Journal of Coastal Conservation

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 79–88

Patterns of development and succession of vegetated hummocks in slacks of the Alexandria coastal dune field, South Africa

  • Elliott Bridget L. 
  • Kerley Graham I. H. 
  • McLachlan Anton 


Dune hummocks (small aeolian dunes formed by sand deposition in and around pioneer plants) are the smallest vegetated dune unit; they occur along the entire South African coastline but are poorly studied. Structural properties and distribution of the two main hummock-forming plants:Arctotheca populifolia (a pioneer species with fast growth rate and rapid turnover) andGazania rigens (a later colonizer with slower growth) were investigated. A marked vegetation succession exists across the floor of the slack as a result of the migration of transverse dune ridges across the slack.Arctotheca hummocks were initiated on the newly exposed eastern margin of the slack, and were replaced about midway across the width of the slack byGazania hummocks. Hummocks increased in size with distance from the eastern side of the slack.Gazania hummocks attain a greater vegetation height, support a greater vegetation complexity and mass, and attain a larger maximum size thanArctotheca hummocks. Succession, defined as both the replacement of plant species as well as site modification within the plants over time, was evident. Since the growth form and dynamics determine (1) the ability of plants to trap wind-borne soil and detritus, (2) the shape of the hummocks, and (3) the habitat complexity available to spiders and insects, the ecology of the hummocks is probably determined largely by the vegetation characteristics of the hummock-forming plants.


Animal ecology Arctothecapopulifolia Gazania rigens Landscape ecology Plant architecture 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bach, C.E. 1990. Plant successional stage and insect herbivory: flea beetles on sand-dune willow.Ecology 71: 598–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boonsma, J.J. & Van Loon, A.J. 1982. Structure and diversity of ant communities in successive coastal dune valleys.J. Anim. Ecol. 51: 957–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burkinshaw, J.R. 1990.A study of the airflow on the windward slope of a transverse dune in the Alexandria coastal dunefield. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Port Elizabeth.Google Scholar
  4. Clements, F.E. 1914.Plant succession and analysis of the development of vegetation. Carnegie Institute of Washington Publication, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  5. Doing, H. 1985. Coastal fore-dune zonation and succession in various parts of the world.Vegetatio 61: 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Duffey, E. 1968. An ecological analysis of the spider fauna of sand dunes.J. Anim. Ecol. 37: 641–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Forster, S.M. 1979. Microbial aggregation of sand in an embryo dune system.Soil Biol. Biochem. 11: 537–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Forster, S.M. & Nicolson, T.H. 1981. Aggregation of sand from a maritime embryo sand dune by microorganisms and higher plants.Soil Biol. Biochem. 13: 199–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hesp, P.A. 1981. The formation of shadow dunes.J. Sedimentol. Petrogr. 51: 101–112.Google Scholar
  10. Hesp, P.A. 1984. Surfzone, beach and foredune interactions on the Australian southeast coast.J. Coastal Res. 3: 15–25.Google Scholar
  11. Hesp, P.A. 1986. Dynamics ofGazania andArctotheca hummocks. In: Van der Merwe, D., McLachlan, A. & Hesp, P.A. (eds.)Structure and function of sand dune ecosystems. Institute for Coastal Research Report Number 8, pp. 1–103. University of Port Elizabeth.Google Scholar
  12. Hesp, P.A. 1989. A review of biological and geomorphological processes involved in the initiation and development of incipient foredunes.Proc. R. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. B— Biol. Sci. 96: 181–201.Google Scholar
  13. Heydorn, A.E.F. & Tinley, K.L. 1980. Estuaries of the Cape. Part I. Synopsis of the Cape coast.CSIR Research Report. 380: 1–97.Google Scholar
  14. Illenberger, W.K. 1988. The dunes of the Alexandria coastal dunefield, Algoa Bay, South Africa.S. Afr. J. Geol. 91: 381–390.Google Scholar
  15. Lowrie, D.C. 1948. The ecological succession of spiders of the Chicago area dunes.Ecology 29: 334–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lubke, R.A. 1983. A survey of the coastal vegetation near Port Alfred, eastern Cape.Bothalia 14: 725–738.Google Scholar
  17. Lubke, R.A. & Avis, A.M. 1982. The effect of salt spray on the growth ofScirpus nodosus.S. Afr. J. Bot. 1: 163–164.Google Scholar
  18. Lubke, R.A. & Avis, A.M. 1988. Succession on the coastal dune slacks at Kleinmonde, Eastern Cape, South Africa.Monogr. Syst. Bot. Mo. Bot. Gard. 25: 599–622.Google Scholar
  19. Masson, P. J. 1990. The interactions of the physical and biotic components on a reclaimed coastal foredune.J. Arid Environ. 19: 251–259.Google Scholar
  20. Masson, P.J. & McLachlan, A. 1990. Zonation and habitat selection on a reclaimed coastal foredune.S. Afr. J. Zool. 25: 77–83.Google Scholar
  21. McLachlan, A., Ascaray, C. & Du Toit, P. 1987. Sand movement, vegetation succession and biomass spectrum in a coastal dune slack in Algoa Bay, South Africa.J. Arid Environ. 12: 9–25.Google Scholar
  22. McLachlan, A., Kerley, G.I.H. & Rickard, C. 1996. Ecology of slacks in the Alexandria coastal dunefield.Landscape Urb. Plann. 34: 267–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McLachlan, A., Sieben, P. R. & Ascaray, C. 1982.Survey of a major coastal dunefield in the Eastern Cape. Zoology Department Report Series, No. 10. University of Port Elizabeth.Google Scholar
  24. Mueller-Dombois, D. & Ellenberg, H. 1974.Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Murdoch, W. W., Evans, F.C. & Peterson, C.H. 1972. Diversity and pattern in plants and insects.Ecology 53: 819–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pammenter, N.W. 1983. Some aspects of the ecophysiology ofScaevola thunbergii, a subtropical coastal dune pioneer. In: McLachlan, A. & Erasmus, T. (eds.)Sandy beaches as ecosystems (Developments in Hydrobiology 19), pp. 675–685. Dr. W Junk Publishers, The Hague.Google Scholar
  27. Parker-Nance, T., Talbot, M.M.B. & Bate, G.C. 1991. Vegetation and geomorphic age in the Alexandria coastal dunefield, Eastern Cape, South Africa.S. Afr. J. Sci. 87: 252–259.Google Scholar
  28. Price, P.W. 1975. Natural communities and the succession of plants and insects. In:Insect ecology, pp. 336–349. John Wiley & Sons. New York, NY.Google Scholar
  29. Ranwell, D.S. 1959. Newborough Warren, Anglesey. I. The dune system and slack habitat.J. Ecol. 47: 571–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Seliskar, D.M. 1995. Coastal dune restoration: a strategy for alleviating dieout ofAmmophila breviligulata.Restor. Ecol. 3: 54–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Southwood, T.R.E., Brown, V.K. & Reader, P.M. 1979. The relationships of plant and insect diversities in succession.Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 12: 327–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tinley, K.L. 1985. Coastal dunes of South Africa.S. Afr. Natnl. Sci. Progr. Rep. 109: 1–297.Google Scholar
  33. Van Der Merwe, D. 1989.Aspects of meiofauna ecology in coastal dune slacks. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Port Elizabeth, South Africa.Google Scholar
  34. Van Der Merwe, D. & McLachlan, A. 1991. The interstitial environment of coastal dune slacks.J. Arid Envion. 21: 151–163.Google Scholar
  35. van der Putten, W.H., van Dijk, C. & Peters, B.A.M. 1993. Plant-specific soil-borne diseases contribute to succession in foredune vegetation.Nature 362: 53–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Young, M.M. 1987.The Alexandria dunefield vegetation. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Port Elizabeth.Google Scholar
  37. Zar, J.H. 1984.Biostatistical analysis. 2nd ed. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs NJ.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© EUCC 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elliott Bridget L. 
    • 1
  • Kerley Graham I. H. 
    • 1
  • McLachlan Anton 
    • 1
  1. 1.Zoology DepartmentUniversity of Port ElizabethPort ElizabethSouth Africa
  2. 2.KwaZulu Natal Nature Conservation ServiceDurbanSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations