Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp 209–221 | Cite as

Measuring consumer innovativeness

  • Ronald E. Goldsmith
  • Charles F. Hofacker

Abstract

The development of a self-report scale to measure domain specific consumer innovativeness is described. A major problem faced by researchers interested in the diffusion of innovations has been the difficulty in measuring the innovativeness construct in a reliable and valid way. Several operationalizations have been proposed and are commonly used, yet none has received substantial evidence supporting its reliability and validity. A series of six studies describes the development and evaluation of a six-item, self-report scale to measure innovativeness within a specific domain of interest familiar to the consumer. The scale is shown to be easy to administer, highly reliable and valid, and adaptable across domains.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Babakus, Emin, Carl E. Ferguson, Jr., and Karl G. Joreskog. 1987. “The Sensitivity of Confirmatory Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis to Violations of Measurement Scale and Distributional Assumptions.”Journal of Marketing Research 24 (May): 222–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bagozzi, Richard P. 1980.Causal Models in Marketing. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  3. Bagozzi, Richard P., and Youjae Yi. 1988. “On the Evaluation of Structural Equations Models.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 16 (Spring): 74–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bentler, P.M. 1984.Theory and Implementation of EQS: A Structural Equations Program. Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software.Google Scholar
  5. Bentler, P.M., and Douglas G. Bonett. 1980. “Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures.”Psychological Bulletin 88 (November): 588–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, Frederick G. 1976.Principles of Educational and Psychological Testing. Second Edition. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  7. Browne, Michael W. 1984, “Asymptotically Distribution-Free Methods for the Analysis of Covariance Structures,”British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 37: 62–83.Google Scholar
  8. Burisch, Matthias. 1984. “Approaches to Personality Inventory, Construction,”American Psychologist 39 (March): 214–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buss, Arnold H. 1989. “Personality As Traits.”American Psychologist 44 (November): 1378–1388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Campbell, Donald T., and Donald W. Fiske. 1959. “Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix.”Psychological Bulletin 56 (March): 81–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Childers, Terry L. 1986. “Assessment of the Psychometric Properties of an Opinion Leadership Scale.”Journal of Marketing Research 23 (May): 184–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Churchill, Gilbert A., Jr. 1979. “A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs.”Journal of Marketing Research 16 (February): 64–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Engel, James F., Roger D. Blackwell, and Paul W. Miniard. 1986.Consumer Behavior. Fifth Edition. New York: The Dryden Press.Google Scholar
  14. Epstein, Seymour. 1979. “The Stability of Behavior: I. On Predicting Most of the People Much of the Time.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37 (July): 1097–1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eysenck, Hans J. 1958. “A Short Questionnaire for the Measurement of Two Dimensions of Personality.”Journal of Applied Psychology 42: 14–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Falthzik, Alfred M., and Marvin A. Jolson. 1974. “Statement Polarity in Attitude Studies.”Journal of Marketing Research 11 (February): 102–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gatignon, Hubert, and Thomas S. Robertson. 1985. “A Propositional Inventory for New Diffusion Research.”Journal of Consumer Research 11 (March): 849–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goldsmith, Ronald E., and Rene Desborde. 1990. “Further Validation of an Opinion Leadership Scale.”Journal of Business Research. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  19. Guilford, J.P. 1954.Psychometric Methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  20. Hirschman, Elizabeth C. 1980. “Black Ethnicity and Innovative Communication.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 8 (Spring): 100–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Houts, Arthur C., Thomas D. Cook, and William R. Shadish 1986. “The Person-Situation Debate: A Critical Multiplist Perspective.”Journal of Personality 54 (March): 52–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hurt, H. Thomas, Katherine Joseph, and Chester D. Cook. 1977. “Scales for the Measurement of Innovativeness.”Human Communication Research 4 (Fall): 58–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. King, Charles W., and John O. Summers. 1970. “Overlap of Opinion Leadership Across Consumer Product Categories.”Journal of Marketing Research 7 (February): 43–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kohn, Carol A., and Jacob Jacoby. 1973. “Operationally Defining the Consumer Innovator.” Pp. 837–838 inProceedings of the American Psychological Association. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  25. Kotler, Philip, and Gerald Zaltman. 1976. “Targeting Prospects for a New Product.”Journal of Advertising Research 16 (February): 7–18.Google Scholar
  26. Lastovicka, John L., and Erich A. Joachimsthaler. 1988. “Improving the Detection of Personality—Behavior Relationships in Consumer Research.”Journal of Consumer Research 14 (March): 583–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Larsen, Knud S., and Jeff LeRoux. 1983. “Item Analysis Versus Factor Analysis in the Development of Unidimensional Attitude Scales.”Journal of Social Psychology 119: 95–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Messick, Samuel. 1981. “Constructs and Their Vicissitudes in Educational and Psychological Measurement.”Psychological Bulletin 89 (May): 575–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Midgley, David F., and Grahame R. Dowling. 1978. “Innovativeness: The Concept and Its Measurement.”Journal of Consumer Research, 4 (March): 229–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nevin, John R. 1977. “Statement Polarity in Attitude Studies: Additional Evidence.” Pp. 337–340 inContemporary Marketing Thought. Eds. B.A. Greenberg and D.N. Bellinger. Chicago: American Marketing Association.Google Scholar
  31. Onkvisit, Sak and John J. Shaw. 1989. “The Diffusion of Innovations Theory: Some Research Questions and Ideas.”Akron Business and Economic Review 20 (Spring): 46–55.Google Scholar
  32. Peter, J. Paul. 1981. “Construct Validity: A Review of Basic Issues and Marketing Practices.”Journal of Marketing Research 18 (May): 133–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Price, Linda L., and Nancy M. Ridgway. 1983. “Development of a Scale to Measure Use Innovativeness.” Pp. 679–684 inAdvances in Consumer Research, Vol. 10, Eds. R.P. Bagozzi and A.M. Tybout. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  34. Ray, John J. 1985. “Acquiescence and Response Skewness in Scale Construction: a Paradox.”Personality and Individual Differences 6: 655–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rogers, Everett M. 1962.Diffusion of Innovations New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  36. Rogers, Everett M., and F. Floyd Shoemaker. 1971.Communication of Innovations. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  37. Sharma, Subhash, Srinivas Durvasula, and William R. Dillon. 1989. “Some Results on the Behavior of Alternate Covariance Structure Estimation Procedures in the Presence of Non-Normal Data.”Journal of Marketing Research 26 (May): 214–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Silver, N. Clayton, and William P. Dunlap. 1987. “Averaging Correlation Coefficients: Should Fisher’s Z Transformation Be Used?Journal of Applied Psychology 72 (February): 146–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Smith, Kent W. 1974. “Forming Composite Scales and Estimating Their Validity Through Factor Analysis.”Social Forces 53 (December): 168–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Strahan, R., and K. C. Gerbasi. 1972. “Short, Homogeneous Versions of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale.”Journal of Clinical Psychology 28 (April): 191–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tigert, Douglas J., Lawrence J. Ring, and Charles W. King. 1976. “Fashion Involvement and Buying Behavior: A Methodological Study.” Pp. 46–52. inAdvances in Consumer Research, Vol. 3. Ed. B.B. Anderson. Chicago: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  42. Venkatraman, Meera P. 1988. “Investigating Differences in the Roles of Enduring and Instrumentally Involved Consumers in the Diffusion Process.” Pp. 299–303 inAdvances in Consumer Research, Vol. 15 Ed. Michael J. Houston. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  43. Wall Street Journal. “Student Spending.” December 11, 1986.Google Scholar
  44. Wells, William D. 1961. “The Influence of Yeasaying Response Style.”Journal of Advertising Research 1 (June): 1–12.Google Scholar
  45. — 1963. “How Chronic Overclaimers Distort Survey Findings.”Journal of Advertising Research 3 (June) 8–18.Google Scholar
  46. Wells, William D., and Douglas J. Tigert 1971. “Activities, Interests, and Opinions.”Journal of Advertising Research 11 (August): 27–35.Google Scholar
  47. Wiggins, Jerry S. 1973.Personality and Prediction: Principles of Personality Assessment Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  48. Wilkie, William L. 1986.Consumer Behavior. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronald E. Goldsmith
    • 1
  • Charles F. Hofacker
    • 1
  1. 1.Florida State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations