Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 281–292 | Cite as

How European retailers view American imported products: Results of a product image survey

  • Phillip Niffenegger
  • John White
  • Guy Marmet
Article

Abstract

With the dimensions of international trade widening each year, and the oil generated U.S. balance of payments deficit unacceptably high, the need for American firms to export their products to overseas markets has never been greater. Formulation of a successful export marketing strategy for the European Community can be greatly assisted by gaining some insight into how the consumers and businessmen in the various European member nations view American products. With this in mind, a total of 163 retail store managers in Britain and France were asked to rate products “made in the U.S.A.” on each of 13 product image dimensions, and to “vote” for which of the 3 countries offered the products of greatest value in 6 different consumer product categories. The results offer some useful insights for U.S. firms seeking to tap the potential consumer markets in Britain and France.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bannister, J.P. and Saunders, J.A. 1979. “U.K. Consumers' Attitudes Towards Imports: The Measurement of National Stereotype Image”.European Journal of Marketing 12, 8, 562–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berkman, Harold and Gilson, Christopher 1978.Consumer Behavior: Concepts and Strategies. Encino, California: Dickenson Publishing Company, 85.Google Scholar
  3. Cattin, Philippe and Jolibert, Alain 1979. “An American vs. French Cross-Cultural Study Five ‘made in’ Concepts”.Proceedings of the 1979 Educators' Conference of the American Marketing Association. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 450–454.Google Scholar
  4. Churchill, Gilbert 1979. Marketing Reserch:Methodological Foundations. Hinsdale, Illinois: The Dryden Press, Second edition, 473–477.Google Scholar
  5. Etzel, Michael and Walker, Bruce 1974. “Advertising Strategy for Foreign Products”.Journal of Advertising Research 14 (June) 41–44.Google Scholar
  6. Lovelock, Christopher, Stiff, Ronald, Cullwick, David and Kaufman, Ira 1976. “An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Drop-Off Questionnaire Delivery”.Journal of Marketing Research 13 (November) 358–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Nagashima, Akira 1970. “A Comparison of Japanese and U.S. Attitudes Towards Foreign Products”.Journal of Marketing 13 (November) 358–364.Google Scholar
  8. — 1977. “A Comparison ‘Made In’ Product Image Survey Among Japanese Businessmen”.Journal of Marketing 34 (January) 68–74.Google Scholar
  9. Newby, Peter and Hardwick, John 1979. “Food Franchising: The Diffusion of an Innovation”.The Quarterly Review of Marketing 4 (Spring) 11–22.Google Scholar
  10. Sands, Saul 1979. “Can You Standardize International Marketing Strategy?”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 7 (Spring) 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sechrest, Lee, Fay, Todd L., and Zaidi, S. 1972. “Problems of Translation in Cross-Cultural Research”.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 3 (March) 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Phillip Niffenegger
    • 1
  • John White
    • 2
  • Guy Marmet
    • 3
  1. 1.Murray State UniversityMurrayUSA
  2. 2.Hong Cong PolytechnicHong Cong
  3. 3.I.U.T. de Lyon IIFrance

Personalised recommendations