Morphological, yield, cytological and molecular characterization of a bread wheat X tritordeum F1 hybrid
- 121 Downloads
The morphological, yield, cytological and molecular characteristics of bread wheat X tritordeum F1 hybrids (2n =6x = 42; AABBDHch) and their parents were analysed. Morphologically, these hybrids resembled the wheat parent. They were slightly bigger than both parents, had more spikelets per spike, and tillered more profusely. The hybrids are self-fertile but a reduction of average values of yield parameters was observed. For the cytological approach we used a double-target fluorescencein situ hybridization performed with total genomic DNA fromHordeum chilense L. and the ribosomal sequence pTa71. This technique allowed us to confirm the hybrid nature and to analyse chromosome pairing in this material. Our results showed that the expected complete homologous pairing (14 bivalents plus 14 univalents) was only observed in 9.59% of the pollen mother cells (PMCs) analysed. Some PMCs presented autosyndetic pairing of Hch and A, B or D chromosomes. The average number of univalents was higher in the wheat genome (6.8) than in the Hch genome (5.4). The maximum number of univalents per PMC was 20. We only observed wheat multivalents (one per PMC) but the frequency of trivalents (0.08) was higher than that of quadrivalents (0.058). We amplified 50 RAPD bands polymorphic between the F1 hybrid and one of its parents, and 31 ISSR polymorphic bands. Both sets of markers proved to be reliable for DNA fingerprinting. The complementary use of morphological and yield analysis, molecular cytogenetic techniques and molecular markers allowed a more accurate evaluation and characterization of the hybrids analysed here.
Keywordsbread wheat X tritordeum hybrid chromosome pairing in situ hybridization ISSR morphology RAPD
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Carvalho A., Guedes-Pinto H. and Lima-Brito J. 2003 Cytology and morphology of durum wheat X tritordeum F1 hybrids. InFrom biodiversity to genomics: breeding strategies for small grain cereals in the third millennium (ed. C. Marè, P. Faccioli and A. M. Stanca), pp. 150–152. EUCARPIA Cereal Section Meeting, Salsomaggiore, Italy (21–25 November 2002). Experimental Institute for Cereal Research, Italy.Google Scholar
- Fedak G. 1992 Intergeneric hybrids withHordeum. InBarley: genetics, biochemistry, molecular biology and biotechnology (ed. P. R. Shewry), pp. 45–68. Alden Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Fernández-Escobar J. and Martin A. 1985 Morphology, cytology and fertility of a trigeneric hybrid from triticale X tritordeum. Z.Pflanzenzuecht. 95, 311–318.Google Scholar
- Gupta P. K. and Priyadarshan P. M. 1982 Triticale: present status and future prospects.Adv. Genet. 21, 256–345.Google Scholar
- Hernández P. and Martín A. 2003 Los marcadores moleculares y la mejora genética vegetal: perspectivas y realidades. Proceedings of the Congreso de la Sociedad Española de Genética, San Lorenzo de El Escorial, Spain, pp. 23–27.Google Scholar
- Lima-Brito J., Carvalho A., Guedes-Pinto H. and Heslop-Harrison J. S. 2002 Using triticale in the production of multigeneric hybrids-cytology, morphology and fertility of the AABBRHch hybrids. InTriticale topics, international edition (ed. R. Jessop), no. 18, pp. 22–31. International Triticale Association, Australia.Google Scholar
- Martin, Cubero J. I. 1981 The use ofHordeum chilense in cereal breeding.Cereal Res. Commun.9, 317–323.Google Scholar
- Martín A. and Sánchez-Monge Laguna E. 1980 Effects of the 5B system on control of pairing inHordeum chilense XTriticum aestivum hybrids.Z. Pflanzenzuecht. 85, 122–127.Google Scholar
- Martin A., Martinez-Araque C., Rubiales D. and Ballesteros J. 1996 Tritordeum: triticale’s new brother cereal. InTriticale: today and tomorrow (ed. H. Guedes-Pinto, N. Darvey and V. P. Carnide), pp. 57–72. Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
- Stoinova J. 1994 Cytogenetic study of F1 hybrids obtained by crossing triticale (2n = 42) X tritordeum (2n = 42).Cereal Res. Commun. 22, 173–178.Google Scholar