voices.
Key wordsConversation Group size Speech detection Spacing
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Beranek, L. L. 1954Acoustics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. E. 1971Casual Groups of Monkeys and Men. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Laaksonen, R., and A. Dornic 1990 Sex Differences in Tolerance for Noise. Reports from the Department of Psychology, University of Stockholm.Google Scholar
- Leavitt, M. J., and R. A. H. Mueller 1955 Some Effects of Feedback on Communication. InSmall Groups, A. P. Hare, E. F. Borgatta, and R. F. Bales, eds. Pp. 414–433. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
- Legget, R. F., and T. D. Northwood 1960 Noise Surveys of Cocktail Parties.Journal of the Statistical Society of America 32:16–18.Google Scholar
- Steinzor, B. 1955 The Spatial Factor in Face-to-face Discussion Groups. InSmall Groups, A. P. Hare, E. F. Borgatta, and R. F. Bales, eds. Pp. 348–352. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
- Watson, O. M. 1970Proxemic Behaviour: A Cross-Cultural Study. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar