, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 78–85 | Cite as

Distribution and habitat partitioning of immature bull sharks (Carcharhinus leucas) in a Southwest Florida estuary

  • Colin A. SimpfendorferEmail author
  • Garin G. Freitas
  • Tonya R. Wiley
  • Michelle R. Heupel


The distribution and salinity preference of immature bull sharks (Carcharhinus leucas) were examined based on the results of longline surveys in three adjacent estuarine habitats in southwest Florida: the Caloosahatchee River, San Carlos Bay, and Pine Island Sound. Mean sizes were significantly different between each of these areas indicating the occurrence of size-based habitat partitioning. Neonate and young-of-the-year animals occurred in the Caloosahatchee River and juveniles older than 1 year occurred in the adjacent embayments. Habitat partitioning may reduce intraspecific predation risk and increase survival of young animals. Classification tree analysis showed that both temperature and salinity were important factors in determining the occurrence and catch per unit effort (CPUE) of immatureC. leucas. The CPUE of <1 year oldC. leucas was highest at temperatures over 29°C and in areas with salinities between 7‰ and 17.5‰ Although they are able to osmoregulate in salinities from fresh to fully marine, youngC. leucas may have a salinity preference. Reasons for this preference are unknown, but need to be further investigated.


Importance Ranking Classification Tree Analysis Charlotte Harbor Bull Shark Salinity Preference 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Barton, M. andA. C. Barton. 1987. Effects of salinity on oxygen consumption ofCyprinodon variegates.Copeia 1987:230–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bass, A. J., J. D. D'Aubrey, andN. Kistnasamy. 1973. Sharks of the east coast of southern Africa. 1. The genusCarcharhinus (Carcharhinidae).Oceanographic Research Institute (Durban) Investigational Report 33:1–168.Google Scholar
  3. Branstetter, S. 1990. Early life history implications of selected carcharhinoid and lamnoid sharks of the northwest Atlantic. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Technical Reports, U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service 90:17–28.Google Scholar
  4. Branstetter, S. andR. Stiles. 1987. Age and growth estimates of the bull shark,Carcharhinus leucas, from the northern Gulf of Mexico.Environmental Biology of Fishes 20:169–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Breiman, L., J. H. Friedman, R. A. Olshen, andC. J. Stone. 1984. Classification and Regression Trees. Chapman and Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Caillouet, C. W., W. S. Perret, andB. J. Fontenot, Jr. 1969. Weight, length, and sex ratio of immature bull sharks,Carcharhinus leucas, from Vermillion Bay, Louisiana.Copeia 1969:196–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Compagno, L. J. V. 1984. FAO species catalogue, volume 4. Sharks of the world; an annotated and illustrated catalogue of shark species known to date, Part 2. Carcharhiniformes.FAO Fisheries Synopsis 125:251–655.Google Scholar
  8. Gunter, G. 1938. Notes on invasion of freshwater by fishes of the Gulf of Mexico, with special reference to the Mississippi-Atchafalaya river system.Copeia 1938:69–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kidder, III,G. W. 1997. Behavioral osmoregulation inFundulus heteroclitus.Bulletin of the Mount Desert Island Biological Laboratory 36:69.Google Scholar
  10. Last, P. R. andJ. D. Stevens. 1994. Sharks and Rays of Australia. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
  11. Marais, J. F. K. 1978. Routine oxygen consumption ofMugil cephalus, Liza dumerili, andL. richardsoni at different temperatures and salinities.Marine Biology 50:9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Michel, M. 2002 Environmental factors affecting the distribution and abundance of sharks in the mangrove estuary of the Ten Thousand Islands, Florida, U.S. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  13. Montova, R. V. andT. B. Thorson. 1982. The bull shark (Carcharhinus leucas) and largetooth sawfish (Pristis perotteti) in Lake Bayano, a tropical man-mad impoundment in Panama.Environmental Biology of Fishes 7:341–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Myers, G. S. 1952. Sharks and sawfishes of the Amazon.Copeia 1952:268–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Simpfendorfer, C. A. andM. R. Heupel. 2004. Assessing habitat use and movement, p. 553–572.In J. C. Carrier, J. A. Musick, and M. R. Heithaus (eds.), Biology of Sharks and Their Relatives. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
  16. Simpfendorfer, C. A. andN. E. Milward. 1993. Utilisation of a tropical nursery area by sharks of the families Carcharhinidae and Sphyrnidae.Environmental Biology of Fishes 37:337–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Snelson, Jr.F. F., T. J. Mulligan, andS. E. Williams. 1984. Food habits, occurrence, and population structure of the bull shark,Carcharhinus leucas, in Florida coastal lagoons.Bulletin of Marine Science 34:71–80.Google Scholar
  18. Snelson, Jr.,F. F. andS. E. Williams. 1981. Notes on the occurrence, distribution, and biology of elasmobranch fishes in the Indian River Lagoon system, Florida.Estuaries 4:110–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. South Florida Water Management District. 2000. Caloosahatchee Water Management Plan. South Florida Water Management District. West Palm Beach, Florida.Google Scholar
  20. Statsoft. 2004. Electronic Statistics Textbook. Statsoft, Tulsa. WEB: Scholar
  21. Taniuchi, T., M. Shimuzu, M. Sano, O. Baba, andP. R. Last. 1991a. Description of freshwater elasmobranchs collected from three rivers in northern Australia, p. 11–26.In M. Shimizu and T. Taniuchi (eds.), studies on Elasmobranchs Collected from Seven River Systems in Northern Australia and Papua New Guinea, Volume 3. The University Museum, the University of Tokyo, Nature and Culture. Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
  22. Tanuichi, T., T. T. Kan, S. Tanaka, andT. Otake. 1991b. Collection and measurement data and diagnostic characters of elasmobranchs collected from three river systems in Papua New Guinea, p. 27–41.In M. Shimizu and T. Taniuchi (eds.), Studies on Elasmobranchs Collected from Seven River Systems in Northern Australia and Papua New Guinea, Volume 3. The University Museum, the University of Tokyo, Nature and Culture, Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
  23. Thomerson, J. E., T. B. Thorson, andR. L. Hempel. 1977. The bull shark,Carcharhinus leucas, from the upper Mississippi River near Alton, Illinois.Copeia 1977:166–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Thorson, T. B. 1971. Movements of bull sharks,Carcharhinus leucas, between the Caribbean Sea and Lake Nicaragua demonstrated by tagging.Copeia 1971:336–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Thorson, T. B. 1972. The status of the bull shark,Carcharhinus leucas, in the Amazon River.Copeia 1972:601–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Thorson, T. B., C. M. Cowan, andD. E. Watson. 1973. Body fluid solutes of juveniles and adults of the euryhaline bull sharkCarcharhinus leucas from freshwater and saline environments.Physiological Zoology 46:29–42.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Estuarine Research Federation 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Colin A. Simpfendorfer
    • 1
    Email author
  • Garin G. Freitas
    • 1
  • Tonya R. Wiley
    • 1
  • Michelle R. Heupel
    • 1
  1. 1.Mote Marine LaboratorySarasota

Personalised recommendations