Advertisement

Journal of Genetics

, Volume 85, Issue 2, pp 117–122 | Cite as

Genetic diversity studies of Kherigarh cattle based on microsatellite markers

  • A. K. Pandey
  • Rekha Sharma
  • Yatender Singh
  • B. B. Prakash
  • S. P. S. Ahlawat
Research Article

Abstract

We report a genetic diversity study of Kherigarh cattle, a utility draught-purpose breed of India, currently declining at a startling rate, by use of microsatellite markers recommended by the Food and Agriculture Organization. Microsatellite genotypes were derived, and allelic and genotypic frequencies, heterozygosities and gene diversity were estimated. A total of 131 alleles were distinguished by the 21 microsatellite markers used. All the microsatellites were highly polymorphic, with mean (±s.e.) allelic number of 6.24 ±1.7, ranging 4–10 per locus. The observed heterozygosity in the population ranged between 0.261 and 0.809, with mean (±s.e.) of 0.574 ±0.131, indicating considerable genetic variation in this population. Genetic bottleneck hypotheses were also explored. Our data suggest that the Kherigarh breed has not experienced a genetic bottleneck in the recent past.

Keywords

bottleneck genetic variation microsatellite Kherigarh cattle 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acharya R. M. and Bhat P. N. 1984Livestock and poultry genetic resources of India. IVRI Research Bulletin No. 1, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, India.Google Scholar
  2. Barker J. S. F. 1999 Conservation of livestock breed diversity.AGRI 25, 33–43.Google Scholar
  3. Barker J. S. F., Tan S. G., Moore S. S., Mukherjee T. K., Matheson J. L. and Selvaraj O. S. 2001 Genetic variation within and relationships among populations of Asian goats (Capra hircus).J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 118, 213–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bassam B. J., Coetano-Anolles G. and Gresshoff P. M. 1991 Fast and sensitive silver staining of DNA in polyacrylamide gels.Anal. Biochem. 196, 80–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Botstein D., White R. L., Skolnick M. and Davis R. W. 1980 Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms.Am. J. Hum. Genet. 32, 314–331.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bradley D. G., MacHugh D. G., Loftus R. T., Sow R. S., Hoste C. H. and Cunningham E. P. 1994 Zebu-taurine variation in Y chromosome DNA: a sensitive assay for introgression in West African trypnotolerant cattle populations.Anim. Genet. 25, 7–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Canon J., Alexandrino P., Bessa I., Carleos C., Carretero Y., Dunner S.et al. 2001 Genetic diversity measures of local European beef cattle breeds for conservation purposes.Genet. Sel. Evol. 33, 311–332.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cornuet J. M. and Luikart G. 1996 Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data.Genetics 144, 2001–2014.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Del Bo L., Polli M., Longeri M., Ceriotti G., Looft C., Barre-Dirie A.et al. 2001 Genetic diversity among some cattle breeds in the alpine area.J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 118, 317–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dorji T., Hannote O., Arbenz M., Rege J. E. O. and Roder W. 2003 Genetic diversity in indigenous cattle populations in Bhutan: implications for conservation.Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 16, 946–951.Google Scholar
  11. Edwards C., Dolf G., Lofft C., Loftus R. and Bradley D. 2000 Relationship between the endangered Pustertaler-Sprinzen and three related European cattle breeds as analyzed with 20 microsatellite loci.Anim. Genet. 31, 329–332.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. FAO 1995Global project for the maintenance of domestic animal genetic diversity (MoDAD)-Draft project formulation report. FAO, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
  13. Goudet J. 1995 FSTAT (version 1.2): A computer program to calculate F-statistics.J. Hered. 86, 485–486.Google Scholar
  14. Ibeagha-Awemu E. M., Jann O. C., Weimann C. and Erhardt G. 2004 Genetic diversity, introgression and relationship among West/Central African cattle breeds.Genet. Sel. Evol. 36, 673–690.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jordana J., Alexandrino P., Beija-Periera A., Bessa I., Canon J., Carretero Y.et al. 2003 Genetic structure of eighteen local south European beef cattle breeds by F-statistics.J. Anim. Genet. 120, 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim K. S., Yeo J. S. and Choi C. B. 2002 Genetic diversity of northeast Asian cattle based on microsatellite data.Anim. Genet. 33, 201–204.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kimura M. and Crow J. F. 1964 The number of alleles that can be maintained in a finite population.Genetics 49, 725–738.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kumar P., Freeman A. R., Loftus R. T., Gallard C., Fuller D. Q. and Bradley D. G. 2003 Admixture analysis of South Asian cattle.Heredity 91, 43–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Levene H. 1949 On a matching problem arising in genetics.Ann. Math. Stat. 20, 91–94.Google Scholar
  20. Loftus R. T., MacHugh D. E., Bradley D. G., Sharp P. M. and Cunningham P. 1994 Evidence for two independent domestications of cattle.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 2757–2761.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. MacHugh D. E., Shriver M. D., Loftus R. T., Cunningham P. and Bradley D. G. 1997 Microsatellite DNA variation and the evolution, domestication and phylogeography of taurine and zebu cattle (Bos taurus andBos indicus).Genetics 146, 1071–1086.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Manly B. F. J. 1985The statistics of natural selection. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  23. Maudet C., Luikart G. and Taberlet P. 2002 Genetic diversity and assignment test among seven French cattle breeds based on microsatellite DNA analysis.J. Anim. Sci. 80, 942–950.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Metta M., Kanginakudru S., Gudiseva N. and Nagaraju J. 2004 Genetic characterization of the Indian cattle breeds, Ongole and Deoni (Bos indicus), using microsatellite markers a preliminary study.BMC Genetics 5, 16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mukesh M., Sodhi M., Bhatia S. and Mishra B. P. 2004 Genetic diversity of Indian native cattle breeds as analysed with 20 microsatellites.J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 121, 416–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. NBAGR 2003 NBAGRAnnual Report 2002-03. National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources, Karnal, India.Google Scholar
  27. Nei M. 1973 Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 70, 3321–3323.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nei M. 1987Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  29. Piry S., Luikart G. and Cornuet J. M. 1999 Bottleneck: a computer program for detecting recent reductions in the effective population size using allele frequency data.J. Hered. 90, 502–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sambrook J., Fritsch E. F. and Maniatis T. 1989Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd edition. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor.Google Scholar
  31. Schmid M., Saitbekova N., Gaillard C. and Dolf G. 1999 Genetic diversity in Swiss cattle breeds.J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 116, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Weir B. S. 1996Genetic data analysis, 2nd edition. Sinauer, Sunderland.Google Scholar
  33. Yeh Francis C., Yang R.-C., Boyle Timothy B. J., Ye Z.-H. and Mao Judy X. 1999 POPGENE version 1.32, the user-friendly shareware for population genetic analysis. Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Centre, University of Alberta, Canada.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. K. Pandey
    • 1
  • Rekha Sharma
    • 1
  • Yatender Singh
    • 1
  • B. B. Prakash
    • 1
  • S. P. S. Ahlawat
    • 1
  1. 1.Core LabNational Bureau of Animal Genetic ResourcesKarnalIndia

Personalised recommendations