Journal of Coastal Conservation

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 61–66 | Cite as

Coastwatch UK—a public participation survey

  • Pond Kathy
  • Rees Gareth
Special Features in Coastal Conservation 5

Abstract

Education and public participation are recognized as important elements of coastal zone management. The current paper describes the Uk’s largest public participation survey concerned with coastal issues. Coastwatch UK involves thousands of volunteers in an annual survey of the coastline. The project has several aims—primarily to provide an insight into the major problems and threats to the coastline and, through the involvement of volunteers, to raise public awareness and aid environmental education at all levels.

Keywords

Coastal management Environmental education Pollution Volunteer 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anon. 1977.Guidelines for health-related monitoring of coastal water quality: co-ordinated Mediterranean pollution monitoring and research programme. WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen. ICP/RCE 206(4).Google Scholar
  2. Anon. 1989.Science in the National Curriculum. The Education (National Curriculum) (attainment targets and programmes of study in science) Order 1989. HMSO, London.Google Scholar
  3. Anon. 1990a.House of Commons Session 1989–1990. Environment Committee. Fourth Report. Pollution of Beaches. Vol. 1. HMSO, Lodon.Google Scholar
  4. Anon. 1990b.Summary Report. Working Group on the health impact of human exposure to recreational (marine) waters. WHO, Rimini. EUR/ICP/RUD 153(S).Google Scholar
  5. Anon. 1991.Health hazards associated with the recreational use of water. Report of a working party, December. South West Regional Health Authority, Bristol.Google Scholar
  6. Anon. 1992. Earth Summit’92. Agenda 21, Chapter 28. Local authorities’ initiatives in support of Agenda 21. In:Report of the UN Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janero, 1992. Regency Press, Cleveland Heights, OH.Google Scholar
  7. Anon. 1993.The Blue Flag 1993. FEEE, European Office, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  8. Amos, A. F., Wickham, A., Rowe, C. & Amos, L. 1994.An evaluation of volunteer beach-cleaning and data-recording methods. Paper Third International Conference on Marine debris, Miami, FL.Google Scholar
  9. Benton, T. G. 1995. From castaways to throwaways: marine litter in the Pitcairn Islands.Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 56: 415–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boalch, G. T. 1987. Recent blooms in the Western English Channel. Raports et proces verbaux des reunions.Conseil Int. Explor. Mer 187: 94–97.Google Scholar
  11. Burnham, K. P., Anderson, D. R. & Laake, J. I. 1980. Estimation of density from line transect sampling of biological populations.Wildlife Monogr. 72: 1–202.Google Scholar
  12. Burnham, K. P., Anderson, D. R. & Laake, J. I. 1985. Efficiency and bias in strip and line transect sampling.J. Wildlife Manage. 49: 1012–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Camhis, M. & Coccoccis, H. 1982. The national coastal management program of Greece.Ekistics 293: 131–137.Google Scholar
  14. Caulton, E. & Mocogni, M. 1987. Preliminary studies of manmade litter in the Firth of Forth, Scotland.Mar. Pollut. Bull. 18: 352–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Corbin, C. J. & Singh, J. G. (1993). Marine debris contamination of beaches in St Lucia and Dominica.Mar. Pollut. Bull. 26: 325–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cottingham, D. 1989. Persistent marine debris, part 1—the threat.Mar. Weather Log 33: 8–15.Google Scholar
  17. Dixon, T. R. 1992.Coastal survey of packaged chemicals and other hazardous items. ACOPS, London.Google Scholar
  18. Dixon, T. R. & Dixon, A. J. 1983:Marine litter surveillance on the North Atlantic shores of Portugal and the Western Isles of Scotland. Marine Litter research programme, Stage 5. The Tidy Britain Group, Wigan.Google Scholar
  19. Dixon, T. & Dixon, T. 1981. Marine litter surveillance.Mar. Pollut. Bull. 12: 289–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dixon, T. R. & Hawksley, C. 1980.Litter on the beaches of the British Isles. Report of the First National Shoreline Litter Survey. The Tidy Britain Group, Wigan.Google Scholar
  21. Earll, R. C. (ed.). 1995.Proceedings of a two-day workshopcoastal and riverine litter: Problems and effective solution. Marine Environmental Management and Training, Kempley.Google Scholar
  22. Faris, J. & Hart, K. 1995.Seas of debris: A summary of the Third International Conference on marine debris. North Carolina Sea Grant. UNC-SG-95-01, Miami, FL.Google Scholar
  23. Gubbay, S. 1994. The future of coastal management: challenges and opportunities. 6–7. In:Proceedings of the Coastline Conference—Public Participation in Coastal Management. Farnborough College of Technology, Farnborough.Google Scholar
  24. Harman, J., Sharland, R. & Bell, G. 1996: Local Agenda 21 in action.R. Soc.Arts J. April 1996; 41–52.Google Scholar
  25. Pearce, F. 1995. Dead in the water.New Scientist, 4th February 1995: 26–31.Google Scholar
  26. Philipp, R., Pond, K. & Rees, G. 1993. Litter and medical waste on bathing beaches in England and Wales.Brit. Med. J. 306: 1042.Google Scholar
  27. Philipp, R., Pond, K. & Rees, G. 1995. A study of litter and medical waste on the UK coastline.Health Hygiene 16: 3–8.Google Scholar
  28. Philipp, R., Pond, K. & Rees, G. 1997. Research and the problems of litter and medical wastes on the UK coastline.Brit. J. Clinic. Pract. 51: 164–168.Google Scholar
  29. Pollard, S. 1996.Beachwatch ′95. 1995 Nationwide beachclean and survey report. The Marine Conservation Society Ltd, Ross on Wye.Google Scholar
  30. Ribic, C., Dixon, T. R. & Vining, I. 1992.Marine debris survey manual. NOAA technical report. NMFS 108. US Department of Commerce, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  31. Shackleford, P. 1996. Sustainability and tourism activity. In: Peris-Mora, E. & Dubsky, K. (eds.)Proceedings Connference El Litoral: Fragil, Escaso Y Deseable. Universidad Politecnica de Valencia, ValenciaGoogle Scholar
  32. Waite, C. (ed.) 1982. Coastal management in England and Wales. In:Comparative marine policy: Perspectives from Europe, Scandinavia, Canada and the United States, pp. 65–74, Praeger, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  33. Walker, A. 1991. Waste disposal: Fresh look at a rotting problem.Brit. Med. J. 303: 1391–1394.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© EUCC 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pond Kathy
    • 1
  • Rees Gareth
    • 1
  1. 1.Robens Centre for Public and Environmental HealthUniversity of SurreyGuildfordUK

Personalised recommendations